T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
675.1 | | MSE1::PCOTE | Just say yes to 'thin clients' | Thu Mar 06 1997 11:52 | 10 |
|
> 1) dual-redundant HSZ50.
Yes, it's supported.
2) KZPBA (KZPSA replacment)
Not yet. It's being qualified I believe by StorageWorks
engineering.
|
675.2 | requirement for V3.0 on HSZ40 ?? | FIREBL::LEEDS | From VAXinated to Alphaholic | Mon Mar 10 1997 15:27 | 10 |
| Just as a follw-up question -
In order to support dual/redundant HSZ40s (not 50s), do the 40s need to be
running HSOF V3.0Z ?? I have a customer with HSZ40s at V2.7, and they want
to know if they have to upgrade to V3.0 of the HSZ firmware before they
change to dual/redundant HSZs.
Thanks
Arlan
|
675.3 | yes | SWETSC::NORDBERG | Con Brio | Mon Mar 10 1997 15:32 | 5 |
| Yes, your customer needs to upgrade to 3.0-x to meet the supported
cluster requirements..
//AndersN
|