T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
580.1 | SQL Service Pack 2 ??? | AEOENG::16.40.240.154::annecy::lehy | | Fri Jan 24 1997 13:26 | 5 |
| Reading through this notesfile, I have seen that people are using SQL 6.5
plus SP2. Is there a service pack 2 for SQL 6.5 ? I am running
NT4.0 + SP2
SQL 6.5 + SP1
CHris
|
580.2 | Available at: | MBSVAX::SLOAN | | Fri Jan 24 1997 15:08 | 9 |
| re .-1 > Is there a service pack 2 for SQL 6.5 ?
Available at the Microsoft BBS softlib/mslfiles:
12-23-96 S20395 65sp2ppc.exe SQL Server 6.5 Service Pack
212-23-96 S20394 65sp2mip.exe SQL Server 6.5 Service Pack
212-23-96 S20393 65sp2alp.exe SQL Server 6.5 Service Pack
212-23-96 S20392 65sp2x86.exe SQL Server 6.5 Service Pack 2
/Shaun
|
580.3 | RTM | LJSRV1::GOODMAN | | Mon Jan 27 1997 11:29 | 4 |
| There is a release note for the situation you describe for SQL RTM
IP: You can't use an IP address that already exists on the Lan. Reserve a
static address for the Cluster IP address
|
580.4 | SQL, not the situation described in Rel Notes | AEOENG::16.40.240.154::annecy::lehy | | Tue Jan 28 1997 03:17 | 57 |
| re -3
>IP: You can't use an IP address that already exists on the Lan. Reserve
>a static address for the Cluster IP address
I understand, that and it is not my purpose to create an operational
IP object for an address which is already in use on the LAN. I am just
stating/reporting that if you make a mistake/typo (I did it, I used an
existing IP address to create an IP object), the cluster software will be
in trouble.
>there is a release note for the situation you describe for SQL RTM
I always (never say always :-) read the release notes but I may have
misunderstood some point.
a) suspect flag
Again, I am just telling that I could not successfully enroll a database
without this database having the suspect flag first set by SQL.
b) enroll a second database
Section 4.2.4 from the Release Notes
"If unrolled Databases Become Suspect after a failover"
explains that I should first enroll the database in a failover group
Before running the stored procedures.
The pb is that I CANNOT enroll a second database, its suspect flag
being set or cleared :-) .
I will see if applying SQL SP2 fixes the problem.
From release Notes
4.2.4 If Unenrolled Databases Become Suspect After a Failover
-------------------------------------------------------------
Cluster software now lets you enroll SQL databases in
failover groups and unenroll them. If an unenrolled database
on a cluster share becomes suspect after a failover, you can
perform the following steps:
1. Enroll the database in a failover group.
2. In the SQL Enterprise Manager Query Tool, run the
following two procedures in order:
sp_fallback_dec_clean
sp_fallback_activate_svr_db
These procedures are listed in the master database.
3. Unenroll the database from the failover group.
|
580.5 | 4.2.2 in the release notes | LJSRV1::GOODMAN | | Tue Jan 28 1997 11:20 | 4 |
| There is a section in the release notes called "preparing an existing SQL
Database for a new cluster". For Beta V1.1 you must execute sp_dboption to
take the Database off-line before the cluster installation. After you
create the failover group put the databases on-line and enroll them.
|
580.6 | cluster is already installed | AEOENG::16.40.240.154::annecy::lehy | | Wed Jan 29 1997 11:52 | 3 |
| But I am trying to create a database after the cluster installation.
I will see if sp_dboption helps in this case.
|
580.7 | new Pb with Domino WEB Server | AEOENG::16.40.240.154::annecy::lehy | | Wed Jan 29 1997 11:56 | 50 |
| Gents
I just discovered the following new pb with Domino Web Server
1- Domino (partitioned) servers are running on a single machine in the
cluster (the other system is down), failover is working as expected
2- the IP names for the Domino servers are (for example)
ServerA
ServerB
these names correspond to the IP failover objects. I have checked that
the name resolution is OK on all the systems (cluster members and client
workstation)
3- I use netscape to connect to http://ServerA
ServerB responds !
I stop Domino ServerA and connect again to http://ServerA
ServerB responds !!! (argh)
4- I restart ServerA, ie ServerA and ServerB are again running on the same
system.
5- I use the Notes client to connect to a database on ServerA
=> it works as expected
=> I stop Domino Server A and try to connect to ServerA again
=> It fails (as expected)
To fix this, I tried to use the DOMCFG.NSF database to create virtual WEB
servers and specify an IP address. This does not fix the Pb (same
behaviour)
Any idea ? Did you test this point.
the Notes.ini files contain the following entry
TCPIP_TcpIpAddress=0,<floating IP addresss>:1352
Christophe
|
580.8 | Try setting the IP port number | LJSRV1::ILSLEY | Blow up the abattoir! | Wed Jan 29 1997 14:37 | 13 |
| Re: .7
Did you try setting a different IP port
for one of the web servers, using the
HTTP settings (Public Address book, Server document)?
The default port for web servers is 80.
You'd have to set the port for a second web server
to a different port number (81, 82, etc.).
The user would need to specify the port number.
For example: http:\\ServerA:81
|
580.9 | re -1. it works but its not nice | AEOENG::16.40.240.154::annecy::lehy | | Thu Jan 30 1997 06:57 | 14 |
| re -1
>Did you try setting a different IP port
Yes, it works. But this is not very nice. If you are a provider and run
the Notes networks for five companies on your cluster, then the
customers will have to enter http://www.mycompany.xxx.com:<portnumber>
It seems that the http machine in Domino is listening at all IP addresses
enabled on the system.
But this is probably not a Cluster issue, and I'll see if there is a Domino
conference somewhere.
Thanks.
|
580.10 | I think this is a general restriction... | LJSRV1::ILSLEY | Blow up the abattoir! | Thu Jan 30 1997 15:40 | 5 |
| re: .9
I believe this is a general restriction (or feature :))
for web servers, not a Domino issue.
|