T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
64.1 | Moral Minority | AIMT::PETERS | Be nice or be dog food | Sat Aug 07 1993 01:08 | 26 |
| I think you are missing the point. lots of people like violence on TV.
cop shows, detective shows, A Team wantabies, science fiction new
world exploration, period piece dramas, and so on. All of the top 10
show of all time have a liberal portion of violence. The least violent
show is MASH a show set in the middle of a war.
It is not politically correct but people love to watch violence.
There are several vocal minorities that for "people's good" want to limit
violence on TV but no one says it is not interesting. Like anything
violence can be taken to an extreme and repulse people but most people
find a show without any violence or sex extremely slow or dry. With the
exception of sex I can't think of any theme that so permeates
entertainment not only now but since the start of recorded of history.
Most of the classic works in history are a chock full of violence.
American Culture has set certain standard on what people should and
shouldn't find entertaining and it has no basis in the real world.
People want a good story with interesting characters involved in sex or
violence or both. They always have and they always will. Words like
moderation and restraint always seem to be used to tell how others
should live their life. I make intelligent choices on what I can
do and enjoy my life short term and long term. What I do may look to
some as restraint and other as excess. People should watch what they
enjoy and let people form there own opinion. If you want to limit the
amount of violence your children watch that's your duty as a parent to
do what you think is best for your child but don't try to change the world
to suit your opinion of right and wrong.
Jeff Peters
|
64.2 | A bit of everything and a finger on the OFF button | IJSAPL::KLERK | Quality by Design | Sat Aug 07 1993 02:46 | 15 |
|
I suppose it's about time that shows are going to show as much loving
care and affection, including the physical motions of it, as we're seeing
violence and corpses flying around (which don't bother me, I'll switch to
another non-Schwarzenegger channel).
Oddly enough people opposing against violence become even more violent
if s*x is shown on TV.
The only thing we seem to be able to watch safely are Billy Graham, the
Little House on the Prairey and Postman Pat. I know I'll be safely asleep
by then.
Theo
|
64.3 | Warning: The following show is mindless | FSOA::HAMILTON | | Tue Aug 10 1993 04:26 | 19 |
| One problem I see with a good number of today's hit shows is they have
absolutely no story. How many years ago was it when you had to watch a
movie and pay attention because there was a plot? Today you can sit in
a theater with folks all around you talking out loud to each other and
you hardly miss a thing. Sad. Even shows based on a crime,
like The Fugitive, had very little if any violence, but lots of
suspense. Gunsmoke might have had one shoot-out a week, but there was
a story with a moral to it.
I enjoy Hunter even though he shoots at least one person an episode.
In real life, few police draw their weapons and even fewer fire them.
When they do, there is a dept. investigation. Remember when <name?> on
Hill St. Blues shot the youngster that was left home alone? He was
eventually exonerated but ended in a mental hospital. Really
well-written, well-acted shows cost $$$ to produce. Shows with video
cameras, and 1/2 hour skits are cheap. Shows that take up most of the
hour with lots of sex and violence don't need to work at character
development.
|
64.4 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Aug 10 1993 06:45 | 53 |
| <<< Note 64.39 by FSOA::HAMILTON >>>
> One problem I see with a good number of today's hit shows is they have
> absolutely no story. How many years ago was it when you had to watch a
> movie and pay attention because there was a plot?
The answer is zero. Star Trek the New Generation has a good story just about
every week. Masterpiece Theater and Mystery on PBS almost always have good
stories. Law and Order is consistently quality stuff.
When comparing shows of the present to shows of the past, the most common
mistake made is that people remember the best shows of the old days and forget
all the mindless stuff that went along with it. Yes, there were shows like
the Fugitive, Have Gun with Travel, etc. but there were others as well.
I don't remember Gun Smoke quite the way you do, it seems that there was one
basic plot that was on every other week,
- Mat Dillon meets a best friend from the past. They are glad to see each
other again.
- Mat Dillon tells Miss Kitty about his old friend.
- Doc and Chester/Festis talk about life.
- Mat Dillon finds out his friend has committed a murder.
- Mat Dillon struggles with his desire to look the other way and his duty
to bring him to justice.
- Chester/Festis tells Miss Kitty about Mat's dilemma. Miss Kitty has a
worried look but women in the west must be strong.
- Duty wins, Mat XXX his old friend where XXX is:
- Shoots him in a gun fight
- Gets there just as he dies
- Brings him in to be tried and hung.
- Mat goes to the Long Branch for a drink. Kitty/Chester/Doc/Festis try
to make him feel better. He does because justice was done.
And that was one of the better westerns. Shows like Cheyenne basically
consisted of
- Cheyenne played by Chet Walker takes off his shirt to plow a field.
- Cheyenne played by Chet Walker takes off his shirt to mend a fence.
- Cheyenne played by Chet Walker takes off his shirt because it is hot.
- Cheyenne played by Chet Walker takes off his shirt to take a bath.
- Cheyenne played by Chet Walker takes off his shirt out of habit.
Chet Walker, you see, was the 50's Arnnie S.
As for the sitcoms, they were even more mindlessness. Donna Reed was totally
devoid of any content. Father knows best didn't. Wally and the Beav should have
been given noogies. That stuff was deplorable.
Yes there is a lot of junk on today as there always has been but that
certainly doesn't justify censorship.
George
|
64.5 | The past is always better - that's why I listen to oldies! | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Take me for a little while | Wed Aug 11 1993 02:12 | 9 |
| George, excellent descriptions of Gunsmoke and Cheyenne! Although
your plot description for Gunsmoke may have had too much detail!!!
My favorite westerns were Have Gun Will Travel (mostly because of the
cool song and the business card), Maverick, and Sugarfoot. Maverick
was funny and often made you think. Sugarfoot was funny and tried not
to make you think. Both were successful at what they did.
NAZZ
|