T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1065.1 | The Clinton gummint has no tolerance for scofflaws | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Fri Mar 10 1995 07:28 | 4 |
| In the United States, that would be a good way to get Janet Reno and
her Waffen BATF to burn the church down.
/john
|
1065.2 | an effective non-violent protest (so far) | DECALP::GUTZWILLER | happiness- U want what U have | Fri Mar 10 1995 09:45 | 11 |
|
technically at least the churches which harbour the refugees are not
breaking the law. they grant "church asylum" and the refugee lives on
the church premises.
over here, law enforcement agencies would be justified by law to enter
church premises in order to arrest the refugee. so far, police have been
reluctant to do so however.
andreas.
|
1065.3 | | POWDML::FLANAGAN | I feel therefore I am | Fri Mar 10 1995 09:52 | 5 |
| The Unitarian Universalist Churches have in the past harbored refugees
and most likely would do so in the future if the individual congregation
deemed the action appropriate.
Patricia
|
1065.4 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Unquenchable fire | Fri Mar 10 1995 13:49 | 5 |
| If I may wax poetic, all in my church are refugees.
Shalom,
Richard
|
1065.5 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Unquenchable fire | Fri Mar 10 1995 14:22 | 12 |
| To answer your question in the context it was asked, Andreas, the particular
church where I presently hold membership has yet to be confronted by such a
situation.
Should the situation arise, I would hope the church would remember the
Christian witness of those who were involved in the American Underground
Railroad and those who sheltered the European Jews and others earlier this
century.
Shalom,
Richard
|
1065.6 | who are today's refugees? | DECALP::GUTZWILLER | happiness- U want what U have | Fri Mar 17 1995 09:41 | 25 |
|
> Should the situation arise, I would hope the church would remember the
> Christian witness of those who were involved in the American Underground
> Railroad and those who sheltered the European Jews and others earlier this
> century.
you touch on an interesting area here. through the lenses of history it is
easy to identify historical refugees. today we know that it was right to help
the slave who escaped from a southern plantation, to make it to the north.
we also know today that it was right to help fleeing jews in the midst of the
antisemitic mass-hysteria. looking back we also know that when the help was
needed most, at the time, little was given.
how do we identify today's refugees? no doubt tomorrows history books will
tell us who they were.
the stated motivation of the churches mentioned in .0, is to counter a growing
anit-immigrant sentiment. if they harbour refugees regardless of whether these
have been subject to persecution (due to political or religious beliefs) they
may be building a controversial case: is someone who is 'merely' escaping from
death by famine not also entitled to our assistance?
andreas.
|
1065.7 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Unquenchable fire | Sat Mar 18 1995 12:05 | 19 |
| .6
Excellent consideration, Andreas.
It is not always easy to see in one's own time who might need the sheltering
arms of refuge.
I think we need to be ever mindful of the last, the least, and the lost. If
we sever this connection, we fail Christ.
There is a great deal of anti-immigrant sentiment in the U.S. right now, too.
Many would have us say, "There is no room in the inn. There is no room at
the table." There is distrust, resentment, and fear.
I think it's sinful.
Peace,
Richard
|