[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference lgp30::christian-perspective

Title:Discussions from a Christian Perspective
Notice:Prostitutes and tax collectors welcome!
Moderator:CSC32::J_CHRISTIE
Created:Mon Sep 17 1990
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1362
Total number of notes:61362

1046.0. "two kinds of human?" by DECALP::GUTZWILLER (happiness- U want what U have) Tue Jan 24 1995 05:22

are there two different kinds of humans?

1039.15>     born again belivers -  body, soul, and spirit
1039.15>     unbleivers -  body and soul

tom's remark, whilst probably unintended, appears to suggest that there are
different elements which make up a human - body and soul (where soul equates 
to life for humans and animals alike), and, only in the case of believing 
christians, a spirit. 

reading 1039.15 i am left with the impression that there are two kinds of 
humans. one type made up of body and soul, no more, no less than animals and 
the other type made up of body, soul and spirit.

aren't all humans alike? either all made up of just body and soul or do all 
humans consist of the same elements, body, soul and spirit, as tom's closing 
remark suggests

1039.15> God created man afetr his own image {spirit}.
1039.15>
1039.15>	Thus man had three parts:  
1039.15>
1039.15>	1. A body - formed from the ground
1039.15>	2. A soul - breath life
1039.15>	3. A spirit  - the image of God
1039.15>
1039.15> God created within man spirit, His image. This is the part of man 
1039.15> which makes it possible for God to talk to man and man to communicate 
1039.15> to God.

what the question comes down to - in the eyes of believing christians, are all 
humans made in the image of god or are there two kinds of humans?



andreas.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1046.1MKOTS3::JMARTINI lied; I hate the fat dinosaurTue Jan 24 1995 10:0712
    For a regenerated believer, there is a forth element.
    
    body
    soul 
    spirit
    Holy Spirit 
    
    Once we receive, we have invited Christ into our lives.  The Holy
    Spirit then dwells within us.  "Know ye not that your body is the
    temple of the Holy Spirit?"  One of Pauls letters.
    
    -Jack
1046.2The image of God in all humanityCSC32::J_CHRISTIEUnquenchable fireTue Jan 24 1995 11:497
    .0
    
    I believe there's only one kind of human being.
    
    Shalom,
    Richard
    
1046.3RDGENG::YERKESSbring me sunshine in your smileTue Jan 24 1995 12:197
re .2

 That's what the Bible teaches for we are all offspring originating
 from Adam & Eve.


 Phil.
1046.4MKOTS3::JMARTINI lied; I hate the fat dinosaurTue Jan 24 1995 12:545
    We are all offspring of Adam and born into the same condition.  
    
    That's why we need to be reborn according to Jesus words to Nicodemus!
    
    -Jack
1046.5is that it?DECALP::GUTZWILLERhappiness- U want what U haveTue Jan 24 1995 12:5911
.1>    For a regenerated believer, there is a forth element.
.1>    
.1>    body
.1>    soul 
.1>    spirit
.1>    Holy Spirit 

and if the believer loses faith he reverts back to three?


andreas.
1046.6MKOTS3::JMARTINI lied; I hate the fat dinosaurTue Jan 24 1995 14:546
    Good question and I have struggled with this at times.
    
    I believe once saved always saved.  The prodigal son is a good example
    of this.  Once regenerated, you become in essence the property of God.
    
    -Jack
1046.7CSC32::J_OPPELTWhatever happened to ADDATA?Tue Jan 24 1995 19:4910
    	Had the prodigal son never returned, I think the story would have
    	ended differently.
    
    	I believe one can fall away from salvation.  He is always welcome
    	to return.
    
    	Remember the father in the prodigal son story said "My son was
    	dead and has come back."
    
    	When we become prodigal sons we are spiritually dead.
1046.8re .6,.7 prodigal sons & propertyDECALP::GUTZWILLERhappiness- U want what U haveWed Jan 25 1995 03:188
.6> Once regenerated, you become in essence the property of God.

why would a son ever become property of his father? 
this doesn't make sense.


andreas.
1046.9MKOTS3::JMARTINI lied; I hate the fat dinosaurWed Jan 25 1995 09:0316
    Not property as in chattel...but as a child.
    
    
    Paul demonstrates this in 1st Corinthians where he talks about the
    submissiveness of a husband to his wife and a wife to her husband.
    The verse in Ephesians I cited regarding the sealing of the Holy Spirit
    holds great significance.  Back in those times, a seal had great 
    meaning as it signified the mark of ownership by the Roman government.
    This is why Jesus tomb had the Roman seal put upon it...and that's why
    the Roman guards at the tomb would have faced a horrible execution had
    they fallen asleep on guard duty at the grave site.  This is how
    important a seal was.  As we are sealed with the Holy Spirit, we are
    given a mark of righteousness.  This is in essence what I meant by
    ownership.
    
    -Jack
1046.10MKOTS3::JMARTINI lied; I hate the fat dinosaurWed Jan 25 1995 09:1021
    >>I believe one can fall away from salvation.  He is always
    >>welcome to return.
    
    So Joe, you believe the Holy Spirit can leave us?  That we are not
    sealed unto the day of redemption?  This would imply that the finished
    work of the cross was not sufficient enough to reddem a person...even
    from a season of a lack of faith.  
    
   >> Remember the father in the prodigal son story said "My son was
   >> dead and has come back."
    
    True, then again, faith without works is dead...yet we are only
    justified by the saving grace of Christ dying on the cross by faith.
    Keep in mind that although the son was dead in his fathers eyes, he was
    never disowned by the father.  Another parelle in scripture is the
    Church of Sardis in Revelation 3.  God mentions they think they are
    alive but they are dead.  God never disowns them...rather, he exhorts
    them to cling to what they have been taught in the past...and repent!
    
    -Jack
    When we become prodigal sons we are spiritually dead.
1046.11no ownership whatsoever!DECALP::GUTZWILLERhappiness- U want what U haveWed Jan 25 1995 10:048
.9>  Not property as in chattel...but as a child.

sorry jack, a child is in no way at no time a property. it is 
a responsibility but not a property. there must be a fundamental
misconception here.


andreas.
1046.12CSC32::J_OPPELTWhatever happened to ADDATA?Wed Jan 25 1995 12:175
>    So Joe, you believe the Holy Spirit can leave us?  
    
    	No.  I don't believe that God ever leaves us.
    
    	I believe that people leave God.
1046.13MKOTS3::JMARTINI lied; I hate the fat dinosaurWed Jan 25 1995 13:3012
    Joe:
    
    This is an important discussion.  Consider the following.  According to
    Romans 7, our sin nature is overcome by the Spirit, but it never goes
    away.  In the eyes of God, we are in a perpetual state of sin.  We are
    only reconciled by the atonement of the cross.  Therefore, although we
    are separated through constant sin, the Holy Spirit, which never leaves
    us, is our righteousness before God.  
    
    I think the real question is...was one saved in the first place?
    
    -Jack
1046.14three different answersPOWDML::FLANAGANI feel therefore I amWed Jan 25 1995 15:1622
    From what I understand, Christians as a group cannot make up their mind
    on the answer.  There are three contradictory answers all with Biblical
    Support.
    
    1.  God has preselected a small number of individuals and offered them
    new life in Christ.  Because they have been preselected they can accept
    the light that is Jesus Christ.
    
    2. God has not preselected any.  He offers everyone his free gift of
    grace.  Those who accept have a new life in Christ, Those who reject
    are children of Darkness.
    
    3.  God has selected all.  all are  of the same spirit and are children
    of God.
    
    I believe all humans are created in the image of Goddess/God and are thus
    equally children of Goddess/God.  I choose alternative three.
    
    
    
    
                                Patricia
1046.15MIMS::CASON_KWed Jan 25 1995 15:4115
    Patricia,
    
    If I may make a slight modification to your response, there are at
    least four different views.  Calvinist, Wesleyan, Mediating and
    Universalist.  You defined the essence of Wesleyan soteriology pretty
    well and I'm sure not going to argue with you on the Universalist
    perspective.  However, the true five-point (TULIP) Calvinist believes
    that a number (quantity unknown) of individuals have been preselected
    or preordained to receive salvation.  Because they have been
    preordained they WILL accept the light that is Jesus Christ and despite
    all appearances to the contrary they will be saved.  The Mediating view
    is a blend of Wesleyan and Calvinism.
    
    Kent
    
1046.16Introducing the ingredient of disparityCSC32::J_CHRISTIEUnquenchable fireWed Jan 25 1995 17:3910
What gets me is how some Christians seems to imply they have a leg up
on everybody who is not a Christian (like them).

I guess it is to be expected.  There isn't a religion in the world
wherein at least some of the devotees don't boast of it as the superior
one or the only true religion.

Shalom,
Richard

1046.17CSC32::J_OPPELTWhatever happened to ADDATA?Wed Jan 25 1995 19:494
    	re .13
    
    	I think it is a matter of semantics, Jack.  We're probably 
    	saying the same thing, but from different angles.
1046.18Does God Ever Leave???STRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Thu Jan 26 1995 13:3711
      Jack,
    
        Did God reject the unbelievers?
    
        Are the unbelievers ultimately destroyed because of God's
        absence or because of His presence?  Will He have ever left
        them?
    
        God doesn't change.
    
                                                   Tony
1046.19MKOTS3::JMARTINI lied; I hate the fat dinosaurThu Jan 26 1995 14:177
    Remember Richard...One begger showing anbother begger where the bread
    is.  The Great Commission is to be implemented with the utmost
    humility!!
    
    Peace,
    
    -Jack
1046.20CSC32::J_CHRISTIEUnquenchable fireThu Jan 26 1995 14:238
>    One begger showing anbother begger where the bread
>    is.

Is this a biblical allusion?  If so, it's an unfamiliar one to me.

Shalom,
Richard

1046.21MKOTS3::JMARTINI lied; I hate the fat dinosaurThu Jan 26 1995 16:5922
 >>   Is this a biblical allusion?  If so, it's an unfamiliar one to me.
    
    In a sense it is.  One who approaces the throne of grace with a
    contrite heart.  Remember the pharisee in the synagogue with the tax
    collector?  The pharisee was self righteous and the tax collector
    couldn't even look up...all he could say was, "Lord forgive me a
    sinner"  
    
    When one looks at our nature compared to the nature of God, we are
    fearfully and wonderfully made; however, we are also poor, blind and
    wretched.  In order to stand before a Holy God, we must acquire the
    righteousness of Christ!  This qualifies me as a begger anyway.
    
    Now that I am an adopted child of God, yes I can approach the throne of
    grace confidently...yet I must never forget where I came from lest I
    become conceited and fall into sin.  
    
    Richard, when I share the good news with somebody, am I not sharing
    with one who is in the same exact condition I am in?  The condition we
    inherited from Adam?
    
    -Jack
1046.22CSC32::J_CHRISTIEUnquenchable fireThu Jan 26 1995 20:5121
.21

Jack,

>   This qualifies me as a begger anyway.

My guess is that you've never really experienced being a beggar.
    
>   Richard, when I share the good news with somebody, am I not sharing
>   with one who is in the same exact condition I am in?  The condition we
>   inherited from Adam?

It gets me how some so readily accept sin inherited supposedly all the
way back from the time of Adam, yet refuse to accept any meaningful
responsibility for the sins inherited over the last few hundred years
from our forefathers: slavery, racial disparity, and the repression of
women.

Shalom,
Richard

1046.23MKOTS3::JMARTINI lied; I hate the fat dinosaurFri Jan 27 1995 11:0439
>>My guess is that you've never really experienced being a beggar.
      
Begger...no.  But there have been times in my life when I lived quite sparsely.
I recall one time in college when I had mixed some old parmisian cheese that
you sprinkle on spaghetti with some viva Italian dressing.  That was my
dinner with absolutely no idea where breakfast was coming from.  God 
provided snow and I got a few shoveling jobs the next day...enough to buy
some food for a three day period.  

Mercy must be obtained in order for grace to abound.  This is why we must 
approach the throne of grace with a contrite heart.  "I desire mercy not
sacrifice."  The term begger is a generic term.  It is only to illustrate our
need before the savior.
  
>>It gets me how some so readily accept sin inherited supposedly all the
>>way back from the time of Adam, yet refuse to accept any meaningful
>>responsibility for the sins inherited over the last few hundred years
>>from our forefathers: slavery, racial disparity, and the repression of
>>women.

Richard, that gets to me too.  That's why I am a firm believer in equality 
for **ALL** individuals in society.  Parity in the workplace is a worthy
goal to strive for.  Adament opposition to the status quo does not imply 
resistence to change.  Like I said, equality FOR ALL individuals in society,
applying the same standards and striving to meet them.  As I've stated over
and over, handouts (as well intentioned as they are), promote mediocrity 
and foster dependence in society.  We are doing our fellow Americans absolutely
no favors.

I fully accept the sins of my forefathers in all these areas.  But regardless
of how evil society is today or how evil society was 200 years ago, it is
mutually exclusive from our condition handed down through Adam.  If anything
the behavior of my forefathers and myself confirm what I have said about our
sin condition and the need for the savior!
  
Peace,

-Jack

1046.24CSC32::J_CHRISTIEUnquenchable fireFri Jan 27 1995 21:0312
Note 1046.23

>The term begger is a generic term.  It is only to illustrate our
>need before the savior.

To a beggar, the term beggar is hardly a generic term.

As for the rest, well, please don't misconstrue my silence.

Shalom,
Richard

1046.25MKOTS3::JMARTINI lied; I hate the fat dinosaurMon Jan 30 1995 09:204
    Well...how about one thirsty person showing another thirsty person
    where the oasis is!?
    
    -Jack
1046.26save water, drink beer ;-) DECALP::GUTZWILLERhappiness- U want what U haveMon Jan 30 1995 09:514
which oasis? what kind of thirst? 

;-)
1046.27MKOTS3::JMARTINI lied; I hate the fat dinosaurMon Jan 30 1995 10:042
    Wellll...not the oasis run by Spuds McKenzie!!! :-)
    
1046.28you'd be awfully thristy!BIGQ::SILVASquirrels R MeMon Jan 30 1995 11:123

	That's good, cuz spuds died.....