T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
969.1 | Too generalized | DNEAST::DALELIO_HENR | | Thu Sep 15 1994 07:24 | 16 |
|
I think its a good thought, but from my point of view I would question
whether it should be part of the baptismal ceremony.
Its a very subjective question. The person might see abortion (for instance)
as a violation of the "foetus" life and feel compelled to picket an abortion
clinic. On the other hand they might want to march in a gay rights parade.
Its too general as it appears.
Are infants baptised in the UMC, do the godparents answer for the infant?
If so, will the infant have opportunity to confirm the vicarious committment
at their confirmation?
My thoughts
Hank
|
969.2 | | POWDML::FLANAGAN | I feel therefore I am | Thu Sep 15 1994 10:14 | 7 |
| Richard,
That is a wonderful statement to include in the UMC ritual.
Is that a standard part of the UMC baptism ritual.
Patricia
|
969.3 | curious | LGP30::FLEISCHER | without vision the people perish (DTN 297-5780, MRO3-3/L16) | Thu Sep 15 1994 10:30 | 16 |
| re Note 969.0 by CSC32::J_CHRISTIE:
> One of the questions asked during the ceremony of baptism in the United
> Methodist Church is this:
>
> "Do you accept the freedom and power that God gives you to
> resist evil, injustice, and oppression
> in whatever form they present themselves?"
How long has this statement in this form been a part of the
rite?
(It sounds kind of "modern" -- and I hope you know me well
enough to know that I mean no criticism in this respect.)
Bob
|
969.4 | a principle is like that | LGP30::FLEISCHER | without vision the people perish (DTN 297-5780, MRO3-3/L16) | Thu Sep 15 1994 10:37 | 20 |
| re Note 969.1 by DNEAST::DALELIO_HENR:
> Its a very subjective question. The person might see abortion (for instance)
> as a violation of the "foetus" life and feel compelled to picket an abortion
> clinic. On the other hand they might want to march in a gay rights parade.
> Its too general as it appears.
I think that part of its power is its generality.
It sets a principle, rather than laying out detailed rules.
As a principle it calls on the Christian to thoughtfully and
prayerfully consider how God calls them to live out this
principle in the life they have been given.
Of course principles can be misapplied, but even 100-page
legal documents can be misapplied! That is the nature of
natural language (and which is why brevity is often a
virtue).
Bob
|
969.5 | | CSLALL::HENDERSON | I'm the traveller, He's the Way | Thu Sep 15 1994 11:01 | 16 |
|
RE: <<< Note 969.0 by CSC32::J_CHRISTIE "Crossfire" >>>
-< Resist evil, injustice and oppression >-
>How would you take it?
I'd say thank you very much and walk out. I don't see such a requirement
in any Biblical baptism.
Jim
|
969.7 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Crossfire | Thu Sep 15 1994 13:27 | 18 |
| .1
> Are infants baptised in the UMC(?),
Yes.
>do the godparents answer for the infant?
Parents, usually, and others present willing to accept the responsibility.
> If so, will the infant have opportunity to confirm the vicarious committment
> at their confirmation?
Yes, at confirmation.
Shalom,
Richard
|
969.8 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Crossfire | Thu Sep 15 1994 13:40 | 15 |
| .3
> How long has this statement in this form been a part of the
> rite?
To be perfectly honest, I don't know. It is included in the relatively
new hymnal (less than 10 years old, as I recall).
Resisting evil, injustice and oppression is deeply imbedded in the Jewish
faith and affirmed by the gospel of Jesus Christ. Jesus didn't institute
the notion, but neither did he institute baptism.
Shalom,
Richard
|
969.9 | | CSLALL::HENDERSON | I'm the traveller, He's the Way | Thu Sep 15 1994 13:43 | 10 |
|
Hmm...I thought Matthew 28:19 mentioned Baptism (and they were Jesus'
words).
Jim
|
969.11 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Crossfire | Thu Sep 15 1994 14:07 | 11 |
| .9 Come on, Jim! Pay attention! I didn't say Jesus didn't
advocate baptism! Reread what I said.
Furthermore, there's no small argument as to whether Jesus meant
baptizing (immersing, as with water) people in the name of Father,
the Son and the Holy Spirit, or whether he meant baptizing them
(in water) in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy
Spirit. But this is grist for another topic.
Shalom,
Richard
|
969.14 | | CSLALL::HENDERSON | I'm the traveller, He's the Way | Thu Sep 15 1994 14:53 | 12 |
|
RE .11
My apologies for misunderstanding. Who, then, instituted Baptism?
Jim
|
969.15 | Unclear | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Crossfire | Thu Sep 15 1994 15:08 | 8 |
| According to a course I took in New Testament history a few years
back, the ritual of baptism was practiced by some Jews and can be
found in other religions, including some of what were called the
'Mystery Religions'.
Shalom,
Richard
|
969.16 | I disagree, but.. | CSLALL::HENDERSON | I'm the traveller, He's the Way | Thu Sep 15 1994 15:10 | 3 |
|
Oh.
|
969.18 | I won't try to change your mind. I promise. | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Crossfire | Thu Sep 15 1994 16:11 | 3 |
| .16 You disagree? On principle? Because you don't like me, or what
I believe, or have to say?
|
969.19 | | CSLALL::HENDERSON | I'm the traveller, He's the Way | Thu Sep 15 1994 16:16 | 8 |
|
I believe that God institued the ordinance of Baptism..
Jim
|
969.21 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Crossfire | Fri Sep 16 1994 13:10 | 6 |
| .20 Believe me, I didn't plan it that way. At least it's still
tangentally related to the basenote.
Shalom,
Richard
|