T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
951.1 | My own answers to Brother Bubba's questions | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | The rocks will cry out! | Mon Jul 11 1994 16:26 | 38 |
|
Jerry,
While I'm flattered that you've chosen to ask me, I'm hesitant to
say that I have the absolute answer on this or any question. With that
disclaimer, allow me to share my perspective:
>He asked me if there was any Biblical substance to the theory that the
>father will suffer for the ills of his child, or that the child will suffer
>for the ills of his father.
There's some biblical support for the notion of God punishing descendants for
the sins of their fathers. However, Ezekiel chapter 18 stands in direct
contradiction to this notion, citing individual responsibility as central.
I've never heard of it working in reverse, except that it seems to be a poor
reflection on the parent when the children are out of control (Timothy and
others, I think).
>Any time someone says "God damn" we tend to flinch and say "don't take the
>Lord's name in vain". She said that in the "original" form the admonition of
>not taking the Lord's name in vain was intended to mean that one should not use
>the Lord's name to give "substance" or "weight" to that which had no substance
>or weight - dont' try to raise something to a higher status just by using the
>Lord's name - THIS is using the Lord's name in vain. Is she right?
First of all, "God" isn't really the Lord's name. Neither is "Lord." These
are descriptions or titles. I would agree, at least partially, with her,
though I confess, I have little idea about the origin. I think the last
chapter of Jonah gives no small insight into the impulsive use of curses.
To me, the commandment about using the Lord's name in vain is connecting
the name of the Holy One with vulgarity, referring to God abusively,
disrespectfully, and/or irreverently; essentially "cheapening" or even
diluting the name of God.
Shalom,
Richard
|
951.2 | | AIMHI::JMARTIN | | Mon Jul 11 1994 16:41 | 15 |
| The passage that came to mind was how King Davids offspring with
Bathsheba did die as a result of David's sin with her. You might say
the child was denied life because of the sins of the father. Also in
Corinthians it does state that by one mans sin death passed to all
mankind, for all have sinned. However, eternal seperation can only be
based on the heart of that one individual, not on the heart attitude of
the father or the son.
"Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain." I always
believed this referred to cursing and using a phrase like, "God damn"
I learn very recently however that this commandment was written in
relation to vows we make to one another, then breaking them. By
breaking your vow you are taking the name of the Lord in vain.
-Jack
|
951.3 | Summer or Not | JULIET::MORALES_NA | Sweet Spirit's Gentle Breeze | Mon Jul 11 1994 16:42 | 18 |
| I have a question, is it legal to talk about such things in a public
school environment? I really am curious. What kind of liability are
you placing yourself in by having these discussions?
But to answer your questions.
The one thing that is most interesting about this question is that
it encompasses much of how Christ changed the judicial system. In the old
testament, father's were often held responsible for their children's
behavior. And likewise, a child could suffer the consequences of a
parent's behavior.
With Christ, individual accountability became the place for justice.
With Christ, we no longer must assume the debts of our father's, as
they must stand before God on judgement day. You will not be judged
for their choices and they will not be judged for yours.
|
951.4 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | The rocks will cry out! | Mon Jul 11 1994 17:56 | 13 |
| .3 I don't think Jerry said these dialogues had taken place in a
public school environment.
I was at a burger stand the other day when a group of high school
aged kids spotted a teacher from their school enter and place an order.
The kids engaged the teacher in quite a long chat.
I'm sure, especially in smaller cities, teachers and students cross
paths all the time.
Shalom,
Richard
|
951.5 | | JULIET::MORALES_NA | Sweet Spirit's Gentle Breeze | Mon Jul 11 1994 18:06 | 10 |
| .4
Nonetheless, whether in school or not, as a teacher, he could be
placing himself in a very precarious situation with his students.
The students could claim they spoke to him at school...
Sorry for being rather paranoid, but this is 1994 and I've seen
worse injustice than in a situation like this one.
|
951.6 | so what? | LGP30::FLEISCHER | without vision the people perish (DTN 223-8576, MSO2-2/A2, IM&T) | Mon Jul 11 1994 18:24 | 11 |
| re Note 951.5 by JULIET::MORALES_NA:
> The students could claim they spoke to him at school...
>
> Sorry for being rather paranoid, but this is 1994 and I've seen
> worse injustice than in a situation like this one.
They could claim that he molested them, too -- false
accusations are *always* a hazard.
Bob
|
951.7 | parents have responsibility | JUPITR::MNELSON | | Mon Jul 11 1994 18:35 | 53 |
| Each person is accountable before God for their own actions.
Part of the responsibilities God gives a parent is to bring their
children up in their faith; that is, giving them a proper catachism
of the Christian faith and demonstrating by a holy life how to live
as a Christian.
God judges the parents in their role in bringing up the child. Only
God can adequately distinguish in the hearts and lives of parents
and children how satisfactorily each has persued their
responsibilities.
If the son in .0 was never brough up properly by his parents then
the parents will have to account for that to some degree, and
perhaps significantly, before God.
Likewise, the child will have to account for ignoring or
rejecting the many ways God, by his mercy and grace, has tried to
offer him the Truth and Way of Salvation.
Only God can truly judge, but I'm sure that many many parents in
this day and age are realizing too late that they failed to carry
our with enough vigor this very important responsibility in
regards to their children.
Such parents still have recourse to the Mercy of God. They need to
face their failed responsibility, repent and confess this to God.
Then they need to 1) pray much for their children, 2) continue
to be converted themselves [surrendered to God's Will and the
sanctification of the Holy Spirit in their lives]. Through these
things they can be a positive witness to Christ through their
conversion. In this way their child(ren) will have a good example
of the goodness of God and be open to God's grace for conversion.
It is wrong to try to mitigate the failure to bring children up
properly in faith by chastening the child as was done in .0; this
will never be successful and it will drive the person further from
God.
It is possible, on the other hand, that the parents did act
responsibly towards God and their children by proper teachings,
witness, catachists, worship, and lives of holiness. If this is
the case then the child's later rebellion from the ways of God is
not the fault of the parent.
Peace of Jesus,
Mary
|
951.8 | and not just parents | JUPITR::MNELSON | | Mon Jul 11 1994 18:56 | 32 |
| Actually, we ALL have responsibility before God for anything that
would lead another person away from God. Jesus particularly
emphasized this in the case of children. If we cause a child to
stumble in faith or morals then it would be better for us if
we had never been born!
God intended mankind to be holy as He is Holy, to be perfect as
the Heavenly Father is perfect. Sin is not a private matter; at
some point even 'private sinners' seek others to join in their
sin or seek to have others view the behavior as 'normal' rather
than as sin.
In this way sinners 'lobby' the people around them to choose a
path contrary to God's Word. This is a grave sin because it
promotes sin rather than righteousness. Such people act as
'false prophets' that lead others away from God. We will be held
accountable before God for all these things also.
We are all sinners who fall short in the sight of God. We must
live confessed and repentant lives whereby, through the Blood of
Christ we are forgiven. Then, we must seek the Holy Spirit to
keep us in Christ and to work through our lives to live a life
holy before God and a witness of Christ.
Such an ongoing Christian walk separates us from ungodliness and
helps us to better recognize such temptations to such anti-Christian
moral and values the world offers, which are sins if lived.
Divine Peace of Jesus,
Mary
|
951.9 | Ahhh....consequences! | CSC32::KINSELLA | A tree with a rotten core cannot stand. | Tue Jul 12 1994 18:20 | 31 |
| Tell Bubba Hi! I miss him.
No, of course, the dad isn't going to hell because of the son actions.
Where the dad goes depends on the dad. The one has nothing to do with
the other.
However, there are verses that take about the father's sin being
visited on his children I believe up to the 4th generation. Now this
is another thing entirely. I believe that this is true, although not
binding. There are consequences for sin. For example, a family I know
divorced years ago and the parents have a very hostile relationship.
The kids have definitely been affected by the divorce, by the ongoing
hostilities, and will continue to be shaped by those experiences the
rest of their lives. It's damaged those kids. The one boy is so
unable to express his feelings that it will be very deterimental to him
later in life. As he goes on and gets married and has kids...his not
being able to deal with his feelings will mostly likely effect them and
so on. However, I do believe that the cycle can be broken. I believe
that anyone turning to God can stop that cycle. I've had the pleasure
of watching another guy from church who comes from a very closed
non-expressive family just blossom in Christ. It's been really
beautiful to watch this metamorphosis. Yet I see his other brothers who
haven't let Christ into there hearts stuck in a cage rather than a
cocoon. It's very sad.
Also something that might be good to bring out for the kid is Ephesians
6:1-3 "Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right.
Honor your father and mother - which is the first commandment with a
promise - that is may go well with you and that you may enjoy long life
on the earth."
|
951.11 | paid in full | FRETZ::HEISER | Maranatha! | Fri Sep 09 1994 18:24 | 6 |
| > Parental curses can be very damaging.
> It was to Ham. It was to Canaan. Jacob also cursed some of
> his sons and really hurt them. For instance, 'cursed be the
> anger of....' 'Reuben shall not excel/prosper'...
Jesus' blood cleanses us of generational sin/curses too.
|
951.13 | the cure for the generational curse | FRETZ::HEISER | Maranatha! | Wed Sep 14 1994 15:02 | 3 |
| 2 Corinthians 5:17 " Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new
creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become
new."
|
951.15 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Thu Sep 15 1994 13:58 | 12 |
| You're welcome, Bro! Here's another I read last night (actually the whole
chapter is excellent!):
Romans 6:1
WHAT shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
Romans 6:2
God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?
How can a Spirit-filled being live any longer in sin?
Mike
|
951.18 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Fri Sep 16 1994 13:53 | 4 |
| Greg, I have no idea what you are talking about.
thanks anyway,
Mike
|
951.20 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Fri Sep 16 1994 17:25 | 2 |
| How is that? You were the one that asked for verses that defeat the
notion of generational curses and I obliged.
|