T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
912.1 | | CVG::THOMPSON | An AlphaGeneration Noter | Mon May 02 1994 13:49 | 6 |
|
>What comes to mind when you think of "easy Christianity"?
Liberal theology.
Alfred
|
912.2 | | AIMHI::JMARTIN | | Mon May 02 1994 14:07 | 22 |
| Upholding the doctrine of Christianity:
1. Realizing Christianity is a faith based belief.
2. Accepting on that belief.
3. Being the salt of the earth. Letting your light so shine among men.
Being a living witness and showing Christ to others through your
actions, i.e. living the Spirit filled life. (Point three is moot
without points one and two.)
4. Sharing your faith with others as prescribed by the Great
Commission, (Matthew 28).
Perverting the gospel of Christianity (Easy Christianity if you will)
1. Doctrine and salvation based on self (Good works, philosophy, etc.)
2. Christ' atoning sacrifice secondary to self, (Works, philosophy,
etc.)
3. Belief in many ways to the One True God, (Nullifying the Word of
God.)
4. Basing one's eternal life on feelings and emotions (Everybody does
this from time to time.)
-Jack
|
912.3 | well, you asked... | TFH::KIRK | a simple song | Mon May 02 1994 15:11 | 15 |
| re: Note 912.0 by Richard "Peace Power Ranger"
>What comes to mind when you think of "easy Christianity"?
The type exemplified by the bumper sticker I've seen that goes
.---------------------------.
| The Bible says it |
| I believe it |
| That settles it |
`---------------------------'
Peace,
Jim
|
912.4 | | JULIET::MORALES_NA | Sweet Spirit's Gentle Breeze | Mon May 02 1994 15:15 | 5 |
| .3
That's really humorous...
|
912.5 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Peace Power Ranger | Mon May 02 1994 15:31 | 5 |
| .3 That's the closest to Bonhoeffer's answer so far.
Shalom,
Richard
|
912.6 | | AIMHI::JMARTIN | | Mon May 02 1994 15:45 | 3 |
| And I celebrate Bonhoeffer's 1st amendment right to state it!!
-Jack
|
912.7 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Peace Power Ranger | Mon May 02 1994 15:52 | 5 |
| Actually, Bonhoeffer was German. But it would be good if such
rights extended beyond the U.S. Constitution, eh?
Richard
|
912.8 | | AIMHI::JMARTIN | | Mon May 02 1994 16:14 | 33 |
| Yes, that would be great because it would essentially defuse
totalitarianism in the world. I say difuse rather than eliminate
because I see our BoR rapidly eroding.
Let's talk about this a little more: The Bible says it,
I believe it,
That settles it!
I think the meaning here is more personal than authoritarian. It shows
the bumper sticker owner to have strong convictions about this.
I know more people who may as well have this sticker on their car:
The Bible says it,
I don't believe it,
That settles it!
or
The Bible says it,
I believe some of it,
That settles it.
or
The Bible says it,
I believe what makes me feel good,
That settles it!
All four of these stickers have equal merit. Because faith is based on
free will, I can no more dislike you for your beliefs than dislike you
for choosing vanilla over chocolate ice cream.
Without reading Bonhoeffer, my opinion is that easy Christianity is one
of no conviction, no sacrifice, no foundation, and the propensity to
latch onto a label to feel good about ones self, which isn't really
Christianity at all.
-Jack
|
912.9 | We are in agreement | TFH::KIRK | a simple song | Mon May 02 1994 16:20 | 28 |
| re: Note 912.8 by Jack
Jack,
As I read it, the problem with "bumper sticker faith", even the variousone you
imagine, is that very little thought/struggle/work has been applied to the
statements.
> All four of these stickers have equal merit.
And the merit for each of them in my opinion is pretty low.
> Because faith is based on
> free will, I can no more dislike you for your beliefs than dislike you
> for choosing vanilla over chocolate ice cream.
Agreed.
> Without reading Bonhoeffer, my opinion is that easy Christianity is one
> of no conviction, no sacrifice, no foundation, and the propensity to
> latch onto a label to feel good about ones self, which isn't really
> Christianity at all.
Agreed. That is the point I was making.
Peace,
Jim
|
912.10 | just do it .-) | TFH::KIRK | a simple song | Mon May 02 1994 16:30 | 13 |
| BTW,
I have the same dislike of the "Just Say No" approach to drug use.
To me it says "don't think about it". I have no stats to back this up, but my
own observations are that that message also got tied in to beneficial drugs
and medication. Many people who could have benefitted from various drug
therapies were denied because either they or their doctors misapplied the
slogan. I am not promoting recreational use of drugs. I am promoting
thinking about it, studying it, and making a well informed choice.
Peace,
Jim
|
912.11 | me neither | TFH::KIRK | a simple song | Mon May 02 1994 16:31 | 9 |
| re: Note 912.11 by Jack,
> As you can see, I hate bumperstickers!!
You won't find any on my car! (I don't like them either.)
Jim .-)
'course, some rusty old cars are held together by bumperstickers.
|
912.12 | | AIMHI::JMARTIN | | Mon May 02 1994 16:34 | 10 |
| I agree with you Jim, from an adult point of view. I firmly believe in
substantive non wishy washing solutions. I am not a Nancy Reagan lover
by any means, but I believe the "Just Say No" campaign was taylored to
give youth a new mindset since they are more apt to cave in to peer
pressure and the like.
BTW., I am not a proponent for bumper stickers. They can actually hurt
your testimony; especially if you are a Boston driver!!!!
-Jack
|
912.13 | | PACKED::COLLIS::JACKSON | Live freed or live a slave to sin | Mon May 02 1994 16:41 | 8 |
| For Dietrich Bonhoeffer, it meant the opposite of counting
the cost and being willing to pay the price. I agree with
him.
Very few of us are like Dietrich Bonhoeffer or Keith Green.
It is understandable - but lamentable.
Collis
|
912.14 | | JULIET::MORALES_NA | Sweet Spirit's Gentle Breeze | Mon May 02 1994 16:54 | 4 |
|
.13
Please elaborate... :-)
|
912.15 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Mon May 02 1994 18:46 | 5 |
| Hitler put Bonhoeffer to death, just days before the end of WWII.
He was involved in a plot to kill Hitler.
/john
|
912.16 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Peace Power Ranger | Mon May 02 1994 19:18 | 4 |
| .15 True. In a sense, Hitler succeeded where Bonhoeffer failed.
Richard
|
912.17 | | AIMHI::JMARTIN | | Mon May 02 1994 20:03 | 17 |
| Interesting after thought. Samuel Adams is labeled in history as kind
of a mean spirited zealot who wouldn't think twice about stabbing a
redcoat. I have no idea about his religious views but it brings about
an interesting question.
Both Hitler and King George were tyrants. Hitler in my mind is in a
different league all together along with others like Stalin, Nero,
the Kings of Babylon and the like.
Nevertheless, they were both tyrants and the question is this.
Bonhoeffer plotted to kill Hitler, Peter cut off the servants ear but
was told to put away his sword. For the record, I probably would have
emulated Bonhoeffer but the question is: Regardless of Nationalism or
Religion, was Bonhoeffers stand condoned by God? How about Samuel
Adams? Does Nationalism/Religion justify the action?
-Jack
|
912.18 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Peace Power Ranger | Mon May 02 1994 21:37 | 5 |
| That Bonhoeffer opposed Hitler was to his credit. The majority of his
contemporaries did not.
Richard
|
912.19 | No Real Investment | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Copernicus 3:16 | Sat May 07 1994 14:47 | 18 |
| Easy Christianity, I think, encompasses the 'no real investment' style
of some Christians.
I see it from time to time here in CHRISTIAN-PERSPECTIVE. There are
folks who do not care to share in any meaningful fellowship. They do
not wish to reveal too much about themselves on a personal level. They
do not want to be your friend. Sometimes, they don't even want to
introduce themselves.
Like some intangible orthopedic device, they want to correct. They
want to straighten the wayward and the searching.
I can sympathize. There are only so many hours in day. You can't take
time to make friends with everyone. So, one must base one's actions on
one's priorities.
Richard
|