| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 900.1 |  | AKOCOA::FLANAGAN | honor the web | Fri Apr 15 1994 09:21 | 14 | 
|  |     So Philo by merging Hebrew and Hellenistic thought transformed the
    Judaic concept as Wisdom as the extention of God imaged as Feminine, to
    Logos as the extension of God imaged as Masculine?
    
    It doesn't stop.  Every time I discover something new, I get tons of
    new things that I need to research.
    
    But there is great joy in new discoveries.  I think the wisdom
    literature may be my next theological pursuit.
    
    Thanks Richard for the lead.
    
    
    Patricia
 | 
| 900.2 |  | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Most Dangerous Child | Fri Apr 15 1994 12:26 | 9 | 
|  |     .1 Patricia,
    
    	I'm hesitant to say that it was all that clear-cut and simple,
    but Philo was very influencial in his lifetime and immediately
    following.
    
    Shalom,
    Richard
    
 | 
| 900.3 | May have lived during same time | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Most Dangerous Child | Fri Apr 15 1994 12:28 | 6 | 
|  |     Also, interestingly, Philo may have been a contemporary of Jesus
    of Nazareth.
    
    Peace,
    Richard
    
 | 
| 900.4 |  | AKOCOA::FLANAGAN | honor the web | Fri Apr 15 1994 13:10 | 10 | 
|  |     I know that it is not simple but it is an area that is fascinating.  In
    feminist literature for instance, some feminist claim that the
    Patriarchal nature of Christianity and the tension within Christianity
    regarding human sexuality, originates form the merging of Judaism and
    Hellenism.  The absolute Hellenist duality between body and spirit, man and
    woman, light and darkness are seen as a negative influence in
    Christianity.  I'm not sure I buy the argument but I certainly want to
    understand it more.
    
    Patricia
 | 
| 900.5 |  | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Most Dangerous Child | Thu Apr 21 1994 17:04 | 15 | 
|  | Note 51.57 referring to 51.56:
>>    10.  Philo and others did not regard the Apocryphal books as
>>    inspired
>Philo was a Jew.  He didn't recognize the NT as inspired either.  Want
>to trust him?
Let's cut Philo some slack here.  Chances are that Philo, like Jesus, never
read any of the New Testament writings.  Even if he had, he would not have
known the writings would someday be up for canonization.
Peace,
Richard
 |