T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
701.1 | | CVG::THOMPSON | Radical Centralist | Fri Jun 04 1993 14:37 | 5 |
| >How often is our giving disproportionate to what we've been given?
Which way?
Alfred
|
701.2 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | We will rise! | Fri Jun 04 1993 14:54 | 8 |
| .1 Alfred,
Either way. And I'm not limiting this to monetary giving, either.
To me, the giving of time, of talent, of affection, or of resources
are all legitimate for us to consider.
Richard
|
701.3 | one does what one can | CVG::THOMPSON | Radical Centralist | Fri Jun 04 1993 14:59 | 8 |
| I give what I can, when I can. I'm not a good one to judge if what
I give is equal, less or greater in proportion to what I am given.
I feel that I give a reasonable amount. More than many less than
others. Work gets in the way of doing more sometimes. What I do know
is that I feel no guilt about what I do give. That is to say that even
do I'd like to do/give more I don't feel I'm cutting things short.
Alfred
|
701.4 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | We will rise! | Fri Jun 04 1993 19:13 | 15 |
| I used to be able to give more than I do now.
I used to serve as a hospital chaplain about 18 hours per month.
I used to serve as the president of the board of a local non-profit
organization.
I used to serve on multiple levels of the United Methodist church.
I don't seem to be able to give as much of myself anymore. I sort
of miss that.
Peace,
Richard
|
701.5 | Freely give... | CSC32::KINSELLA | Boycott Hell!!!!!! | Fri Jun 04 1993 20:17 | 27 |
| I often struggle with this. I heard a comment by a lady on the radio
once. A guy asked about tithing. Her opinion was that Jesus freed us
from strict requirements, but opened us up to a new idea of freely
giving. Her implication was that if we have the love and compassion
for others that Jesus did we would be giving more of ourselves, our
time, our money. And no she wasn't asking for donations. ;^)
I often think that I have much stuff that are luxuries that I don't
need. If I were to downscale and lead a much simpler life, I would be
free to give much more money to organizations that go beyond where I
can reach.
As for time, I've served in church most of my life in many different
capacities. I still have gotten to do everything I believe I'm capable
of doing, but it's because I'm trying to pull back and let God pick
what positions He's capable of doing through me. It's tough to do. To
be patient and just listen. I still often feel like I should be doing
something in the community, but I don't really know what.
As for openness, I don't consider myself a really open person in
general. Unless I'm really upset, then I'll talk to nearly anyone
because I use them as a sounding board. It's cheaper than counseling.
;^) But in close friendships I do open up much more. I used to
be more trusting of others, I've closed up a little over the years.
I'm more cautious now. That's good and bad.
Jill
|
701.6 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Mon Jun 07 1993 09:02 | 11 |
| I heard an interesting "twist" on the tithing approach.
I asked my dad once if he gave the recommended 10% to the church. He
said that if you count the government social programs into the
equation, that he gave far more than 10% when all the taxes were
counted. I know that some of us dislike the money we send to the
military...but...I quess that it works both ways. I would much
rather give money directly to the agencys without the government
taking/making the choices.
Marc H.
|
701.7 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Mon Jun 07 1993 10:44 | 7 |
| I feel another reply is needed. I don't want to give the impression
that I'm just a "money person"....i.e. give money and thats it.
I feel that a very important part of life in general is volunter
work. I volunter a lot of my time to the church and the community.
Marc H.
|
701.8 | | CSLALL::HENDERSON | Friend will you be ready? | Mon Jun 07 1993 10:59 | 17 |
|
I believe the Bible gives a distinction between what we give in
taxes vs what we give to God. "Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's
and unto God what is God's".
I give financially and with my time (recently more time than money) but
I want to be in a position where I can give an equal balance of each. God
has, and continues to richly bless my life and I take great pleasure in
returning whatever portion of that that I can.
Jim
|
701.9 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | We will rise! | Mon Jun 07 1993 12:09 | 6 |
| .8
In the United States of America, who is Caesar? And what exactly
belongs to Caesar?
Richard
|
701.10 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | We will rise! | Mon Jun 07 1993 12:32 | 8 |
| .6
I had a United Methodist pastor once who said that the Old Testament
says to give 10%, but the New Testament says to give 100%, and not
just to the church.
Richard
|
701.11 | | BUSY::DKATZ | Make a Little Birdhouse in Your Soul | Mon Jun 07 1993 12:52 | 5 |
| .9
Well, a fair amount of Nevada for starters... ;-)
Daniel
|
701.12 | | CSLALL::HENDERSON | Friend will you be ready? | Mon Jun 07 1993 13:15 | 16 |
|
. In the United States of America, who is Caesar? And what exactly
. belongs to Caesar?
Obviously we don't have emporers here in the USA. But I believe the
passage in Matthew is saying that what we give in taxes and what we give
to God are distinct and separate.
As we who claim the name of Christ are called to obey the laws of the land,
and as those laws call for a portion of our income to be taxed, then those
taxes belong to the government.
Jim
|
701.13 | | JURAN::VALENZA | Bungee jump in flip flops | Mon Jun 07 1993 13:26 | 18 |
| > Obviously we don't have emperors here in the USA. But I believe the
> passage in Matthew is saying that what we give in taxes and what we give
> to God are distinct and separate.
I would interpret that passage differently. I believe that the passage
is saying that *when and if* the two are separate, our response to them
should be distinct as well, and that we should give appropriately to
what each realm commands of us. But to suggest that the two realms
*never* intersect is not something that, I think, very many people really
believe. Any Christian who brings a moral consideration to bear on how
they view a public issue, and who tries to influence public policy
accordingly, is dealing with the intersection of God of Caesar as they
see it. We all know that public policy often has moral implications,
and when that happens, God and Caesar are sharing the same realm. The
question is then what we do in those situations where the realm of
Caesar and the realm of God do intersect.
-- Mike
|
701.14 | I say it's all God's | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | We will rise! | Mon Jun 07 1993 13:41 | 9 |
| I believe we are not subjects of an occupational government. I believe
that in a very real sense, we *are* Caesar. I know *I* will not abdicate
my own responsibility towards the governance of this country, a
responsibility which, I might add, the people whom Jesus was addressing
were not permitted.
Peace,
Richard
|
701.15 | pointer | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | We will rise! | Mon Jun 07 1993 13:56 | 4 |
| Also see topic 478 "Render Unto Caesar"
Peace,
Richard
|
701.16 | The difference is your heart... | CSC32::KINSELLA | Boycott Hell!!!!!! | Mon Jun 07 1993 15:39 | 10 |
|
I know for me there is a difference between my heart when I pay taxes
and give my tithes and offerings. I pay taxes grudgingly to a
government whom I mistrust to do the right thing. I give my tithes
and offerings willingly to a God I know can only do the right thing.
My church is only a tool of God's. They have responsibility in doing
what God calls them to do with that money, I have found them to be
faithful.
Jill
|
701.17 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | We will rise! | Mon Jun 07 1993 20:29 | 9 |
| Yeah, I don't know of any church that might have black budgeted (secret, hidden)
projects.
I guess Jim Bakker's dog house might fit the classification of a "pork barrel"
item, though.
;-)
Richard
|
701.18 | | TINCUP::BITTROLFF | Theologically Impaired | Tue Jun 08 1993 19:19 | 11 |
| re: Last Couple
Just a nit, you're not giving your offerings to God, you are giving them to
people acting in his name, theoretically. Now, I am not in any way implying that
your church misuses these funds, but history is full where money donated to the
church was misused and abused. I put most televangelists in that category.
A question I've wanted to ask of this group for a while is what do you think of
the Jim Bakker style of evangelism?
Steve
|
701.19 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | We will rise! | Wed Jun 09 1993 13:45 | 13 |
| .18 Steve,
I am repulsed by most televangelists. I've been accused of being
too harsh on Pat Robertson in particular, even within these hallowed Notes.
You might wanna check out topic 101 "Christianity and television".
I don't mind Robert Schuller near as much, and I actually like
Jerry Trigg, a local United Methodist preacher who appears on local TV
Sunday mornings.
Peace,
Richard
|