[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference lgp30::christian-perspective

Title:Discussions from a Christian Perspective
Notice:Prostitutes and tax collectors welcome!
Moderator:CSC32::J_CHRISTIE
Created:Mon Sep 17 1990
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1362
Total number of notes:61362

684.0. "The Image of God - A Family Resemblance?" by CSC32::J_CHRISTIE (We will rise!) Fri May 21 1993 20:08

Genesis 1:27  So God �created� man in his [own] �image,� in the �image� of
God �created� he him; male and female �created� he them.

Do you not see the family resemblance??

Shalom,
Richard

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
684.1COVERT::COVERTJohn R. CovertSat May 22 1993 01:378
C.S. Lewis explains that we are created in God's image just as a sculptor
creates a statue in his image; yet the statue is not man: for it is created,
not begotten.

Yet Jesus Christ is begotten as regards his Godhead, and is thus God, but
is created as regards his humanity, and is thus Man.

/john
684.2CSC32::J_CHRISTIEWe will rise!Mon May 24 1993 12:147
    And who are children of God? (Not related by blood, of course)
    
    And who are brothers, sisters, and mothers of Christ, not
    according to C.S. Lewis, but according to Jesus?
    
    Richard
    
684.3We are created by God, not begotten of Him. Created in His Image.COVERT::COVERTJohn R. CovertMon May 24 1993 12:195
We are, by adoption and by faith in his blood.

But we are still not begotten of the Father before all worlds, as He is.

/john
684.4CSC32::J_CHRISTIEWe will rise!Mon May 24 1993 12:234
    Personally, I was begotten (through regular channels, so to speak).
    
    Richard
    
684.5STUDIO::GUTIERREZCitizen of the CosmosMon May 24 1993 12:3612
    	When The One emerged from Its rest, 
    	it differentiated into two,
    	positive and negative, 
    	from the interplay of the two came the three, 
    	from the three came the seven, 
    	from the seven came the many.
    
    	So, in one way or another, 
    	we are all begotten from the One.
    
			Juan
684.6perhaps "beget" as we once thought it was but now know it isn'tLGP30::FLEISCHERwithout vision the people perish (381-0899 ZKO2-2/T63)Mon May 24 1993 12:4823
re Note 684.3 by COVERT::COVERT:

> But we are still not begotten of the Father before all worlds, as He is.
  
        This is an area in which the use of a common, everyday word,
        "begotten" is used in the Bible in a sense that doesn't
        really make sense.

        Throughout the physical world, there is no "begetting"
        without  somebody else "conceiving".  To "beget" without
        "conceiving" cannot happen by definition of the word.  It
        would be very much like "one hand clapping."

        So whatever the Father did before all worlds, if there wasn't
        also conception, then it wasn't begetting as we know it.

        (Of course, the usual answer is that it was "begetting" as we
        DON'T know it -- by the same token, it could also be "riding
        a bicycle" but not like we know it!)

        Is God playing fast and loose with words?

        Bob
684.7COVERT::COVERTJohn R. CovertMon May 24 1993 13:047
God the Holy Spirit, by leading us to this Trinitarian Truth, is making sure
that we understand that God the Son is uncreated with respect to his Godhead
(begotten of the Father before all worlds) but created of the flesh of the
Virgin Mary with respect to his humanity (conceived by the Holy Ghost of the
Virgin Mary).

/john
684.9CSC32::J_CHRISTIEWe will rise!Mon May 24 1993 13:4310
    .8
    
    >and therefore is an improvement
    >upon man.
    
    Of course, that wouldn't would take a great deal to achieve.
    
    ;-)
    Richard