[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference lgp30::christian-perspective

Title:Discussions from a Christian Perspective
Notice:Prostitutes and tax collectors welcome!
Moderator:CSC32::J_CHRISTIE
Created:Mon Sep 17 1990
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1362
Total number of notes:61362

595.0. "What is "exegesis"?" by LGP30::FLEISCHER (without vision the people perish (381-0899 ZKO3-2/T63)) Tue Feb 02 1993 15:54

        In Note 594.11, Collis Jackson asks: "Anyone care to exegete
        the text before coming to a conclusion?

        A sincere question:  what is "exegesis"?

        My unabridged dictionary defines it as "critical explanation
        or interpretation of a text or a portion of a text, esp. of
        the Bible."

        Bob
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
595.1ex = out of, eis = intoCLT::COLLIS::JACKSONShoot that starTue Feb 02 1993 16:1839
Exegesis:  A term used primarily in seminaries :-)

A loose definition is "interpretation".  I say "loose"
because Eisegesis is also "interpretation" and this
is the opposite of exegesis.  Eisegesis is reading into
a text a meaning, exegesis is reading a meaning out of
a text.

For example, Biblical theologies are relatively common.
There are those who believe in a covenantal theology
(2 covenants, Old and New), those who believe in
dispensations, those who believe in a one covenant theology
(former professor of mine), etc.  Although these theologies
may have originally be developed from the text, the support
for them today is primarily done by eisegesis, i.e. you
start with the theology and see if the text fits it.
Likewise, eisegesis on this passage in I Timothy would be
starting with a position such as "Women are full equals of
men and should be treated as such" will all of its ramifications
and then see how the text can be fit into that theology.  I
have read several books that take this approach.

Exegesis would simply attempt to understand the text regardless
of today's value and cultural struggles basing the understanding
instead on what is said in the text, the immediate context,
the fuller context, the knowledge of who the author was and
the historical and cultural context.

Now, there are well-respected evangelicals (who accept inerrancy)
whose views differ drastically on this passage.  I still struggle
with verse 15 (none of the possible interpretations seem too 
likely to me).  My take on verse 15, at this point, is that I
don't understand what God was trying to say in that verse (i.e.
the problem is with me and my understanding, not with God's
writing).  Of course, that is just being consistent with my
acceptance that God did indeed write the Scriptures that He
claims He did.

Collis
595.2CSC32::J_CHRISTIEPs. 85.10Thu Nov 09 1995 13:426
    The term midrash approximates exegesis in meaning.  Both mean to "pull
    out of."
    
    Shalom,
    Richard
    
595.3included the origins of "oy vey!"RDVAX::ANDREWShowling with the windThu Nov 09 1995 13:5011
    
    never one to leave well enough alone, i once took a 
    class entitled "Midrash on Midrash". and that's what
    it really was, a discussion on the interpretations of
    interpretations.
    
    and then there are the bibliographies of bibliographies,
    the indexes of indexes, etc....
    
    peter
    
595.4MidrashOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Nov 09 1995 16:271
    Isn't there a Jewish theological book by the same name?
595.5CSC32::J_CHRISTIEPs. 85.10Thu Nov 09 1995 16:344
    .4  Yes, there is.  Is it capitalized _Midrash_.
    
    Richard