T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
586.1 | Manuscript Studies | CSC32::KINSELLA | it's just a wheen o' blethers | Wed Jan 13 1993 18:51 | 20 |
|
MANUSCRIPT STUDIES by Intervarsity Press
I was introduced to this just this week. I found it to be very
interesting. If I remember right, each script is a book of the Bible.
It is typed with no paragraphs. Then you mark up the pages by circling
or underlining repeat words, phrases, contrasting words, where you
think paragraphs should go, etc...
This method although I've only done it once during this week's Bible
Study was interesting. You really started seeing some distinct themes
that you might otherwise miss in a cursory reading of the passage.
Intervarsity is mostly involved on the college campus level. I'm not
sure how to get ahold of them, but I could find out if someone wants.
Bookstores might be able to order them if they don't carry them.
Jill
|
586.2 | Inductive Study | CSC32::KINSELLA | it's just a wheen o' blethers | Wed Jan 13 1993 18:53 | 41 |
|
INDUCTIVE STUDY
I was in Zondervan's Family Bookstore last night with my boyfriend
looking for a study Bible and came across I study Bible that I thought
I would love, so I bought it. It's the International Inductive Study
Bible, NASB.
This is an interactive Bible which like the Manuscript Study can be
marked up with symbols and comments to add another dimension to
learning. Many people are visual learners, myself included. The use
of color and/or symbols to mark important words and themes will enhance
your study. For example you might use a red cross over the name of
Christ. You would then use this throughout the entire Bible.
At the beginning of each book there are any number of assignments that
help the studier:
- consider the verse around it (the setting or context)
- view the setting within the framework or message of the entire
book and in light of the author's purpose for writing the book.
- Look for how that verse or passage relates to the entire Word
of God. Scripture will never contradict scripture if you allow
context to rule over all interpretation.
Each book ends with charts that allow the studier to write the themes
for each chapter. Some chapters also have additional space based
specifically on the themes in that book of the Bible. Throughout the
Bible it is packed with timely maps, timelines, insights that
references help sections, and charts to be filled in on lessons on: The
life of Moses; Teachings about Babylon; Teachings about The Day of the
Lord, The Day of Wrath, and The Day of God; The Arrest, Trial, and
Crucifixion of Jesus Christ; The Account of Jesus' Resurrection. All
charts (historical, topical), illustrations, and color maps are
indexed.
I might use a combinations of techniques from this and the manuscript
studies to personalize to my own learning style.
Jill
|
586.3 | Well "why" before "how" | MORO::BEELER_JE | Johnny Paycheck time ... | Fri Jan 15 1993 02:48 | 3 |
| Serious question ... why does one "study" the Bible?
Bubba
|
586.4 | | SDSVAX::SWEENEY | Patrick Sweeney in New York | Fri Jan 15 1993 08:00 | 1 |
| Why does one study anything?
|
586.5 | To feed the spirit, and enrich the soul | VIDSYS::PARENT | a new day, a new woman | Fri Jan 15 1993 09:11 | 13 |
| < <<< Note 586.4 by SDSVAX::SWEENEY "Patrick Sweeney in New York" >>>
<
< Why does one study anything?
Question of the ages. The logical answer is to attain greater
understanding. I believe studying the Bible is an experience for
the mind and soul greater in some respects than Shakespeare or Homer.
Studying makes the underlying messages available.
Allison
|
586.6 | follow up | APACHE::MYERS | | Fri Jan 15 1993 09:16 | 16 |
| I was thinking about Jerry's question of why one studies the Bible and
I must admit that I have the same question. I've studied
semi-conductor theory, but I haven't studied a *text* on semi-conductor
theory. I was thinking that if I studied a particular text I would
have a greater understanding of how a text book is constructed, but not
necessarily a greater understanding of the topic of the text. In light
of Jerry's question I'm wondering if a study of the Bible would give
the student a greater insight into God, or just a lesson in the
construct of the biblical text.
In other words, does studing the words in the Bible lead to insight into
the Word of the Bible?
An honest question...
Myers
|
586.7 | | SDSVAX::SWEENEY | Patrick Sweeney in New York | Fri Jan 15 1993 09:54 | 12 |
| It may be an honest question, but .6 is a sophist answer.
The analogous answer is that Christian Perspective is not a conference
discussing the Christian Perspective, but a conference discussing how
people discuss the Christian Perspective.
The motivation for studying the Bible is either based upon faith (ie
that it is the word of God) or curiosity (ie that this book is what
billions believe to be the word of God through the centuries).
The consequnce of studying the Bible might be the conversion experience
that Dave Dawson speaks so much of, or it might bore one to sleep.
|
586.8 | The bible shows the way to go to heaven. -- Galileo | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Fri Jan 15 1993 10:11 | 53 |
| >The consequence of studying the Bible might be the conversion experience
>that Dave Dawson speaks so much of, or it might bore one to sleep.
In the following, my favorite modern day Boston Christian speaks of his
original motivation for studying the Bible and his conversion experience:
I became a believing Christian when I was in college, and it happened
in a night, actually in little more than an hour. I was studying for
a quiz in a course on the New Testament. I took the course in the first
place to be able to refute the claims of Christianity. The point of the
quiz was to see if we had mastered certain information on the eighth
chapter of St. Mark's gospel. When I sat down to study for that quiz
at 8 p.m. at my library carrel, I conceived that it was possible for a
reasonable person to believe in God, although I did not think that I did.
When I arose at 10 p.m., I was shaking, because I had passed from
information to an encounter with the living Christ, whose words reached
to the depths of my soul -- "He who would save his life will lose it, and
he who loses his life for my sake and the gospel's will save it. For what
does it profit a man, to gain the whole world and forfeit his life? For
what can a man give in return for his life?" (Mark 8:34-38)
Friends, that is only one story of grace in one human life.
Little did I ever imagine, 25 years ago, that I would be sharing Jesus
Christ with you here and now. [Thank heavens, God only shows us such
things gradually, not all at once!] But what matters is that you are
here, no doubt for many human reasons, and we are celebrating the one
living Christ. It is my happy commission to welcome you in His Name, and
I invite you to do exactly what St. Peter did. Actually, I'm making an
"Altar Call." In this Church, we do this so often we hardly notice it,
because at the Advent, we have Mass every day! But this day it's very
special.
Come to the Altar. Make your Communion. Do it, not just to take a
little bread and wine in fellowship, but to receive the living Body and
Blood of the risen Lord. Ask God to help you discern the mystery. And
then you can say right along with Peter and the first witnesses, "We ate
and drank with him after he rose from the dead." Alleluia. Christ is
risen! The Lord is risen indeed! Alleluia.
Praise God for the grace he sends forth upon those who honestly seek God in
their study of the Bible. And even on those who begin their study for other
reasons!
Let these words have the same effect on you as they had on Fr. Mead, have
had on me, and can have on billions of other Christians. Let these words
reach to the depth of your soul:
"He who would save his life will lose it, and he who loses his life for
my sake and the gospel's will save it. For what does it profit a man,
to gain the whole world and forfeit his life? For what can a man give
in return for his life?" (Mark 8:34-38)
|
586.9 | | DPDMAI::DAWSON | t/hs+ws=Formula for the future | Fri Jan 15 1993 10:22 | 24 |
|
I find the Bible expands what I feel Christ has done
internally.
I once taught a class on how to teach the Bible to a group
of sunday school teachers. One thing I used to always hit hard on was
to read the verses "in context". Sometimes it necessary to back up
several verses or chapters and sometimes even books to fully understand
what God is trying to show you.
I have also found that there are temporal blessings in the
Bible that can sometimes confuse the student. The only way to relate
this is to read a verse and understand it to the best of your ability.
Then put it down for a period of time and then come back to it and read
it again. Many times the "meaning" will be slightly different as God
apply's these verses to your heart.
John McAuthur recommends that you read a "small" book all
the way thru in one sitting...and do that same book that same way every
day for 30 days. I've done this and the last two weeks of read brings
out some amazing things.
Dave
|
586.10 | | JURAN::VALENZA | Preserving our noting heritage. | Fri Jan 15 1993 10:43 | 13 |
| Eric, my answer to your question would be to suggest that an
alternative to your analogy of semi-conductor theory. Semi-conductor
theory is a hard science, and *how* it is expressed is not germane to
what is expressed. But to help me understand the rich and complex
textures of, for example, a great work of literature, the library is
full of secondary texts. In fact, when I finished reading
Dostoyevski's "The Brothers Karamazov" a year and a half ago, I went to
the library and read some works *about* the novel, just to help me gain
some additional insight. I think that the rich and complex textures
and nuances of the Bible can be brought to light with the help of
scholarship, commentary, and historical background.
-- Mike
|
586.11 | Sophistry vs. Boorism | APACHE::MYERS | | Fri Jan 15 1993 11:24 | 28 |
|
Pat,
While my arguments may be faulty, I object to the characterization of
sophistry which, above and beyond implying fault, implies that I was
misleading. What's the problem with saying "I understand what your
saying, but I think you may have misunderstood what people mean by
'Bible study'".
Speaking generally now:
Look, if I say that I'm asking an honest question I mean it. If I say
I'm being sarcastic I mean it. If I say I'm a little testy, or
confused or frustrated I mean it. For what it's worth, the high handed
way that some people reply to ill worded, or even ignorant, questions
does nothing but turn me off to the notion of a traditional Christian
Perspective.
Mike,
I was more curious about the Bible study technique that would eschew
the use of commentaries and other theological writings and focused on
the Bible as being self-interpretive. But I am speaking only from my
limited exposure to "Bible studies", which was not a real positive
emotional or intellectual experience.
-- Eric
|
586.12 | A serious question indeed!!!! | CSC32::KINSELLA | it's just a wheen o' blethers | Fri Jan 15 1993 12:14 | 29 |
|
Why does one "study" the Bible?
Well Bubba, here's how I would explain it. When one of your children
comes in your room in the middle of the night because they need you and
they say "Daddy" or whatever...you recognize their voice because you
have a relationship with them because you interact with them on a
daily basis. You see their character and their behavior. You know
what makes them happy, sad, and angry. In a sense by spending time
with them you study your children so that you know how to respond to
them.
Or another example would be a best friend. Best friends talk alot.
They become in tune with one another. Knowing the others thoughts
and desires. But to get to this point it takes some effort. Good
friendship are built.
This is why I study the Bible. It's God's description of who He is.
I want to know His voice. How can you know His will without knowing
His voice? I want to know the One who saved me and gave His life. To
be so close to Him that all my life becomes a testimony of my Savior's
grace and love. So that I can stand before the Father one day and here
Him say "Well Done." I have alot of studying to do.
Jill
P.S. I should give credit where credit is due. A couple of lines
in the last paragraph are borrow from one of my favorite songs called
"Heart's Cry" by Stephen Curtis Chapman.
|
586.13 | Pointer | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Peace Warrior | Fri Jan 15 1993 12:24 | 4 |
| Note 587 is dedicated to the question "Why study the Bible?"
Richard
|
586.14 | Secondary material. | CSC32::KINSELLA | it's just a wheen o' blethers | Fri Jan 15 1993 12:39 | 18 |
|
Mike brought up the technique of using secondary material, such
as commentaries, other writings, even study Bibles could be
included in this. While I do sometimes use reference material
to check where towns were or getting a description of something
used in ancient times, I do not like to rely too heavily on
secondary material for interpretation.
How I do think it might be very interesting to do some historical
studying of the time period that the Bible was written in. I have
been reading a book by a scholar, studier, and interpreter of the
documents making up the Bible. This is a man that has studied
some of the Dead Sea scrolls. His name escapes me now, something
like Carsten Thiene. But anyway, he brings up alot of historical
evidence that surrounds biblical times and I found it extremely
interesting.
Jill
|
586.15 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Peace Warrior | Fri Jan 15 1993 12:48 | 17 |
| For being a former Methodist, I find it somewhat ironic that my own Bible
study is less than methodical:
I almost invariably pray that the Holy Spirit will guide my understanding.
I'm more inclined to read the New Testament over the Old Testament.
I frequently read a Commentary in parallel to Scripture.
I frequently check the wording of other versions.
I read other books which provide context (historical, cultural, etc.) to
the various writings of the Bible.
Peace,
Richard
|
586.16 | Oh Good! | CSC32::KINSELLA | it's just a wheen o' blethers | Fri Jan 15 1993 13:11 | 5 |
|
Excellent Richard. Do you have any recommendations for books
giving historical and cultural context?
Jill
|
586.17 | " " | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Peace Warrior | Fri Jan 15 1993 13:29 | 16 |
| Er...forgive my mental blank here, Jill. (.16)
I particularly enjoyed a book called "The Book About the Book." I do not
recall its author.
There's another which was written by an Episcopal priest which contributed
much to my overall understanding of the Bible. I don't recall his name, nor
the name of the book.
There's usually a large section of public libraries devoted to expanding
one's understanding of the Bible. One's church might also have a lending
library, though it's been my experience that most of these are sorely lacking.
Peace,
Richard
|
586.18 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Peace Warrior | Fri Jan 15 1993 14:11 | 10 |
|
Two more books:
"Understanding the Old Testament," McKee (and other contributing authors)
"Understanding the New Testament," McKee (and other contributing authors)
Peace,
Richard
|
586.19 | | CSC32::KINSELLA | it's just a wheen o' blethers | Fri Jan 15 1993 14:44 | 4 |
|
Thanks, I'll try to get ahold of some.
Jill
|
586.20 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Mon Jan 18 1993 07:50 | 12 |
| I too have questions on "why study the bible"?
I think that the term "study" is used to recognize that you can't just
pick up the Bible and start reading it....rather, you need good
reference material to help explain the history and general layout
of the bible. Then, when you start reading the bible, with the study
guides , the meaning and purpose of the bible comes out.
I like the book "Introduction to the Bible". Good replies, minus
the usual, predicted C-P putdown.
Marc H.
|
586.21 | Study to show thyself approved... | CSC32::KINSELLA | it's just a wheen o' blethers | Mon Jan 18 1993 14:27 | 13 |
|
Marc,
I agree. I believe simply reading the bible is a way of studying
it. I think reading a passage several times can bring alot out.
I also think that memorizing scripture can be very helpful. But
we all have different learning styles and it does not hurt to
apply the knowledge of how we learn personally to study the Word
of God. Actually, I believe that it's good to use many methods
from meditating on a passage to doing a detailed analysis of the
text. Both are profitable for learning.
Jill
|
586.22 | Pray-Read the Word of God | LEDS::LOPEZ | A River.. proceeding! | Tue Jan 19 1993 09:31 | 7 |
|
I found the very best way to take in God's Word is to pray over the
verses. Take a single verse or two and word by word send it back to God
via prayer. Try this with Galatians 2:20 sometime soon.
Ace
|
586.23 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Tue Jan 19 1993 13:29 | 1 |
| A very important verse to pray over, Ace.
|