T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
529.1 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Tue Oct 06 1992 19:52 | 1 |
| Our relationship with God.
|
529.2 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Keep on loving boldly! | Tue Oct 06 1992 20:59 | 11 |
| I agree with .1.
Let me add -
o Our ability to laugh
o Our ability to blush
o Our sense of modesty
o Our potential to destroy our environment
Peace,
Richard
|
529.3 | | SOLVIT::MSMITH | So, what does it all mean? | Wed Oct 07 1992 10:46 | 3 |
| Our ability to think in abstract terms.
Mike
|
529.4 | handedness | TFH::KIRK | a simple song | Wed Oct 07 1992 11:27 | 46 |
| Interesting question. My short answer is "less and less than we thought".
I agree with John in .1 here, I think. Though I see a possible sense of
meaning wherein my relationship with God distinguishes me from John and his
relationship with God or Richard and his relationship. In that sense a
relationship with God distinguishes every living entity from every other. I'd
also say that in some way all creatures have a relationship with God, as they
are all God's creations, and dependent on God for their existence, but
certainly humans (both male and female) are the only ones created explicitely
in God's own image.
I do believe that some animals have a sense of right and wrong, through
observation of the antics of my cats and their reaction when I enter a room.
(though that may have more to do with the cat's relationship with me than with
God .-)
I'll add handedness to the list of differences.
Homo Sapiens are the only known creatures that are predisposed to prefer one
hand (the right) over the other. (Among dogs, cats, and monkeys, for example,
about � are ambidexterous, and of the remaining �, there is an even split
between right and left hand preference (in tests of retrieving a ball from an
opening large enough for a single hand, for example).)
I'd question some of the other differences as well.
Elephants, for example, have an astonishing ability to destroy environments
(admittedly not as efficiently as humans).
Some primates have demonstrated a natural ability to play tricks on others of
their kind and laugh at the result (a sense of humor); they can even blush, I
believe. Some also demonstrate a natural ability to make and use tools, (for
example, breaking off reeds and fashioning them into straws used to suck out
ants from ant hills) which I think would require the ability to think in
abstract terms.
Several years ago, our ability to use language was seen to be a catagorical
difference, until some primates were able to learn American Sign Language.
More recently grammar was believed to be a higher level difference, however
there is evidence that some of the signing primates do possess a rudimentary
grammar.
Peace,
Jim
|
529.5 | | VIDSYS::PARENT | it's only a shell, mislabled | Wed Oct 07 1992 11:43 | 10 |
|
I saw some interesting things, one however seems to be missed.
Humans have a concept of self, we to the best of our knowledge are
self aware. I suspect but cannot prove that we are also the only
animal that ponders about our ability to think and have such awareness.
Peace,
Allison
|
529.6 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Oct 07 1992 12:09 | 3 |
| Humans are the only ones who kill for fun.
Marc H.
|
529.7 | | CVG::THOMPSON | Radical Centralist | Wed Oct 07 1992 12:19 | 5 |
| > Humans are the only ones who kill for fun.
Not true. Cats have been shown to kill for fun.
Alfred
|
529.8 | | DEMING::VALENZA | Support Judeo-Buddhist values. | Wed Oct 07 1992 12:19 | 9 |
| I wonder if that's true, Marc. The way cats often play with and
torture mice and birds that they capture, and then when finished
killing their prey off they deposit it on the doorstep of the house,
suggests to me that killing prey can be a sort of game for cats.
I say this despite the fact that I love cats, and I would want no part
of an afterlife without them. :-)
-- Mike
|
529.9 | | DEMING::VALENZA | Support Judeo-Buddhist values. | Wed Oct 07 1992 12:19 | 1 |
| Whoops, notes collision. :-)
|
529.10 | | CVG::THOMPSON | Radical Centralist | Wed Oct 07 1992 12:34 | 6 |
| > Whoops, notes collision. :-)
And we're on the same side. Perhaps we should save those
notes. :-)
Alfred
|
529.11 | | JURAN::VALENZA | Support Judeo-Buddhist values. | Wed Oct 07 1992 12:36 | 1 |
| Perhaps we should. :-)
|
529.12 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Oct 07 1992 14:25 | 8 |
| Re: .8
Well, not to change the topic to "Cats".....
My cats do "play" with the prey, but, they do eat it or try to give it
to me as a gift. There is more just a fun part to the kill.
Marc H.
|
529.13 | | ATSE::FLAHERTY | Ro Reinke | Wed Oct 07 1992 14:45 | 10 |
| Hmmm, I agree with Alfred and Mike on this one. My cats seem to
enjoy playing with the prey. Some will eat it after, some will not.
They've given up trying to make a gift to me of the 'kill'; my
screaming must have turned them off.
I've also seen cats display other human characterics such as kindness
for each other.
Ro
|
529.14 | Sadly ironic... | CSC32::KINSELLA | it's just a wheen o' blethers | Wed Oct 07 1992 15:35 | 9 |
|
There are laws fully protecting the fertilized eggs of many animals
throughout the entire gestation period, human eggs don't have that
protection.
Perhaps this is part of the human's ability to destroy it's
environment or perhaps that we enjoy killing for fun. ;^(
Jill
|
529.15 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Set phazers on stun | Wed Oct 07 1992 15:48 | 6 |
| I wish I could say that humans were the only animals who go to
war, but that's not true.
Peace,
Richard
|
529.16 | universal | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Pacifist Hellcat | Thu Nov 25 1993 16:12 | 5 |
| ...culture which finds expression through art. This seems to be
universal among humans and exclusive to humans.
Peace,
Richard
|
529.17 | One major thing... | LEDS::LOPEZ | A River.. proceeding! | Fri Dec 17 1993 22:14 | 6 |
|
...the human spirit.
regards,
ace
|
529.18 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Ps. 85.10 | Mon Dec 18 1995 12:29 | 5 |
| The ability to establish contractual agreements.
Shalom,
Richard
|
529.19 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Psalm 85.10 | Wed May 08 1996 14:31 | 5 |
| Humans can find meaning in that which otherwise might not have meaning.
Shalom,
Richard
|