T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
422.1 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Peace: the Final Frontier | Thu Mar 19 1992 23:00 | 16 |
| Dave,
I am probably the last person you'd want advice from. I've got
kind of a reputation as an unorthodox Christian, and that's putting it
mildly.
I think struggling with doubts is sometimes a healthy thing.
Doubts prevent stagnation and indicate that you are really thinking,
instead of simply absorbing.
I would recommend going to the living God with your doubts
and questions. I don't know anyone who ever found soul satisfying
answers elsewhere.
Peace,
Richard
|
422.2 | | DEMING::VALENZA | Life's good, but not fair at all. | Fri Mar 20 1992 01:06 | 7 |
| Dave, I think you have a healthy understanding that sometimes the pat
answers just don't cut it. I can't offer any answers to your
questions; I do think that ultimately you have to resolve them in the
way that best suits you. Whatever you do, don't stop thinking. In
some ways, I think that can be the worst sin of them all.
-- Mike
|
422.3 | | DPDMAI::DAWSON | Ok...but only once | Fri Mar 20 1992 05:59 | 13 |
| RE: .1 & .2 Richard and Mike,
Thank you for your reply's. Its been a struggle and I've
been thru all the "pat" answers. My faith in God and Jesus is without
a doubt. I *KNOW* that I am saved through the blood of Christ. But
I've really been convicted lately that I need to stop worshiping the
Bible or the Church and worship the only living God. If my God only
resided in a book or a place, I couldn't place my faith in him as I do.
I believe thats a very important distinction.
Dave
|
422.4 | one person's beliefs | OLDTMR::FRANCEY | USS SECG dtn 223-5427 pko3-1/d18 | Fri Mar 20 1992 06:28 | 21 |
| These are my beliefs. I can not worship a God who would have babies
born into sin, ie. that the babies themselves were sinners. To me this
would be a rather dispicable God. Since I believe in God and God's
goodness, I believe we can all look on the face of a new born child and
give thanks to God for this little miracle (little in size).
Sex is not sinful to me but is symbolic of the extremely intimate
relationship we have with God. Read the "Song of Solomon" for
inspiration and for the love expressed between God and yourself.
The sin of Adam and Eve to me wasn't the act of sex; it was the turning
away from God - that is our sin today and I believe we all are
participants in this world as sinners. But, the Good News is that
Jesus the Christ freed us from our sins once and for all and we are
free to be ourselves. Love God and love one another - this is our
offering to the Holy One.
Shalom,
Ron
|
422.5 | | RUBY::PAY$FRETTS | Will,not Spirit,is magnetic | Fri Mar 20 1992 08:20 | 8 |
|
RE: .0
Gee Dave, maybe more people should think as much as you do! ;^) I've
had many of the same questions as you do and have 'voiced' them in
this conference here and there.
Carole
|
422.6 | | RUBY::PAY$FRETTS | Will,not Spirit,is magnetic | Fri Mar 20 1992 08:22 | 6 |
|
Oh, and in addition to 'thinking', let's make sure we are also
'feeling' as well!
Carole
|
422.7 | | YERKLE::YERKESS | bring me sunshine in your smile | Fri Mar 20 1992 09:05 | 82 |
| re .0
Dave,
Many people I talk to have doubts like the ones you have expressed.
Many people worship the Bible and not the Creator this is wrong, God
has ensured the survival of the Bible today for it is the main way he
has chosen of communicating to all peoples in all the nations. The
Bible is now available in most countries in their native language and
can help people, with the aid of His spirit, to come to know God and
His will and purposes for all mankind and also how they can benefit
themselves. To begin with studying the Bible can be difficult on ones
own, so help is needed from those who have an understanding of what
is written in the Bible and who have made application of what they have
learnt.
Did God create an imperfect creature? Well, in the Genesis account we
can see that God created a perfect creature Adam and his complement
wife Eve. He put a major project ahead of the first couple, Genesis
1:28 NWT reads "Further, God blessed them and God said to them: "Be
fruitful and become many and fill the earth and subdue it, and have
in subjection the fish of the sea and the flying creatures of the
heavens and every living creature that is moving upon the earth."
Notice He commanded them to "fill the earth and subdue it" this would
mean producing offspring and extending the boundaries of the garden
of Eden until the earth would be a paradise filled with perfect
humans living in harmony with one another. However, we know from the
account in Genesis 3 that Adam rebelled against God and thus cut off
the couples source of life (this he was forwarned about if you compare
Genesis 2:17). The couple were no longer perfect and this imperfection
would be passed onto their offspring. An example to illustrate this
could be a bakers baking tray that he uses to bake loaves of bread.
The baking tray produces perfect loaves of bread each time, however
if the baking tray becomes dented then all future loaves produced
in this tray would show signs of this dent. The Greek Scriptures back
this up, compare Romans 5:12. So because we all stem from Adam and Eve,
we have all been procreated imperfect. Satan and the original couple
are the ones to blame and not God.
How can sex be bad when he created it? Sex in itself is good but only
in the confines of the marriage arrangement. Confining sex to the
married couple would be in itself be a protection to the family unit
as a whole. Sex is only frowned upon in the Bible if it is outside
the marriage arrangement.
Am I a lovable creature in Gods eyes when he cannot "look" upon sin?
On the basis of acknowledging and putting faith in Jesus' ransom
sacrifice is needed in part to be reconciled with God, 1 Timothy 2:5,6a NWT reads
"For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, a man,
Christ Jesus, who gave himself a corresponding ransom for all" Just
as Moses mediated between the Hebrews and God, so to Jesus mediates
between God and His servants today. Also, they can be looked upon
as clean in God's eyes by applying faith in Jesus' sacrifice as brought
out by the symbolic white robes being worn by a great mulititude as
mentioned in Revelation 7:9,13,14 and are spoken as coming through
a great tribulation (sometime in the future) because of their putting
faith in Jesus' sacrifice; the symbolic language discusses washing
their robes white in the blood of the Lamb.
John 17:3 NWT tells us how mankind can gain everlasting life and thus
gain what Adam had lost, it reads "This means everlasting life, their
taking in knowledge of you, the only true God, and of the one whom
you sent forth, Jesus Christ."
whats the point? If we don't try to listen to what God is communicating
to us through the Bible then we will not benefit from it. As Jehovah
to told his Israelites in Isaiah 48:17b-19 "I, Jehovah, am your God,
the One teaching you to benefit [yourself], the One causing you to
tread in the way you should walk. O only if you would actually pay
attention to my commandments! Then your peace would become just like
a river, and your righteousness like the waves of the very sea. And
your offspring would become like the sand, and the descendants from
your inward parts like the grains of it. One's name would not be cut
off or be annihilated from before me." He has promised everlasting life
but not just that but also life in peaceful conditions if one pays
attention to what God is saying. However, if one leaves the Bible to
gather dust on the book case then one would be breaking this line
of communication.
Hope this helps
Phil.
|
422.8 | questioning... | TFH::KIRK | a simple song | Fri Mar 20 1992 09:14 | 14 |
| Dave,
Thanks. I've had my doubts, too. Still do... I like the bumper sticker that
says "Question Authority". I question the Bible, I challenge God, not to be
defiant, not to denegrate the Word, but to come to an understanding. I've
been angered, frustrated, but untimately never been disappointed. .-)
Peace,
Jim
p.s. If you haven't, please go read the sermon that Ron recently entered.
(Next note over?) Psalm 103 which he quoted is quite relevant to this.
"God does not deal with us according to our sins..."
|
422.9 | | DEMING::VALENZA | Life's good, but not fair at all. | Fri Mar 20 1992 10:00 | 36 |
| Dave, your comment about worshiping the living God rather than the
Bible or the Church reminds me of an incident that George Fox, the
founder of Quakerism, described in his journal. He had entered a
steeplehouse, where a priest was expounding on a biblical passage and
proclaiming a doctrine about the Bible that one might today describe as
bibliolotrous. Fox wrote, "Now the Lord's power was so mighty upon
me, and so strong in me, that I could not hold, but was made to cry out
and say, 'Oh no, it is not the Scriptures', and was commanded to tell
them God did not dwell in temples made with hands. But I told them
what it was, namely, the Holy Spirit, by which the holy men of God gave
forth the Scriptures, whereby opinions, religions, and judgments were
to be tried [or tested]; for it led into all Truth, and so gave the
knowledge of all Truth." Fox was eventually hauled off to jail for
this outburst; he was quite the rabble rouser. :-)
Fox started the Quaker movement after undergoing a long spiritual
crisis. The resolution came to him when he realized that "there is
One, even Jesus Christ, who speaks to my condition". It was the living
Christ, he believed, that speaks to us today; and nothing, not the not
a church, not a priest, not even the Bible, should come between us and
God. The Bible, he believed, should be interpreted in the same Spirit
that it was written, a Spirit that dwells within us today.
You do have a starting point--the things you know in your heart, the
things that give your faith substance and meaning. As for the doubts--
well, they can be scary when most of us really do want certainty. I
think that is why some people turn to their Church or to their
interpretation of the Bible as the final arbiter on all troubling
questions. Maybe out of your doubts new answers will emerge that will
make sense to you, especially in light of what you do feel certain
about; and maybe in some cases, you will simply live with the fact that
you don't or can't know the answers. Then again, I can't help but
think that perhaps the quest for those answers can be half the fun.
Once you have all the answers, doesn't that kind of stick you in a rut?
-- Mike
|
422.10 | | VIDSYS::PARENT | another prozac moment | Fri Mar 20 1992 10:19 | 28 |
|
Thanks Dave,
Doubt has been a part of my life. Speculation as well. I left the
church (RCC) when I was young as the stuff I was feeling was in conflict
with what I was being told. I never left God, I have change the name
from time to time reflect my spritual development of the time. I've
always believed there is a benign higher power that put me her for a
reason, gave me talents, challenges to sharpen my skills. Why, I don't
pretend to know.
When I hear or read discussions "is sex bad/good" I try to understand
what the word sex means... It's a word we use for a lot of things
we do and possess within ourselves. It's a word for something we
covet, maybe to much. It certainly is a thing that is intrinsically
neither good nor bad, but ripe for misuse and misunderstanding. No
different than a food or money. I think our spritual leaders sometimes
forget the message that chocolate is a wonderful experience if you like
it, but start eating it all the time and you loose the specialness and
get fat! Is chocolate good or bad? Neither, but it can be abused
and that is bad. Religion has institionalized its models of good and
bad and forgotten the reason for models and maybe why they were good or
bad. So now I have to review them and seek my own.
Allison
|
422.11 | It can seem overwhelming at times... | COLLIS::JACKSON | The Word became flesh | Fri Mar 20 1992 10:31 | 22 |
| Re: 422.0
>How can sex be bad when he created it?
It isn't. The creation story implies that it is not when God
say that creating Eve for Adam was very good. When it speaks of
the two becoming one, it is including (if not basing) sex in
this concept. The Bible speaks very highly of marriage and children
and the marriage bed being kept pure (i.e. engaging in sex within
marriage only with one's spouse). Sexual acts simply as sexual
acts (without reference to who is doing them) are never condemned
in Scripture. Only sexual acts outside of a marriage are ever
condemned. Sexual acts within marriage are not only good, but
they can be considered a requirement (I Cor 7) for a healthy
marriage.
>He even allowed some of his old testament saints to have concubines.
This indeed is much more troublesome. However, note that God also
permitted divorce - something which he detests.
Collis
|
422.12 | | RUBY::PAY$FRETTS | a visionary activist | Fri Mar 20 1992 10:49 | 6 |
| RE: .11 Collis
Why do you think God would permit something which he detests?
Carole
|
422.13 | | SA1794::SEABURYM | Zen: It's Not What You Think | Mon Mar 23 1992 20:43 | 60 |
|
Re.0
Dave:
Not being a Christian it would be difficult to offer a you
a Christian perspective on doubt. To be frank, those who do
do not have occasional doubts scare the bejeebers out me.
So, let me put on my Zen Buddhist hat....ummm wait a minute
we don't wear hats, well...when it's cold I have this bright
red one, oh never mind, these are my thoughts on what you
have written.
As you may or may not know we practice zazen. Some people
call it meditation. We usually refer to it as just plain
old sitting. We sit and try and be present in the universe
during that moment we are sitting. It sounds simple, but it
turns out to be no easy task.
We humans always seem to have something on our minds. We worry
about things that will probably never happen. We plan make plans,
we run though things over and over again in our minds. Sometimes
this is a good thing and sometimes it is not.
Often we have doubts about things. I once read about these doubts of
ours being compared to weeds in a garden. Not much can be done about
them. You can pull them up, but you'll never get them all and
new ones will soon sprout up soon in place of the old ones.
The weeds that have been pulled up can be thrown in the compost
heap to rot down and eventually they'll do some good. Of course
in the mean time new ones will grow. With patience and steady
effort we can keep the weeds under control and even put them
to good use, but we will never be rid of them entirely.
It does not sound like you doubt the essential message of your
faith, but rather some details of theology. There is a story
about a Buddhist monk who spent years studying the Sutras trying
to find the key to enlightenment. Then one day while chopping wood
he experienced enlightenment. He ran back to his room, grabbed all
his scrolls containing the Sutras, put them in a big pile and
burned them.
Now, I am not suggesting that you go burn your Bible and your
books about Christianity, but just as Buddhism is not found in
the Sutras I suspect that Christianity does not reside on the
pages of the Bible. ( Why do I feel that I will regret writing
that ?) Rather it is the life of a Christian much the same as
Buddhism is life of a Buddhist.
Buddhists often say that what matters is that you make the best
effort in each moment. If you make the best effort to put your faith
into practice as you live each moment I do not think the abstractions
of theology or whatever doubts you have from time to time will seem
that important.
There will be some weeds in your garden, but this should not prevent
you from having a good harvest. I recall there is quotation in
Scripture about Christians being known by the fruits they shall
bear, somewhere in Matthew isn't it ?
Mike
|
422.14 | One sinners' view | SMOOT::ROTH | Networks of the Rich and Famous | Tue Mar 24 1992 00:04 | 60 |
| Re: <<< Note 422.12 by RUBY::PAY$FRETTS "a visionary activist" >>>
>
> Why do you think God would permit something which he detests?
>
I feel that God created mankind with the ability to choose between good
and evil. Sin was concieved due upon mankind's disobediance to God in the
garden. God dislikes sin but desired/desires to have the nature of His
creation unchanged- that is, the availability to us of free choice.
For God to simply force everyone to do His will would be against His
devine nature. In the O.T. He brought about laws that would reveal sin
and make it known to man... still, many resisted His call of Loving
obedience to him.
Thankfully, God revealed His perfect nature in the person of Jesus
Christ. All of the fullness of God dwells bodily within Him. [scripture
quote, location escapes me at the moment]. God made a way for sinners to
be made whole, in Gods' sight without spot or blemish... through our
acceptance of death and resurection of Jesus (by asking Him into our
lives).
Note that God does not force His way upon any... despite the appearances
of some religious zealots. In our acceptance of Jesus as saviour and Lord
we smash the barrier of sin that keeps us apart from God... we can bury
that sin which is grevious to God and be clothed in righteousness.
And, back to the original query...
Sin remains today in us all due to Adam's original choice of
disobedience. God has not short-circuited His creation plan of our having
the ability to choose... in essence, for God to put an end to sin before
the proper time he would be reniging on His original plan for man- to
have a free choice.
God's Love for mankind will be fully revealed upon Jesus' triumphant
return. He will FULLFILL His desires for mankind by once again allowing
us full, direct access to His presence- no longer will their be a need
for the Holy Spirit.
It is up to every person to choose... God has in no way nullifed that
original state in which man was created. But, just as with Adam... there
is still a penalty for sin...
I'm afraid I would fail miserably with any kind of intelectual discourse
on this topic... my heart seems to be able to expound on this topic but
my mind does not.
All I know is that when my life was a shambles I asked Jesus to be my
Lord and He entered in to my heart, never to leave me or forsake me. I
urge all to examine the scriptures carefully and use them as a light to
evaluate you present standing. Just as God does, I would like to suggest
that free choice is all yours. God bullies noone into truly accepting
Him.
I appologize for any offense that I may cause due to the posting of my
views but I stand by them 100%.
Lee Roth
|
422.15 | asking for clarification | OLDTMR::FRANCEY | USS SECG dtn 223-5427 pko3-1/d18 | Tue Mar 24 1992 07:32 | 13 |
| re: .-1
Please explain what you mean by your comments:
Sin remains today in us all due to Adam's original choice &
God has given us the freedom to choose.
Please name any example of the sin of the new born baby.
Regards,
Ron
|
422.16 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Peace: the Final Frontier | Tue Mar 24 1992 14:50 | 24 |
| The following is being posted on behalf of a C-P member who prefers to
remain anonymous.
============================================================================
Sex is not a sin. How sex is used could be a sin. If sex was not meant to
be pleasurable, then why did he give it to us? I believe that sex outside
of a committed relationship is abusing God's gift to us. It destroys
the ultimate beauty that sex can be between two people who are truly
committed to one another. Using sex for personal gain is a sin. Sex
outside of a committed relationship also deeply hurts the souls of the
people involved.
Sex is one of the most wonderful things God had given to us. However,
as with all of God's other gifts, it must be used wisely. It must not
be abused. It must not be used as a substitute for God's guidance and
love. Sadly, it is used all too often as a substitute. Sex is used to
obtain the love we are seeking in our lives, sex is used to take away
emotional pain, loneliness, emptiness. It is used to make life seem a
little bit less empty. The only thing that can make life a little less
empty and lonely is prayer and trust and faith in God.
As for the Bible, I sometimes feel it's a little too harsh where sex is
concerned. Even Paul in his writings was against marriage. There are
passages in the Bible, when kept in context, (and which I can't quote)
that give us good guidelines about sex.
|
422.17 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Peace: the Final Frontier | Tue Mar 24 1992 22:16 | 8 |
| re: .14
> Sin remains today in us all due to Adam's original choice &
> God has given us the freedom to choose.
Indeed!? You are aware that Ezekiel would take issue with this, aren't you?
Richard
|
422.18 | | SMOOT::ROTH | Networks of the Rich and Famous | Tue Mar 24 1992 22:57 | 29 |
| Re: <<< Note 422.15 by OLDTMR::FRANCEY "USS SECG dtn 223-5427 pko3-1/d18" >>>
>
> -< asking for clarification >-
>
> re: .-1
>
> Please explain what you mean by your comments:
>
> Sin remains today in us all due to Adam's original choice &
> God has given us the freedom to choose.
"Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man [Adam], and
death through sin, and in this way death came to all men, because all
sinned" Romans 5:21
> Please name any example of the sin of the new born baby.
I know of none. But the seed is there...
The inclination to sin is a part of every persons nature�. The Bible is
filled with God's word to man to turn from sin through Jesus.
Lee
�The concept of man having a sinful nature is clearly spelled out in the
Bible. This concept is rejected by many but is a fundamental truth of the
Christian faith.
|
422.19 | | CARTUN::BERGGREN | Dharma Bum | Wed Mar 25 1992 09:14 | 5 |
| Dave .0,
Knowing you, I would trust personal revelation in this matter. :-)
Karen
|
422.20 | Ezekiel?? | SWAM2::RANDALL_DO | | Fri Mar 27 1992 19:18 | 27 |
| Re: .17
Which Ezekiel is that? If you would refer to or quote or paraphrase
the passage that you mean, we could discuss it. I'd have a hard time
thinking that the Bible would contradict itself on such a basic thing
as original sin. As other notes have said, there are plenty of
examples of Biblical teaching on original sin.
Generally, we don't want to accept our sin. What helped me understand
it is to focus on the standard being used. By my standards, I'm a
pretty good guy - I work hard, don't steal, never been in jail, don't
cheat on my wife. But that's not the standard we are talking about.
God's standard comes from His nature. He is sinless and perfect, so
His standard is perfect. A choice to rebel against God once
violates this standard, and is sin. Adam did it, we all do it. If
you've ever had a newborn baby (I have 3), they do it.
It wounds our ego to think so, but each of us carries the disease, sin.
The way to get rid of it is clear - through Jesus. See Romans 3:23,
5:8.
Tell me what you all think...
Don Randall
|
422.21 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Peace: the Final Frontier | Fri Mar 27 1992 20:45 | 18 |
| Re: .20
Hi Don,
Natually, when I most want to find a specific passage, that's the time
I'm least likely to find it. However, for starters, let me provide you
with these:
Ezekiel 18.1-32
Ezekiel 33.10-20
Though not the passage I was specifically looking, both of these portions
emphasize individual responsibility - rather than inherited or "original
sin."
Peace,
Richard
|
422.23 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Peace: the Final Frontier | Mon Mar 30 1992 16:16 | 9 |
| Note 422.22
> What do I know? .-1 quotes passages that make me wonder why the sin of
> Adam was ever passed on to his children. Why did we require a savior?
Good question. As I have stated elsewhere, however, I'd be a Christian
even if salvation was not part of the package.
Richard
|
422.24 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Peace: the Final Frontier | Thu Apr 16 1992 21:41 | 5 |
| Dave .0,
How are you doing with the doubts you spoke about these days??
Richard
|
422.25 | | DPDMAI::DAWSON | Ok...but only once | Fri Apr 17 1992 11:19 | 8 |
| RE: .24 Richard,
Much better....tho sometimes they resurge....like
a tidal wave.
Thank fer askin,
Dave
|