T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
405.2 | | RUBY::PAY$FRETTS | Will,not Spirit,is magnetic | Fri Feb 07 1992 08:09 | 10 |
|
RE: .40,.41,.42
The Spirit and the Will are polarities of each other. They find
balance in the Heart and express through the Body. What we are
experiencing in the world today (and from the beginning) is an
imbalance between Spirit and Will. Therefore, there is not much
Heart presence here and Body suffers.
Carole
|
405.3 | | ATSE::FLAHERTY | That's enough for me... | Fri Feb 07 1992 08:58 | 31 |
| Carole,
Not sure if this fits in with the interpretation of the book you are
reading, but it is written in "The Song of Prayer," an extension of A
Course in Miracles:
This is what death should be; a quiet choice, made joyfully
and with a sense of peace, because the body has been kindly used
to help the Son (Daughter) of God along the way he/she goes to God.
We thank the body, then, for all the service it has given us.
But we are thankful, too, the need is done to walk the world of
limits, and to reach the Christ in hidden form and clearly seen
at most in lovely flahses. Now we can behold Him without blinders,
in the light that we have learned to look upon again.
We call it death, but it is liberty. It does not come in forms
that seem to be thrust down in pain upon unwilling flesh, but as
a gentle welcome to release. If there has been true healing,
this can be the form in which death comes when it is time to
rest a while from labor gladly done and gladly ended. Now we
go in peace to freer air nd gentler climate, where it is not
hard to see the gifts we have were saved for us. For Christ is
clearer now; His vision more sustained in us; His voice, the
word of God, more certainly our own.
This gentle passage to a higher prayer, a kind forgiveness of
the ways of earth, can only be received with thankfulness.
Ro
|
405.1 | | RUBY::PAY$FRETTS | Will,not Spirit,is magnetic | Fri Feb 07 1992 10:48 | 6 |
|
Ok Roey.....give me a little time to put these ideas into form
to post here. May not be today, however.
Carole
|
405.4 | Making the critical Christian connection | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Peace: the Final Frontier | Mon Feb 10 1992 14:17 | 15 |
| Note 405.2
> The Spirit and the Will are polarities of each other.
When the Spirit is not in sync with the (free) Will, is this sometimes
perceived as a rebeliousness on the part of the (free) Will?
Are there implications here for Christians concerning living "in the
flesh (or creature)" and "living in the Spirit"?
I'm trying to make the connection between the topic at hand and Christianity.
After all, that is the premise of the conference.
Peace,
Richard
|
405.5 | there is a connection ;') | ATSE::FLAHERTY | That's enough for me... | Mon Feb 10 1992 15:24 | 9 |
| Richard,
I'm sure that Carole can explain this better than I (I only read one of
the books in the series she's referencing), however, I do know that
Heart represents/is Jesus the Son of God in the book. Therefore, I
would say the books definitely have to do with Christ/Christianity.
Ro
|
405.6 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Peace: the Final Frontier | Mon Feb 10 1992 19:50 | 10 |
| Re: .3
Ro,
Did you "inclusify" the quote you used? My spouse, Sharon, has
been reading A Course in Miracles and its language is definately not
inclusive.
Peace,
Richard
|
405.7 | | RUBY::PAY$FRETTS | Will,not Spirit,is magnetic | Tue Feb 11 1992 07:45 | 34 |
| RE: .4 Richard
>> The Spirit and the Will are polarities of each other.
>When the Spirit is not in sync with the (free) Will, is this sometimes
>perceived as a rebeliousness on the part of the (free) Will?
Actually the imbalance between the Spirit and the Will is the
result of denial of the Will by Spirit. This denial has caused
parts of the Will to become 'lost'. Because of the separation,
the Will has not evolved along with the Spirit and incredible
emotional charge has built up. Not much Light reaches these
Will parts. This lost Will needs to be lovingly accepted so that
it can release this very old emotional charge and begin a healthy
expression.
>Are there implications here for Christians concerning living "in the
>flesh (or creature)" and "living in the Spirit"?
I see the implication being a need to no longer cut off parts of
ourselves and focus only on the Spirit. Focusing on the Spirit
may feel nice and look nice, but there are parts of ourselves
that are suffering tremendously from this lack of balance.
>I'm trying to make the connection between the topic at hand and Christianity.
>After all, that is the premise of the conference.
This surprised me a little Richard, and is the first time I've seen
you raise this question here. I'll be very happy not to pursue this
discussion if it's deemed not appropriate for this file.
Carole
|
405.8 | huh? | ATSE::FLAHERTY | That's enough for me... | Tue Feb 11 1992 10:03 | 35 |
| Hi Richard (.6),
<< Did you "inclusify" the quote you used? My spouse, Sharon, has
been reading A Course in Miracles and its language is definately not
inclusive.
I don't understand what you mean 'inclusify'? Do you mean because
the name Christ is used? Does that indicate inclusivity to you?
If so, then perhaps you are perceiving it far differently from the way
the Course defines Christ. The Course talks about there only being one
Son of God and that we are all cells in the body of Christ, we are all
part of the Sonship (as was Jesus) whether we are a 'Christian' or not.
It refers to the Universal Christ Consciousness.
How does Sharon like ACIM? How long has she been studying it? I've
been a student of the course for about four years and would really be
interested in Sharon's impressions. A couple who I am very close to
have been studying ACIM for 10 years. They are in their 80's and he is
a retired minister. They feel the Course has changed their lives and
see no conflict with Christianity and in fact find it gives deeper
insight into their faith.
Richard, have you had a chance to read any of ACIM over your wife's
shoulder? ;') Love to hear your thoughts too. From my observations,
people are either called to it or completely rebel against it.
The quote I used came from a quote in the book Return to Love,
Reflections on the Principles of A Course in Miracles. I'm not really
sure what she means by an 'extension' of ACIM.
Love,
Ro
|
405.9 | duh? | ATSE::FLAHERTY | That's enough for me... | Tue Feb 11 1992 10:14 | 8 |
| Ooooops, Richard it just dawned on me that you meant did I add the word
daughter. Yup, I did. ;')
Sorry about that (blush), you can disregard my previous note! 8^)
'cept I'd still like you to share Sharon and your impressions of ACIM.
Roey
|
405.10 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Peace: the Final Frontier | Tue Feb 11 1992 16:46 | 13 |
| Note 405.7
> This surprised me a little Richard, and is the first time I've seen
> you raise this question here. I'll be very happy not to pursue this
> discussion if it's deemed not appropriate for this file.
Carole,
On the contrary, I believe it is appropriate. I just wanted to
establish that early on. Thanks, Carole.
Peace,
Richard
|
405.11 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Peace: the Final Frontier | Tue Feb 11 1992 16:48 | 26 |
| Note 405.8
> I don't understand what you mean 'inclusify'? Do you mean because
> the name Christ is used? Does that indicate inclusivity to you?
By "inclusify" I mean use 'he/she' instead of using just 'he'. I noticed
_A Course in Miracles_ invariably spoke of God as masculine terms.
> How does Sharon like ACIM? How long has she been studying it?
Yes, she did like it. She didn't study it in the prescribed manner, but
read it through over a period of several weeks. Her only negative criticisms
were that ACIM downplayed the significance of dreams, and that for every
assertion ACIM made it seemed to also contain a corresponding counter-
assertion later on in the book.
> Richard, have you had a chance to read any of ACIM over your wife's
> shoulder? ;') Love to hear your thoughts too. From my observations,
> people are either called to it or completely rebel against it.
And one fine shoulder it is, too! ;-}
Frankly, I'm not sold on ACIM, but I am willing to listen. :-)
Peace,
Richard
|
405.12 | soft shoulder ahead ;') | ATSE::FLAHERTY | That's enough for me... | Tue Feb 11 1992 17:09 | 19 |
| Richard,
The Course is difficult to undertake or even understand for that
matter. It involves a shift in perception which enables one to focus
on Love instead of fear. I'm surprised Sharon could get through it in
such a short amount of time. I often recommend to people interested in
ACIM to read Course inspired books first, like Gerry Jampolsky's books
- specifically Love is Letting Go of Fear, or Hugh Prather's books, or
Louise Hay's books, and some others. I highly recommend Marianne
Williamson's book A Return to Love. Would love to buy 1000 copies to
gives away as Oprah did, unfortunately I could currently only afford
three! ;') I'll have to wait till it comes out in paperback to buy
more. 8^)
To me the course truly amplifies the message of Jesus and teaches a
method to practice living as he did.
Ro
|
405.13 | | SWAM1::DOTHARD_ST | PLAYTOE | Wed Feb 12 1992 15:54 | 41 |
| Re Carole's comments
Carole, I am very much pleased and in agreement with your
interpretation. I think you are well in the ball park.
In my own way of describing this phenomenon. The Spirit is from God,
is a positive/active force, promoting the progressive development, the
evolutionary growth, the increase and maturation of the human being.
As such, the human being is blessed with a Mind of their own, which has
the attribute of Will, which is a negative/passive force...as it is
written "My spirit will bear witness with your spirit..." and again, "ask
and I will come in and sup with you"...our spirit is our Mind/Will.
When the Mind/Will of Man is not conducive to the evolving/growing
forces of spirit of God within us, the connection is not made...as Paul
said, "do not GRIEVE the Holy Spirit." Life is generated by the
interaction of opposing forces, positive and negative. Essentially,
there's nothing one can proactively do to facilitate the development,
for it all happens by "grace". However, there are things we do which
hinder and/or prevent the natural/graceful development of life. For
instance, the earth and life on earth, developed and matured and
replenishes itself, naturally and gracefully, on its own without man's
or any other beings intervention--for millions of years this has been
the case. However, when Man began to take "proactive" steps towards
assisting in the development of life (ie I'm going to do this or that
to make/compel the proper development of life; which includes anything
from plant fertilizers to human vitamins) things began to go wrong in
the process of development, the "spirit was grieved".
The mystery of transformation and reincarnation is incomprehensible, in
terms of one being able to express the exact condition and whereabouts
of the spirit at death when the spirit is underdeveloped, or
undeveloped, or even almost mature (the untimely death)...however,
"Abraham was called a friend of God becaused he BELIEVED God, and it
was counted unto him for RIGHTEOUSNESS". So we are asked to do certain
things, more accurately to allow certain things to be and exist, by
God or men who know, or were inspired by God to express his Will.
Anyway, its like the "Neverending Story".
Playtoe
|