T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
259.1 | answer | SDSVAX::SWEENEY | member: Corporate Trauma Team | Fri Jun 14 1991 08:57 | 34 |
| Previous to my career at Digital, I was a person involved in the
"provision of: wells; water; housing, and other of what we consider
life's necessities, for third world countries." as a Peace Corps
volunteer. The Peace Corps was founded by President Kennedy in the
United States in 1961 and most developed countries have similar
organizations. In particular I was a rural construction specialist in
Togo, a small country in West Africa.
The role of the United States government then and I believe now is to
provide the materials for construction. The local government provides
priority sites and leadership, and the people on-site provide the
labor.
The role of large companies is typically more indirect and more
organized around capitalist ventures that have the prospects of
longer-term employment such as the creation a tourism industry where
there was none before, or the creation of a small manufacturing
capability in an area that has too many people to be used in
agriculture. As a Peace Corps volunteer I could see hotels being built
in the capital city and the Coca-Cola plant being expanded.
Large companies contribute to CARE, Oxfam, and other charities. But
not a "high proportion".
Now to analyze you question a bit:
I don't know what the "Bob Geldof" approach it. I do know that certain
events full of figures from the entertainment world create awareness
that's one millimeter deep and thousands of km wide.
But the worst part of your question is the assumption that corporations
have independent ownership of their cash. It is the shareholders money
to do with as they please. If the shareholders are inclined to be
charitable they ought to be free to choose who to give the money to.
|
259.2 | Thanks, | MEO78B::MANDERSON | Amiga + '030 == MicroCRAY | Tue Jun 18 1991 19:31 | 8 |
| Thanks for your response.
Re your last paragraph - you are trying to read too much into my
question.
Again thanks,
kevin
|
259.3 | Re: .0 | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | El Gallo de Paz | Tue Jun 18 1991 21:25 | 31 |
| > The companies or corporations should preferably be
> publically listed and probably make use of this information
> as part of their corporate marketing campaigns.
> The proportion of revenue should be at least 20% or more
> on an annual turnover of at least $5 millon."
Kevin Manderson,
Welcome! Hope you'll introduce yourself in Note 3.0.
I'm not sure I can meet the 20% criteria, but allow me to share
a couple thoughts with you anyway.
A high quality ice cream manufacturing company, Ben & Jerry's, in
New Hampshire (I think), gives a percentage of their sales to a variety of
developmental programs. Of the sales of one item in particular, Peace Pops,
2% is donated to projects which promote peace. Ben & Jerry's products are
still something of a rarity out here in the western part of United States.
Pax World Fund is a diversified mutual fund which refuses to invest
in the stock of companies which cater to the Pentagon or are integral to the
defense industry. I maintain a small tax-deferred IRA (Individual Retirement
Account) with Pax World. Note 180.1 provides more information.
I, for one, appreciate Digital's Matching Gift program. It is the
broadest, and among the most generous, corporate giving plans that I've
seen. [Yes, I'll say it....God bless Digital!]
Peace,
Richard
|
259.4 | | SA1794::SEABURYM | Zen: It's Not What You Think | Wed Jun 19 1991 09:00 | 21 |
|
Richard:
Ben & Jerry's is located in Vermont where, alas ,the cows
no longer outnumber the people.
They also market a product that part of the profits from
it are use to fund projects to preserve the Amazon rain
forest.
They have a policy that all supplies the company buys
must be sourced from local businesses if possible. All the
milk and cream used is bought from small family run farms.
Cookies, candies and such items mixed into the products
are bought from local bakers and candy makers.
Another policy they have is no manager gets a raise in
salary until all the people who work for them have been
given a raise or until they have put a development plan in place
for those who need to improve their job performance before
being given a raise
Mike
|
259.5 | Thanks for the details, Mike | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | El Gallo de Paz | Wed Jun 19 1991 22:10 | 1 |
|
|
259.6 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Full of green M&M's | Fri Jul 12 1991 23:59 | 5 |
| If you were to set up a business and based its policies on Christian
principles, what would it "look like"?
Peace,
Richard
|
259.7 | | COMET::HAYESJ | Duck and cover! | Sun Jul 14 1991 06:34 | 14 |
|
re: .6
> If you were to set up a business and based its policies on Christian
> principles, what would it "look like"?
In it's pure non-profit form, there is an excellent example. It's called:
"The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society"
Steve
|