[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference lgp30::christian-perspective

Title:Discussions from a Christian Perspective
Notice:Prostitutes and tax collectors welcome!
Moderator:CSC32::J_CHRISTIE
Created:Mon Sep 17 1990
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1362
Total number of notes:61362

62.0. "Creeds" by CSC32::J_CHRISTIE (A Higher Calling) Thu Oct 11 1990 14:05

    Why do we have creeds?  Have creeds outlived their usefulness?
    What are the positive and negative features of creeds for
    Christians living today?
    
    Peace,
    Richard
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
62.1to reaffrim our faithWMOIS::B_REINKEWe won't play your silly gameThu Oct 11 1990 14:1710
    Richard
    
    It is my understanding that the creed was a summary statement
    of what a Christian believes. I appreciate reciting the creed
    as part of the communion service on Sunday and also during
    the baptismal and confirmation service where it is done more
    as a question and answer session between the pastor/bishop and
    the congregation.
    
    Bonnie
62.2CSC32::M_VALENZAWhistle while you note.Thu Oct 11 1990 14:246
    While the Religious Society of Friends has a set of common traditions
    and practices, it does not have any creeds as such.  Personally, I am
    opposed to creeds as a matter of principle, because to me they seem to
    be a way of stifling dissent and freedom of thought.
    
    -- Mike
62.3On the Other Hand......WMOIS::REINKEHello, I'm the Dr!Thu Oct 11 1990 16:249
    re:  .2 -- stifling dissent and freedom of thought
    
    That's one pole -- and one I prefer -- but don't you think that if
    one's life were continually filled with the kind of controversies this
    file has already witnessed that one would yearn for just getting down
    to business?  It this not a matter of in-breath and out-breath, wherein
    creed-thinking is perhaps in-breath and freedom out-breath?
    
    DR
62.4CLOSUS::HOEDaddy, can I drive the Lancia?Thu Oct 11 1990 16:348
To me, the creed is the basis of common reference from which our
denomination comes from. The creed is the statement that I have
these basic beliefs. Stifling? Yes indeed, especially if you try
to add to the statement or detract from it. For instance, some
folks do not believe in the Trinity of God or the Virgin birth of
Christ.

calvin
62.5YesCARTUN::BERGGRENPlease, don't squeeze the shaman...Thu Oct 11 1990 16:379
    DR .3,
    
    I share your thoughts.  I really like your imagery
    of the in-breath and out-breath as well Don.
    
    Nicely said.  Thanks,
    
    Karen
    
62.6Heavenly FatherROMCSA::FIASCHIFri Oct 12 1990 13:1513
    
    I believe that the only prayer Jesus teached us was "Heavenly Father"
    (I do not know English translation).
    
    Personally I was reaised as Catholic and I said this prayer many times:
    it is a beautiful prayer, but do not agree that we have to repeat
    words that the Lord didn't teach us to do.
    
    Love 
    
    Marinella
    
    
62.7I believe...JUPITR::NELSONFri Oct 12 1990 15:2344
    Underlying every religion or denomination there is a creed of core
    beliefs that are the center of that faith. Sometimes creeds are
    expressed in the liturgy and other times it's understood 'tacitly'
    by the community. In fact, every organization, including families, 
    probably has a 'creed' of beliefs and key relationships that one must 
    maintain to be 'in good standing'.
    
    Saying the creed is a witness of our beliefs. When we recite it in
    Church we are re-asserting our belief in these truths. I think anyone
    who actually did NOT believe their creed should either question their
    relationship to that body of believers and/or should be prompted to
    do more study and prayer about their faith.
    
    In this day and age of 'supermarket faith' Creeds probably get under
    the skin of some people who can't 'buy' it all. We, in our arrogance
    (in my opinion) demand that it is the church and creed that must change
    rather than either becoming obedient to the church or leaving it for
    one with a creed we can truely profess.
    
    When we recite the creed we are not only attesting to our own beliefs,
    but also to that of the Church itself. We are once again affirming 
    the foundations of our religion.
    
    As part of the Catholic Mass and also the Rosary, I'm not always 
    'on fire' when reciting this prayer, but it has often caused me to
    reflect on aspects of the creed and to feel the strength of the
    Church down through the ages. I have often paused to reflect on the
    'agelessness' of this prayer and also that many people throughout
    history have died to be able to proclaim it. In this way it takes
    me deeper into my faith.
    
    It is true that Jesus only taught one prayer, the Our Father, but he
    did not say that that was the ONLY prayer to pray. We are told to be
    strong in faith, to meditate on God's law and Word, to pray
    unceasingly, to bring prayers of intercession (etc), and even to 'be 
    still and know I am God'. It seems that the Creed is one that we pray
    to recall the foundation of our Faith - Jesus Christ - and that which
    he instituted to propogate the faith - the Church.
    
    I believe....
    
    Mary
    
    
62.8CSC32::M_VALENZAI noted at Woodstock.Fri Oct 12 1990 15:3613
    The closest thing to a creed in the Religious Society of Friends is the
    belief of "that of God in everyone".  Theological issues regarding
    Christology, the resurrection, virgin birth, etc., are left as
    exercises for the believer.  This has to do, I believe, with defining
    faith not so much in terms subscribing to this or that theological
    doctrine; rather, I see faith more as an issue of practice, commitment,
    and passion.  Different denominations impose doctrinal authority to
    different degrees, and these differences probably suit the different
    needs of various believers.  As for me, I prefer for a religious faith
    to respect my individual searching and self-exploration, and I resist a
    force-fed dogma.

    -- Mike
62.9Science of MindBSS::VANFLEETNoting in tonguesFri Oct 12 1990 15:4724
    To follow Mike's note...the same is pretty much true of Religious
    Science.  Fundamental to the church is that the Divine Presence is
    essentially the fabric of the Universe.  It runs in and through
    everything.  In this sense we are all Sons and Daughters of God.  
    
    The method of prayer, affirmative prayer is also a sort of creed.  This 
    consists of 5 steps:  
    
            1.  Acknowledge or affirm that God is All That Is  
            
            2.  Align yourself with the Divinity within you
            
            3.  Affirm whatever it is that you're praying about in the now
                moment 
    
            4.  Give thanks that Divine will has already accomplished
                whatever you're praying about
    
            5.  Release your words (if you try to hold onto them, you're
                still trying to "do it" for God instead of letting God work 
                within you)
    
    
    Nanci
62.10SA1794::SEABURYMZen: It's not what you thinkWed Oct 17 1990 23:0914
    
       I guess there are creeds and there are creeds... 
      
     Actually I did a fair amount of thinking about this topic and have
    come to about the same conclusion as Mike_V (We gotta find a way
    to keep out Mikes sorted out in this conference)
     They are useful in defining board issues of faith in an inclusive
    rather than an exclusive manner.
      So, I guess I'd say that they are useful in that they can help
    bring people together who otherwise otherwise might be dividing
    up into different groups based on very specific issues.
    
                                                       Mike 
      
62.11CSC32::J_CHRISTIEA Higher CallingThu Oct 18 1990 12:425
    Were not creeds set up originally as a reaction against Gnostic
    teachings?
    
    Peace,
    Richard
62.12SA1794::SEABURYMZen: It's not what you thinkThu Oct 18 1990 16:3015
    Re.11
    
           I don't know, were they ?
    
    
                                                Mike
    
    BTW:  I sorta doubt that the "Triple Treasure", which would
         certainly qualify as a creed for Buddhists was not set
         up as a reaction against gnostic teachings. The same 
         would hold true for the "Profession Of The Faith" for
         a Muslim.
          I guess what I am getting at is Christianity is not alone
         in having creeds.      
    
62.13EDIT::SMITHPassionate committment/reasoned faithThu Oct 18 1990 17:0810
    To me, the creeds we occasionally use in United Methodist churches are
    more a summary of historical belief or a modern rewording of such a
    summary, than they are a statement of my current, literal beliefs.  I
    am thinking particularly of the Apostle's Creed, which I memorized at
    some time in the past.  I do not believe every word in it literally,
    but it links me to the religious understandings of past, as well as
    present, generations, and thus makes me feel connected to a vast
    congregation of believers!
    
    Nancy 
62.14NO CREEDRAVEN1::WATKINSSat Oct 27 1990 23:0513
      The only thing you have to believe to be a member of my church 
    as a "babe in Christ" is the  following:  Do you believe in Jesus
    Christ the Son of God?  Do you believe Jesus Christ died to save you?
    Are you baptized by emersion in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy
    Spirit by an ordained minister of the gospel.
    
    
    The rest of our doctrine you will learn as a member.
    
    
                                 Marshall