| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 1713.1 | Try this | CTHQ3::DEVIVO | Paul DeVivo @TAY 227-3951 | Wed Feb 26 1992 08:29 | 18 |
| 1713.2 | No message with DECwindows Notes | LRCSNL::WALES | David from Down-Under | Wed Feb 26 1992 16:05 | 13 |
| 1713.3 | Accessing INTERNET | SNOC01::VILIUNASS | | Wed Feb 26 1992 17:48 | 19 |
| 1713.4 | Receiving messages from INTERNET | SNOC01::VILIUNASS | | Mon Mar 02 1992 17:15 | 27 |
| 1713.5 | Re: Accessing INTERNET | QUABBI::"[email protected]" | Brian Reid | Tue Mar 03 1992 00:51 | 4 |
| 1713.6 | Re: Accessing INTERNET | QUABBI::"[email protected]" | Brian Reid | Tue Mar 03 1992 01:42 | 18 |
| 1713.7 | Thanks | SNOC01::VILIUNASS | | Tue Mar 03 1992 18:19 | 9 |
| 1713.8 | | NODEX::ADEY | Users? We don't need no stinking users! | Thu Mar 12 1992 09:22 | 9 |
| 1713.9 | Re: Accessing INTERNET | QUABBI::"[email protected]" | Frederick M. Avolio | Thu Mar 12 1992 13:01 | 5 |
| 1713.10 | Re: Accessing INTERNET | QUABBI::"[email protected]" | Brian Reid | Thu Mar 12 1992 13:21 | 17 |
| 1713.11 | Re: Accessing INTERNET | QUABBI::"[email protected]" | Neil Fishman | Thu Mar 12 1992 14:21 | 14 |
| 1713.12 | | NODEX::ADEY | Users? We don't need no stinking users! | Thu Mar 12 1992 14:57 | 16 |
| 1713.13 | Re: Accessing INTERNET | QUABBI::"[email protected]" | Frederick M. Avolio | Thu Mar 12 1992 17:41 | 6 |
| 1713.14 | | MRPTH1::16.34.80.132::slab | [email protected] | Thu May 22 1997 13:29 | 10 |
|
Does a captive VMS account have access to gateways?
IE, if a VMS user can send internal VMSMAIL, can that user also send
outside through a gateway? Or can it be set via a switch?
Also, if the receiving party has a forward set up using a gateway,
and the VMS sending party has no privileges to send through a
gateway, will it fail?
|
| 1713.15 | | HYDRA::SMITH | Tom Smith ZKO1-3/H42 +1 603 881-6329 | Fri May 23 1997 11:22 | 27 |
| If you can send mail to a host, you can relay mail through that host
unless that host refuses to relay.
If you can send mail to MYHOST::me, and you can send mail to
US3RMC::postmaster, you can also send mail to
US3RMC::"[email protected]". It all looks the same to your host.
Whether it gets delivered to "[email protected]" is up to
US3RMC. US3RMC permits relays between arbitrary senders and
recipients, so it will get delivered.
Likewise for smtp%"[email protected]",
smtp%"[email protected]",
smtp%"user%[email protected]", or smtp%"[email protected]".
The gateway relays are part of the internal network, so if you allow
mail to be sent to the internal network, it can be sent to the relays.
You can make smtp%"[email protected]" more difficult by not defining an
"alternate gateway" in UCX, but you can't prevent
smtp%"user%[email protected]" without restricting outgoing mail to
something smaller than "dec.com".
In general, what the recipient has for a forwarding address has no
bearing on what the sender can and cannot do (except possibly to remove
any restrictions you place on the sender).
-Tom
|