Title: | Printing from UNIX |
Moderator: | KERNEL::COFFEYJ |
Created: | Thu Dec 17 1992 |
Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 956 |
Total number of notes: | 2876 |
I hope this is the right place to ask. I have a customer connected a printer to an Alpha with Unix V3.2G. The printcap was defined and can print successfully. She then added a remote print queue on another Alpha with V3.2G. The remote print was successful from that Alpha. Then, she did the same job on a HPUX system so that it can remote print to the Alpha with connected with the print. She failed on this. From Unix, she found that the spool directory contained the print job file but lpc status showed nothing queued. Also no error logged on the error file. I don't know if HPUX is running System V and if this is a possible problem. Someone told me that he remembered there is some kind of naming convention difference in spool directory between System V and BSD. Anyone got idea on this? Regards, Mickwid.
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
937.1 | BSD printer on hpux | EVTAI1::BROCHARD | Manuel Brochard - French CSC | Tue Apr 15 1997 10:36 | 11 |
If I remember, the datafile / control file hasn't the same filename synthax as expected between System V / BSD. ie not "dfA009hostname" and "cfA009hostname" like DU. => I think you can configure it on the hpux, saying it's a BSD printer.. Hope this help, Manuel. | |||||
937.2 | HP differences. | NNTPD::"[email protected]" | Richard Hart | Fri Apr 18 1997 18:11 | 11 |
Yes, HP uses a 4 digit sequence number, so the file names on a HP system would be something like dfA0001hostname, instead of the dfA001hostname on digital UNIX. The use of the 4 digit sequence number is not compliant with the RFC1179 print protocol, so they should have some way to configure the HP system to send print jobs in a way that complies with the standard. I don't have an HP system where I can check this out, so my guesses on exactly what HP does may be a bit incorrect.. Rich. [Posted by WWW Notes gateway] |