| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 10.1 | lpsched print scheduler is not running | KERNEL::CARPENTERS | One inode short of a file system | Thu Dec 17 1992 14:16 | 43 |
| 10.2 | Printer does not print | KERNEL::CARPENTERS | One inode short of a file system | Thu Dec 17 1992 14:22 | 114 |
| 10.3 | Cannot direct output to printer | KERNEL::CARPENTERS | One inode short of a file system | Thu Dec 17 1992 14:56 | 44 |
| 10.4 | Port does not respond | KERNEL::CARPENTERS | One inode short of a file system | Thu Dec 17 1992 15:00 | 19 |
| 10.5 | Printer output is illegible | KERNEL::CARPENTERS | One inode short of a file system | Thu Dec 17 1992 15:02 | 71 |
| 10.6 | Printer output spacing is wrong | KERNEL::CARPENTERS | One inode short of a file system | Thu Dec 17 1992 15:03 | 18 |
| 10.7 | parrell printer is slow | KERNEL::CARPENTERS | One inode short of a file system | Thu Dec 17 1992 15:11 | 99 |
| 10.8 | Still applicable? | BOOKIE::PANGAKIS | Tara DTN 381-2433 | Mon Feb 03 1997 12:53 | 2 |
| As mentioned in 8.5, I'm trying to determine if these are still
accurate?
|
| 10.9 | | KERNEL::COFFEYJ | La Feline Flooz - a unix cat | Mon Feb 03 1997 16:53 | 16 |
|
They're accurate for SCO these ones.
They're their articles I beleive, dunno where you'd be legal if you reproduce them
for anything other than digital support engineers, I'd check with someone like the
poster of the notes since we might be obliged to not pass them to anyone who
doesn't have a contract.
They won't be relevant to anything other than SCO I'd guess since it's a different
printer system to Ultrix or OSF/1. As for current SCO print problems - you'll be
lucky if you can find anyone who knows of it as we don't support it here any more
- don't know if maybe someone over in Appledorn (SP?) in Holland might remember.
Then again as digital no longer supports SCO s/w it's unlikely you'll need to
worry about these too much
|