| Title: | CISCO |
| Notice: | <<< The Menlo Park Routers >>> |
| Moderator: | KERNEL::SYSTEM |
| Created: | Wed May 26 1993 |
| Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 515 |
| Total number of notes: | 1440 |
Has anbody configered a network where CLNS and ISO IGRP is used! Since our customer has an Int. IS-IS backbone we also want to do some kind of redistribution between these two routing protocols (if this is possible/makes sense). Regards Hans-Peter Durand
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 512.1 | Why not I-ISIS on cisco's? | STKHLM::WEBJORN | Gullik Webj�rn Network Advisory | Tue May 27 1997 11:54 | 13 |
I think you might find a few problems since "quote"ISO?? IGRP"unquote"
will not handle anything byt pure CLNS if this is a traditional
mixed DEC / DECNET / OSI / PHASE IV environment.
Why don't you run I-ISIS on the ciscos? ( I presume they are cisco's)
It works and is not too complicated to get working including all
multiprotocol stuff.
Just my 2 c worth.
Gullik
| |||||
| 512.2 | ISO IGRP -- No DECnet/OSI | GENIE::DURAND | Tue May 27 1997 14:08 | 17 | |
> I think you might find a few problems since "quote"ISO?? IGRP"unquote" > will not handle anything byt pure CLNS if this is a traditional > mixed DEC / DECNET / OSI / PHASE IV environment. Oops, good to know that ISO IGRP works only for pure CLNS. > > Why don't you run I-ISIS on the ciscos? ( I presume they are cisco's) > It works and is not too complicated to get working including all > multiprotocol stuff. Yes the test environment runs already with Int. IS-IS. But the customer has a lot of ol' AGS+ boxen around, where Int IS-IS doesn't run. And he doesn't like to pay for the upgrade... Hans-Peter Durand | |||||