T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1793.1 | | TOLKIN::HOGAN | | Wed Oct 13 1993 17:29 | 9 |
|
The theroy is the longer the club the more club head speed and the
more distance. More important of course is feel and accuracy. If
the set you have are longer than standard nad you are of average
height they are to long. Knocking a half inch off them will not make
a huge difference. You will loose some swingweight but swingweight is
highly overrated. anything from c8 to d3 is fine for the average
player. One swingweight is about the weight of a dollar bill so take it
from there.
|
1793.2 | Longer shaft = Greater distance | POBOX::SARRAZINE | | Wed Oct 13 1993 18:39 | 26 |
|
Both swing weight and shaft length factor greatly into the distance
formula. Look at the equipment being used in long drive competitions
and you will get an idea of what elements are important in hitting the
golf ball far.
Swing weight has little to do with actual club weight. If you take a
club shaft and put a 10 pound plug in one end and hold that end of the
shaft in your hands, the club will feel light. If you hold the club
with the weight on the other end, the club will seem much heavier. If
you try to swing this club both ways you will see that you have more
control of the weight when it is closest to your hands.
Shaft length is directly related to club head speed and thus distance.
If you took a 2 iron and 3 iron with the same shaft length, which would
hit the ball farther? Answer is the 3 iron because both hit the ball
below the optimum 45 degree angle but the 3 iron is closer and would
therefor carry the ball farther. The longer the club shaft the farther
the clubhead travels before impact generating more clubhead speed.
If you are new to golf, I would not start modifying your clubs. If
the longer clubs are unwieldy, shorten your swing to gain control and
gradually lengthen your swing maintaining control until you attain the
results you are looking for.
_Greg
|
1793.3 | control not length...!!! | TRLIAN::GORDON | | Thu Oct 14 1993 09:25 | 12 |
| if all that was needed for more clubhead speed was longer shafts
don't you think we'd see some l...o...n...g.... clubs by all the
golf equipment people?
More important is "control"....
whatever you use you must be able to control it....
ever try hitting a 45" driver? try you'll then understand why
control is the most important aspect of the swing...
|
1793.4 | 45� angle rathole | NOVA::FINNERTY | Sell high, buy low | Thu Oct 14 1993 10:37 | 19 |
|
re .1: optimum 45� angle
in school we learned about parabolic trajectories and why 45�
gives the longest carry; but this is only an approximation
due to the effects of air friction.
the trajectory of the ball (see the Top-Flite ads) seems to
look more like a Poisson distribution turned backwards, i.e.
it drops more sharply at the end than a concave-down parabolic
curve.
i've wondered to myself whether it is as non-parabolic as the
Top-Flite ads would have us believe, so I just watched some
balls hit on the driving range (from the side) one day. The
trajectory is definately not parabolic.
ergo 45� is not the angle that maximizes distance.
|
1793.5 | | MSBCS::VARLEY | | Thu Oct 14 1993 12:27 | 7 |
| I was standing by a green at this year's US Open at Baltusrol, watching
guys hit 80-120 yard shots in. It was amazing. As the balls reached the
front of the green, they looked like they were a mile in the air - then
suddenly they'd drop seemingly straight down. You could almost hear the
spin...
__Jack
|
1793.6 | And Further... | SWAM2::WANTJE_RA | | Thu Oct 14 1993 16:08 | 20 |
| Thank you for the replies. Very interesting subject.
I notice that I do have MUCH better control with a 3/4 swing with all
my clubs. One interesting point is, I do not seem to gain much (if any)
distance with the longer irons/woods. With my irons I top out at about
150(?) yards with 7/6 irons and only my 5 wood gives anything much
further. I am consistantly 10/12 yards different with each iron
between SW & 7 and then that is it.
I am trying to replicate the same feeling in the swing that I have with
my shorters (most of the time). Hard to describe the feeling but much
like swinging a stone at the end of a 3/4 foot piece of string. When
that happens, I do not have look, guess, or hope - I know it went as
right as rain. What a feeling!
Of course that only happens on the range when I am by myself! ;-)
re .1 Pardon but I do not understand 'c8 to d3'.
Ralph
|
1793.7 | swingweight 101 | ASDG::TREMBLAY | | Tue Oct 19 1993 14:48 | 9 |
| Swingweight is measured on a scale (a balance) with the fulcrum
14" from the butt of the club. The scale starts at 'A' for the
lightest and proceeds through the alphabet. Each letter is divided
into 10 increments. After C9 comes D0 (zero) etc. Most clubs are in
the range Pete mentioned. It has nothing to do with the total weight
of the club, just the distribution of the weight. The higher the
swingweight, the heavier the club will 'feel' because the weight is
distributed more toward the club head.
JT
|
1793.8 | | PCASTN::CARRELL | | Mon Nov 01 1993 16:10 | 17 |
| One possibility that hasn't been mentioned is that your clubs
aren't "matched". When I started golfing, I was given a old
starter set. I hacked around with that set until I was under 100
consistently. I never could hit the driver or 3 iron. It was
always a slice. Even the 5 iron gave me occasional trouble. When
I decided to get "real" clubs, I took them to Nevada Bob's in
order to say, I want my new clubs to feel like this 3 wood. I
found out that each club had a different swing weight which
increased with the club length. What a relief! I did have a
farily consistent swing through the clubs. The long ones were
just too heavy and I couldn't get them around.
If your clubs are fairly new, this probably isn't the problem.
And it is just early swing mechanics that need practice and
instruction
WCIII
|