T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1300.1 | playing wentworth... | TRLIAN::GORDON | | Mon Jul 08 1991 15:13 | 17 |
| as I recall...having not played it for three years...he goes...
- not exceptionally long
- plenty of blind shots
- very tight on some holes...(2-6/7)
- over a creek on around the 7th hole and
two/three holes play there then back over
the creek again(par 4 going over, then par 4, then par 3 comming
back)
- pretty course at least the bay area holes...
-fun to play...
|
1300.2 | Expensive but... | VICKI::MANSOR | | Tue Jul 09 1991 14:14 | 12 |
| Haven't played it in 2 years, but it's a treat to play. I would agree
with all of .1's assessments, only to add that it's usually in great
shape. The greens have always been in perfect condition, the fairways
plush.
Their signature hole is the par-5 8th that reminds you of Pebble
Beach's finishing hole, except the ocean's on the right. You tee off
out on a tip of land and cut off as much of the fairway as you want to
risk without leaving it on the beach. Exciting hole.
Bring enough cash. Last time I checked it was $40/round and $11 for a
cart (optional).
Art
|
1300.3 | My Two Cents | ASABET::VARLEY | | Wed Jul 10 1991 10:30 | 3 |
| Waste of time, except for the few holes on the water.
--Jack
|
1300.4 | waste of time????? | TRLIAN::GORDON | | Wed Jul 10 1991 11:07 | 11 |
| re: .3
Come on Jack...this is one of the courses used in the rotation
for the "Seacoast Amateur" golf tourney which is run every year in
the seacoast. The tourney is a quality tournament have players from
area clubs only and includes players that are/have been state AM title
holders....now if this course was that bad I'm sure it would have been
removed from the list a long time ago....
Many don't like it because of the "short length and blind holes"
but it doesn't always take length to find a tough golf course...
|
1300.5 | "Sorry, Mr. Ouimet..." | ASABET::VARLEY | | Fri Jul 12 1991 11:47 | 15 |
| I just didn't like all the "Goofy" holes. As far as the Seacoast
Amateur goes, I intend no disrespect to the players, BUT -
1. There are no great courses in N.H., and almost no good ones (Sky
Meadow, Nashua C.C., Manchester and perhaps Shattuck Inn). The amateurs
have to play what is available.
2. Some of the good courses may not want the tournament. BTW, I left
off Portsmouth, which I hear is "Good."
I'm not trying to be a hard ass, but when I think about taking a day
to play someplace "Special," it sure isn't Wentworth. There are too
many other good courses around that you can get on - especially for
$40.
Jack (Who had to pass on a chance to play The Country Club - Brookline
- today because of work. I'm SICK !!!)
|
1300.6 | | KOALA::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Fri Jul 12 1991 12:10 | 4 |
| >> Jack (Who had to pass on a chance to play The Country Club - Brookline
>> - today because of work. I'm SICK !!!)
If you're that sick then you shouldn't be at work. 8*) 8*)
|
1300.7 | frame of reference | NHASAD::BLAISDELL | Keep an even keel | Fri Jul 12 1991 12:30 | 8 |
|
For those that have read about Mr. Varley's travels in this
conference, you have to understand his point of reference. He has
played almost all the truly great courses in this country(world). So
what he considers great/good courses in New England, may be totally out
of whack as to what you and me might consider great/good courses.
-rick
|
1300.8 | Wilderness? | WMOIS::REEVE_C | | Fri Jul 12 1991 12:59 | 4 |
| Jack- re N.H. courses- have you played the Balsams? I've heard good
things about it but haven't been up there yet.
Chris
|
1300.9 | | NEWPRT::JOHNSON_DO | | Fri Jul 12 1991 14:42 | 6 |
| While not an expert, I do see great potential in Passaconaway. The
back nine "devil's triangle" can cause problems. I also think that
Overlook has potential.
SCD
|
1300.10 | | KOALA::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Fri Jul 12 1991 15:27 | 5 |
|
I'd love to see Passaconaway in about 20-30 years when the trees have
grown. It could be a real classic.
Mike
|
1300.11 | Nice condition, not enough room | CHRLIE::HUSTON | | Fri Jul 12 1991 17:59 | 11 |
|
I don't think Pasaconoway will ever be considered a nice course, sure
it is usually in good shape, has decent length etc. But the fact is,
there just isn't enough room there for 18 holes. The holes are to close
together and it is dangerous, and always will be. When you have
adjacent holes and the fairways are only about 30-40 feet apart, well
it ain't never gonna be a good test of golf. I predict when the state
AM is there in a couple years that they eat the place for lunch.
--Bob
|
1300.12 | | NEWPRT::JOHNSON_DO | | Fri Jul 12 1991 19:09 | 15 |
| Could be right, but when the wind kicks up, and some of those trees get
tall enough, you have got problem unless you can hit it straight.
Besides, if the only rating for a nice course is one the States best
amateurs can bring down, then there aren't many great courses.
To me, a great course is one that shows variety, length, requies
some(moderate accuracy) and allows for a variety of styles of golfers
to succeed. If long and straight is all that can win on a course, then
it is a tough course, but not a great course. The pros hate PGA West
because it does not reward all types of golfers, and it will probably
never be regarded as a great course...unique, tough, challenging,
unfair but not great.
SCD
|
1300.13 | It will never be a GOOD course | CHRLIE::HUSTON | | Mon Jul 15 1991 08:41 | 27 |
|
I agree that the trees would cause a problem, but there just aren't
that many trees, there isn't room for them. There are trees planted
and where they are planted will be effective. The problem is there
just isn't enough room on most holes to even put trees.
I did not mean that since the best state AM players will shoot good
scores on it that it is not a good course. The reason I think the
people will shoot good scores is that you can basically hit your
tee shot ANYWHERE of most tees, even from the blues, and you still
don't incur any real penalty, no punch out of the woods, lost ball
etc. Sure there are a couple of holes where you may go OB, but this
usually takes a really horrible shot (1 or 2 exceptions), length
is not a factor on the back side at all so missing the fairway
by 50 yards is no real penalty, so you hit a mid to short iron instead
of a half wedge to the green. The front, which is much longer than
the back (especially from the blues), there is really only 1 hole
that distance is a problem if you miss the fairway.
I just don't think Pasaconoway has the makings of a good course.
THe holes lack definition (ok trees MAY help here), and there just
is not enough room, this takes the trouble away for a stray shot,
instead of being in the woods/rough you simply are in another
holes fairway.
--Bob
|
1300.14 | Maybe (?) This Will Help... | ASABET::VARLEY | | Mon Jul 15 1991 17:32 | 38 |
| The R.T. Jones boys tell me that "Routing" a course is the toughest
thing to do. Sounds like Passaconaway has that problem.
Chris, I've heard that The Balsams is pretty good but condition was
(In the past) somewhat uneven. Perhaps money problems.
I really didn't want to offend anyone about Wentworth, but as I think
I said, a course is either worth a day off, or it isn't - especially
with all the good ones around. For example, if you want to see what a
"Kind of" links course looks like, play New Seabury Blue. You generally
have to do it in Spring or Fall, but it's a good test. I guess that at
the time I played Wentworth I was expecting something great - Donald
Ross, etc. Instead, I found a course he must have "Phoned in."
I've been pretty lucky to play the places I have, but I don't really
try to compare 'em to normal courses. For example, I wouldn't look at
Sky Meadow and say, "It's not as good as Shinnecock or Congressional,
so it's no good. I like Sky Meadow. What I do is read a lot, listen to
the Jones boys, try to be observant when I "Play" a great course and
apply what seems to make a course great to a "Normal" course. Some
normal courses are surprisingly good, or at least have some redeeming
qualities. For example, I always liked Far Corners and Crystal Springs.
Unpretentious, but real good. I loved Whitinsville, and it's a 9 holer.
Fortunately, you don't have to be a good golfer to appreciate great
courses, and I'm sure proof of that. Most of the time when a golfer
visits a "Shrine," he/she become overcome by the course condition, the
facilities, etc. To me, that stuff is usually a "Given." They're all
nice. But when you think about the course, you see what really makes it
great - little subtleties. So, the next time you hear somebody in a bar
say "Ah, I play Stow North from the tips, I hit it BIG, I bet I'd be
just as good at Baltusrol or Kittansett or Muirfield Village," think
about how much fun it would be to watch this guy actually play there.
There sure IS a difference. You know, as I get older, and my game goes
South, I think half the fun is actually getting on these places. It's
like a game in itself...
--Jack
|
1300.15 | PAN N.H., Will you? | SONATA::FEENEY | non golfers live half a life | Tue Jul 16 1991 16:05 | 12 |
| Jack, I have to disagree with you when you pan the courses in N. H.
There are many good public and private courses - sky meadow, Eastmann
Country Club of N.H., Shatuck Inn, Brentwood, Keene Country club etc..
Maybe you have a different perspective but my view is that anyone who
fails to play some of these courses has missed a real experience
especially in the fall.
I have played many courses all over the world, no comparison to your
experience, but believe N.H. golfing to be the greatest. So Jack take
back your pan of N.H., OK?
Phil
|
1300.16 | "You're (Kinda) Right..." | ASABET::VARLEY | | Wed Jul 17 1991 11:39 | 10 |
| A lot of those courses are nice, and you're right - especially in the
Fall. I still dislike Wentworth, though. I don't think any of 'em are
GREAT, with tremendous character, but they ARE worth playing. Maybe I'm
just a little "Grumped out" because after my golf trip I stopped
playing for 2 weeks, bought a new set of Edge GS's and went to the
range and hit grounders. On Sunday I have to take my "Grounders" to
Crumpin-Fox, and on 7/26 they travel (Hopefully) to the Lakeside course
of Olympic in San Francisco.. Ouch !!
--Jack
|
1300.17 | | NEWPRT::JOHNSON_DO | | Thu Jul 18 1991 15:58 | 14 |
| EXCUUUUSE US!!!
If you are playing the Olympic then there is no comparison. How do you
kepp em down on the farm after they've seen Paris?? I of course would
not attempt to compare golf courses liek Passa... with ones like you
are playing. But I think the only bad courses are those that charge
big bucks and are not in great shape...other than that, every course
has its place and purpose in the market. I play some beat up courses,
that don't charge a lot, and work on parts of my game. I play great
courses and just enjoy being there. Have a great time in Bagdad by the
Bay. Maybe One-ton can meet you at Olympic and clean your clubs.
SoCalDandy
|
1300.18 | 1 GREENS FEE NO CART PLEASE | ODIXIE::SIVRET | | Mon Jul 22 1991 16:23 | 8 |
| I too don't agree with knock on Wentworth or NH golf in general. After
relocating to Florida from NH about 1 1/2 years ago. I have had the
chance to play some of our finest courses (Grand Cypress, Lake Nona,
Innisbrook, Doral, Greenleaf West, Amelia Island and Sawgrass. I would
still love to have a nice fall day on any number of NH courses without
a single golf cart in site. Yes all the above World Class courses
require you to take a cart with the exception of Grand Cypress (The New
Course) OBTW you still have to pay for the cart.
|
1300.19 | Everything's Easy... | ASABET::VARLEY | | Mon Jul 29 1991 12:10 | 9 |
| You get what you pay for. It all depends on what you want. If you just
want to "Whack whitey" someplace, and not spend a lot of bucks - fine
with me. I belong to an inexpensive place myself (Crumpin-Fox), and
there are cheaper places around that are o.k. too. I like Fall golf in
New England also. Everybody's right here - but I will NOT play
Wentworth again. BTW, Olympic "Lakeside" has some of the strongest par
4's I have EVER seen...
--Jack
|
1300.20 | A Different Wentworth | MORO::WHICKER_BI | Scrooge McDuck Had It All! | Thu Oct 17 1991 20:16 | 21 |
| Jack,
When I was a kid growing up in Portsmouth, the Wentworth course was
only nine holes, and was considered pretty easy by the 'locals' who
preferred the Portsmouth CC or the Sagamore. The Wentworth expanded to
18 holes, and changed the layouts from when I played as a kid. I
hadn't been back to that course for about 25 years, but I played it a
couple of times this summer. Compared to a lot of southern California
courses, the Wentworth was HEAVEN! Real trees, real rocks and
boulders, hills for godsake, ocean views! Yes, it was a bit pricey,
but the conditions were excellent, and there was NO SLOW PLAY!
By the way, have you ever played the Sagamore course in North Hampton,
NH? Its one of the prettiest courses I've ever seen. Its only medium
hard and probably won't go down in the books as a GREAT course, but its
beautiful and challenging all the same. After all, golf course
greatness, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder...
Regards,
Bill
|
1300.21 | | MRKTNG::VARLEY | | Fri Oct 18 1991 10:26 | 11 |
| No, I haven't played Sagamore yet, but I sure agree about golf course
greatness being in the eye of the beholder. What used to appeal to me
when I was a kid (9 miles long, hit driver as hard as you can), seems
one dimensional now. Everyone has a preference, and they're all
correct. If someone describes a course to me that doesn't sound like
what I like, I just skip it. In doing that, I'm sure I've missed some
nice places.
I've heard good things about Portsmouth and Cocheco, too.
--Jack
|