T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
903.1 | ROBERT GAMEZ THE NEXT MERRY-MEX | WFOV11::GUGLIELMO_T | | Mon Mar 26 1990 09:05 | 6 |
| Unbeilevable(sp)!!! My Fiance thught I was having a heart attack.
I don't think that one can be topped all year.I like this kid too
he's 21 and can only get better.He seems to stay within himself
he is no head case he may be the next great player.
Ted
|
903.2 | 5 or 7 iron...? | MSEE::KELLEY | Golfaholic - Clubmaker | Mon Mar 26 1990 09:17 | 7 |
|
Can somebody that was able to watch the tourney post what club he
actually used for the shot? ESPN said a 7 iron and the Boston Globe
says it was a 5 iron...!
Thanks
Gene
|
903.3 | From the horse's mouth..
| LEDS::OBRIENR | | Mon Mar 26 1990 09:27 | 11 |
|
re .-1
During the interview after the tournament, Gamez said that he had a
6-iron in his hand, but opted for the 7-iron because he was so
pumped up.
Poor Greg, he must have been REALLY bad in a former life ;}
How many times can one guy be beaten by lucky shots?
Ron
|
903.4 | Helluva shot! | PNO::LATHAM | | Mon Mar 26 1990 09:30 | 8 |
| CNN said on the news this A.M. that it was a 5-iron.
That's what I would have hit and I can't come close to hitting them
as far as the pro's.
Although when you consider that the shot had to carry to the green
with no room for screwing up Gamez probably was playing smart and
making sure he had enough stick.
Harold
|
903.5 | | WORDS::NISKALA | Waiting for the golf season | Mon Mar 26 1990 09:46 | 1 |
| UST Today says it was a 7-iron.
|
903.6 | Great Shot | RVAX::ERICKSON | What? Me Worry! | Mon Mar 26 1990 10:31 | 16 |
|
Great shot by Gamaz. I watched it, and the annouces origianlly
said a 5 iron, then they said a 7 iron. I'd have to say it was a
7 iron. Unbelievable though, he does have great composure. Looks
like is 11 on 17 last week didn't stick in his mind. As for Norman's
2nd shot on 18. I would have thought he would have been closer than
20 feet away for his birdie attempt. Gumbel was interviewing Gamaz
as they were waiting for Norman to play 18. The asked him the question
of whether or not winning his first tournament hurt him or not.
He said it helped him a lot because now he doesn't have to go to
the tournament school for a few years to re-qualify. He said he
hated qualfying school. Also they showed his reaction when Norman
missed his putt on 18. He acted like a real pro, didn't really
smile just let out a little sigh of relief.
/Ron
|
903.7 | Entertaining shot maybe but.... | KAOFS::C_HENRY | | Mon Mar 26 1990 10:53 | 24 |
| It was definately a 7 iron.....
I think now though i will whine about this one a liitle...As much as
Gamez is a hell of a prospect and has already proved himself to be of
PGA caliber, i have to feel for Norman...these little barf bags keep
coming out right at the end of the tourneys and taking away victories,
which appear to belong to Norman, with lucky shots. Irregardless of how
nice they look, that is all they are!
To be sure i will get some complaints about this reply, but it seems to
me that guys have not payed enough dues to be pulling off this garbage.
Okay so it's the nature of the game but I'm still....
.... mad as hell in Canada
great white north golf fanatic
|
903.8 | | ASABET::J_REID | | Mon Mar 26 1990 10:58 | 8 |
|
Norman had the chances on the last two holes to tie, he hit a good putt
on 17, but 18 Never had a chance. What Gamez did was great, but Norman
still had his chance...
Jim
|
903.9 | Oh to hit one that far just one. | WFOV12::GUGLIELMO_T | | Mon Mar 26 1990 11:20 | 6 |
| Gamez said right on the air in the interview with Gumbel that it
was a seven iron.That is one hell of a seven iron,BUT think about
this his drive was exactly the same as Normans 305 YARDS.now that
is laying into them.
Ted
|
903.10 | Brian Gumbel ..replaced.. | USEM::VOUTSELAS | | Mon Mar 26 1990 11:33 | 12 |
| "the Miller man ......again..
Just before Gamez hit, Milller says" this kid puts more spin on
the ball than anybody" and it sort of side-saddled spun in!!
You could tell from the trajectory it was no 5 iron.
In the air I said"that's a six or hard 7".
Plus he played the ball back in the stance and took big divot,
not usual for a 5 iron.Maybe I can take Gumbel's place!!
Nice kid....
Ang
|
903.11 | Now go for a Major! | DUGGAN::DIAZ | TAVO, THE LATIN PUTTER | Mon Mar 26 1990 11:45 | 10 |
| I also read the article in GD last night, and after he won yesterday
I was laughing at the timing of it. But I am sure that they will
still say he needs to prove himself more, so he would have to have a
great finish (maybe not win but be in contention and not to choke) in
a Major (Maybe at the Masters?) and then he will prove once and for
all that he has definitely star quality.
Go for it Gamez!!
Tavo
|
903.12 | Winning=Hard Work not Miracles | FINALY::SCHNEIHC | Hal Schneider-Something's Fishy | Mon Mar 26 1990 12:27 | 16 |
| re: a few back
Come on now, let's give the kid credit. Maybe he was lucky to sink a 7
iron for an eagle, but if he weren't in the hunt, it wouldn't have
won him the tournament. Norman had two opportunities to tie him to get
into a play-off and blew both of them, so I have a little trouble
feeling sorry for him. If he learned how to play better on Thursday,
Friday and Saturday he wouldn't have to worry about miracle shots
robbing him of a tournament by one shot. AND, how many "great" shots
did Norman make that we didn't see that got him that close.
Personally, I don't call them miracle shots. When you're as good as
these guys, and consistently get the ball close to the hole on your
approach shots, one of them is bound to go in once in awhile. Gamez's
timing just happened to be right!
Hal
|
903.13 | Of Course It's Luck, So ? | SKETCH::PIEL | | Mon Mar 26 1990 13:14 | 25 |
| Gamez's shot on 18 was very exciting ! Was it lucky, sure it was.
There is always an element of luck in this game. But it did not detract
from his win.
I am a Greg Norman fan and was sadden to see him beaten again by a
lucky shot. As another note rightly pointed out, Greg did have his
chances. The 17th comes to mind. Yet, I do feel he is somewhat snake-
bitten. A thought comes to mind, however, and it is while Norman does
have trouble winning, he is playing well enough to be near the lead
when these shots happen. That speaks well of his ability. Also, from
a public point of view Greg never seems to be a whinner over it. One must
credit him for his professionalism, sportsmanship or whatever you want
to call it.
Robert Gamez is having a great year and is giving the PGA quite a
thrill. I hope he keeps it up. Not mentioned yet is the fact that his
eagle on 18 was he second of the day. He had one on the back nine, too.
Could he be the next superstar that everybody is looking for ? Only
time will tell. But for now, I have enjoyed what he has given the fans
and look forward to more.
Ken
|
903.14 | No tears for The Shark | FOOZLE::STANZ | | Mon Mar 26 1990 13:15 | 15 |
| Shed no tears for the Shark- as I was watching, I commented that his
shots into the greens were average at best. He was leaving himself 20
to 30 footers fro his birdies. He never gave himself a chance. One
hole,
I can't remeber which, I said- he's got to go for the stick....he
landed 30 feet away, and Curtis put it within 10 feet. It just seemed
that he could not find the pin, and was going for the heart of the
green instead.
Take nothing away from Gamez's shot- it was one of the more spectacular
ones you'll see. Norman just didn't have it. BTW, I really love Norman
and the way he plays. Even though he was not at his best, he still
could have won it- everyone else was backing up.....
As I said- no tears for Greg, and big cheers for Robert Gamez!
|
903.15 | "Star" NE "Great" | HKFINN::F_MCGOWAN | Zoot who? | Mon Mar 26 1990 13:43 | 24 |
| Re the last few...I'm another fan of Greg Norman, and rooted for
him down the stretch, while recognizing he wasn't playing great
golf (leaving those long putts, missing greens, etc.); but I said
to my wife as Gamez was preparing for his second shot on 18 that
if anyone but Norman was to win the tournament, I'd like it to be
Gamez - then, *pow* that amazing eagle!
He does seem to have the knack of bringing out the "career" shots
in his competitors...maybe this will be the year when he'll *not*
lose a major when someone double-eagles a hole in a playoff (but
I wouldn't bet against it happening). The Masters comes up weekend
after next...there are a lot of guys with something to prove.
Frank
P.S. As to Norman having "star" quality - there's no doubt about it,
if you define it as the quality of making lots of people want to
see you perform. He attracts large galleries, as Arnold did/does,
and as Chi Chi does. But I'd agree that he's still to prove himself
as belonging in the first rank of "great" golfers. Still, like Seve,
he's one of those guys who're among the favorites in any tournament,
and is certainly not one of the so-called "faceless" crop of new
guys on the Tour.
|
903.16 | Great win for Gamez, good 2nd for Norman | SA1794::WELLSPEAK | Waiting for you to come along | Mon Mar 26 1990 13:59 | 19 |
| I too like Norman and his style of play. Yea, I feel a little
sorry for him considering the way he's lost about 4 tournaments
over here. But 2nd place is not so bad!!! He made something like
$92,000 for his 2nd place finish, and played pretty well too. Granted,
he could have made a couple of better shots during the last 2 holes,
but, he did finish 2nd out of a field of how many? He's got my
vote as the favorite for the Masters.
About Gamez, great shot, great golf, and all the congrats in
the world. It has to be tough for a young kid, his 1st year on
tour and all, to deal with the pressure. Everyone gets lucky once
in awhile with this game. His just came at the most ideal moment.
And I'm sure Greg Norman will tell you he's had plenty of shots
role into the hole, that were totally unexpected.
I didn't see the round, off cottage hunting for vacation, but
am sure Norman didn't come out afterwards and say, "He's lucky and
never could do that again!!!", something to the effect that Mark
Calcaveccia said about Normans chip in to win against him.
Beak
|
903.17 | | FSHQA1::JGALLAGHER | | Mon Mar 26 1990 14:05 | 9 |
| What do these guys eat for breakfast??
Not only was Gamez's 7 iron absolutely amazing, but as Norman was
coming down the stretch, he pushed one of his drives off into the
gallery. He had something like 205 to the green, fairly open with
a huge pine right in the way. He pulled out a 5 iron, flew over
the tree and right into the heart of the green!
Jim G.
|
903.18 | talk about emotion swings | PARITY::RANDERSON | | Mon Mar 26 1990 14:32 | 11 |
| Don't forget how Larry Mize must have felt. After all, he went from
being the leader (or co-leader, Norman had just made a birdie to tie I
think) to having to hole a shot from the sand just to tie Gamez. Had
he not been forced to attack the hole he may have also finished -13 and
would have had to go into a playoff with Norman. I just don't think
Norman was as "snake-bit" on this one as in the other "fluke" losses.
Gamez' finish definitely ranked right up there with the incredible last
second NCAA basketball finishes this past week in terms of excitement.
Ron
|
903.19 | Has Norman learned to be cautious? | HKFINN::F_MCGOWAN | Zoot who? | Tue Mar 27 1990 13:41 | 22 |
| Implied in earlier replies was the notion that Norman was not at
his aggressive best, and was taking the safe shots rather than the
high-risk, high-payoff/high-penalty shots. I can't read minds, but
it would certainly be uncharacteristic of him to play conservative,
"settle for 2nd-place money" golf. Well, maybe. Maybe he's starting
to listen to Jack Nicklaus, instead of his own instincts; but if
he has, golf's lost one of its most charismatic individuals. Sure,
there are times when aggressiveness gives way to recklessness, like
his tee shot on 18 at the British Open (or Arnold's attempt to break
Hogan's scoring record at the 1966 (?) US Open, which allowed Billy
Casper to catch and beat him). But my opinion is that he just wasn't
hitting the ball where he meant it to go, and wound up with 20+
foot putts. I think he only cared about winning, not ensuring that
he got at least runner-up money (else why knock the birdie putt
so far past the hole on 18, leaving a treacherous come-backer; why
not just lag it up a couple of feet short, tap it in and pick up
the check?).
Can't wait for the Masters!
Frank
|
903.20 | no timid shark here | WFOV11::GUGLIELMO_T | | Tue Mar 27 1990 14:47 | 11 |
| Wait a minute the man hit a 5 iron 204 yards out of the rough over a
100 foot pine tree within 10 feet of the hole.
Then on the last hole he hit a 305 yard drive.
That sounds like gregg to me.
By the way on the 5 iron shot Mark Rolfing sayed that he came up
on his toes he swung so hard
TEd
|
903.21 | Those distances aren't that unexpected | SA1794::WELLSPEAK | Waiting for you to come along | Tue Mar 27 1990 15:58 | 21 |
| A lot of things affect the distance of a shot. Wind direction,
being in the rough, which can cause a flier, the adrenalen a player
has when in the hunt for a championship during the last 9 holes,
even elevation(the heavyness of the air) can affect the normal distance
a shot will travel. I average about 155 yards for a 7 iron. Which
means I certainly could hit the club 165 yards on a hard swing with
very solid contact. Why do noters think a strong young pro with
a good swing, pumped full of adrenalin, couldn't hit it 175 yards?
Not to mention, many have said it was over water. Well, the 175
yards, or in Normans case, 205 yards, was measured to the pin, not
the green. To the front of the green could have been as much as
a 30 yard difference. That can be a 2 to 3 club difference in a
pros game. I'm sure Norman could hit a 5 iron over 210 yards on
a given swing. Hell, in that tournament thats played somewhere
in Colardo, the one that uses a stableford system, I remeber Jack
Nicklaus hitting a 4 iron from 245 yards away. He made the green
in tha air. The fact is, the pros know their games and their
capabilities and limitations. They adjust their club selection
to the situation at hand and the conditions at that time.
Beak
|
903.22 | | SIOG::OGRADY | | Wed Mar 28 1990 04:43 | 8 |
| I think it was last years Doral, but Bill Glasson was hitting his
7-iron 200 yards (!).
I also remember reading that Greg Norman hit a 5 iron ( wind assisted
and in a friendly game ) 400 yards ( yes, 400! ).
I think most professional golfers , no matter how aggressive they
look normally, only hit the ball at 85-90% strength.
martin o'
|
903.23 | | CAM::ZIOMEK | Pump up the TEST | Wed Mar 28 1990 11:57 | 7 |
|
.21
Well said!
John-
|
903.24 | Norman's post-Nestles comments | DICKNS::F_MCGOWAN | Zoot who? | Sat Mar 31 1990 08:56 | 14 |
| Re. 16 - Correct...Greg had no demeaning comments to make about
Gamez's miracle shot (more like an albatross than an eagle, really,
though that's how it goes on the card); in the article in Golf World
(a greatly improved magazine since being taken over by Golf Digest),
he's quoted as saying "Sure, I'm disappointed I didn't win. But
I'm happy for the guy who holed his shot...I haven't seen him [Gamez]
play, but I guess he can play if he can hole a shot on the last
hole." Incidentally (maybe this belongs in the note about "player
of the 90's") Paul Azinger was quoted as saying (about Gamez), "You
looking for another superstar? You got one right there."
Frank
|