[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::golf

Title:Welcome to the Golf Notes Conference!
Notice:FOR SALE notes in Note 69 please! Intros in note 863 or 61.
Moderator:FUNYET::ANDERSON
Created:Tue Feb 15 1994
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2129
Total number of notes:21499

837.0. "WILSON ULTRA clubs???" by CLEVER::ROBERTSON () Fri Dec 29 1989 10:07

    Have you seen the adds for the new Wilson Ultras clubs?? Some guy
    in an airplane blabbing about how great his game was....
    
        They're based on the fact that you swing at a 45 degree angle and
    not a 90 degree angle, which is the principal most clubs are
    supposively designed around. ???

    Anyway, does anyone know anything about these clubs?? 
    
    Thanks.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
837.181 days to tee timeUSEM::VOUTSELASTue Jan 02 1990 14:4610
      I guess I don't understand that I swing at 45 degrees , and not
    90 , and that these clubs adjust for that?
         Are you (some guy) talking about upright rather than flat
    swing?? 90 is complete upright and 45 flat ala Ray Floyd.??
         Was there anything to drink during this conversation?
          The average would then be 67.50??
                               Happy New year,Angelo
                                        
    
         
837.2MAMIE::GORDONWed Jan 03 1990 08:416
    wilson introduced the 45 degree concept about three years ago.....
    
    there is nothing really new with this...only a new set of clubs
    that use the same principle....
    
    
837.3Straight form their Advertising HypeFINALY::SCHNEIHCHal Schneider-Something's FishyTue Jan 23 1990 11:0848
    The 45% principal has to due with how the club rotates when you hit the
    ball off-center.  Peripheral weighted clubs are weighted all the way
    around the circumference of the club based on the concept that on an
    off-centered hit the club face is going to rotate (twist) around an
    axis which is 90 degrees to the ground.  Wilson claims that the
    clubface is going to rotate (twist) around an axis which is parallel to
    the shaft of the club which at impact should be ROUGHLY 45 degrees to
    the ground.  Therefore, they place the majority of the weight in the
    upper toe and lower heel.   A very crude diagram follows:
    
                               _
                              //
    			     //
                            //
                           //
                          //
                         //
           |     /      //
           |    /      //
           |   /      //
     . . . | ./      //
     . W   | /    . //
     .     |/ <------.------ 45 degree axis assumed by Wilson      
     .     |      W .        (W equal weight concentrations)
     ...../|........
         / |
        /  |  <- rotation axis assumed for most peripheral weighted clubs
    
    This weighting system supposedly compensates for the off-center hit,
    making the club more forgiving.  They have done this with thgeir woods
    also and done extnesive testing with Iron Byrum.  When offsetting the
    hit 1/2 inch toward the toe and then 1/2 inch toward the heel, they
    compared the Ultra actual landing spots to about six other clubs, all
    name brand.  I have a video tape of the actual testing.   The Ultra did
    land closer to the spot where a perfectly hit shot would land than any
    of the other clubs usually only 3-5 yards off target.
    
    Keep in mind that this was all advertising hype, and it did'nt appear
    that the improvement was as dramatic when they tested the irons.  I
    must admit that I agree with eth concept in theory.
    
    Incidentally, I am considering buying a set of these clubs.  If I do I
    will give a complete review later.  Set of irons, 3-PW runs $380 at my
    pro shop.
    
    Hit 'em straight.
    
    Hal 
837.4I like them39628::ACRAMERThu Jul 12 1990 10:3035
    Well, anyone else got a set of these?
    
    I have been using my new set of ULTRAs for a little over a month now
    and like them alot.  The only trouble I have with them is figuring
    out where I'm pointing them since they look so different from my
    old (1971 MacGregors) clubs.  The progressive offset and the thicker
    top line give a different look and the first round I played saw me hit
    some weird looking shots.  This problem has decreased each time I've
    played (only about 5 times) with them.
    
    One of the reasons I got new clubs was the discovery that I needed an
    upright lie.  I'd been hitting an inordinate amount of half fat shots
    that went short and right.  My divots were deep at the toe, too.
    When I went to a pro shop they determined that I needed the up right
    lie to keep from hitting the ground with the toe of the club.
    The Ultras I got are 1.5� upright and I haven't hit a short, right, fat
    shot yet!
    
    Also my mishits don't seem to be as bad as they used to be, though
    they feel bad.  I assume that this is the perimeter weighting.
    Solid shots feel great.  Haven't learned yet to translate the feel into
    what I did wrong, yet, since, like the look, the feel is very
    different.
    
    My only concern with them is my sudden inability to chip.  I seem to
    be blading all my chip shots since I got the new clubs.  Chipping used
    to be a strong point of my game, but, not now.  I'm hoping it is just
    getting used to the new look and feel and not something inherent in the
    clubs.
    
    All in all I'd recommend that anyone interested in a new set give them
    a look.
    
    Alan
    
837.5Lower your Handicap by 8FINALY::SCHNEIHCHal Schneider-Something&#039;s FishySat Jul 14 1990 01:3814
    Actually, I did decide to get a set (see earlier note) and I love
    them!!  In January I was carrying a 25 handicap (we play all year here
    in South Carolina).  My last handicap card, dated 6/21/90, gives me a
    17!!!  A month after I bought these clubs I shot my all time personal
    best, a 78.  Now, I'm not saying it's all in the clubs, but they have
    given me alot more confidence in my game.  I had to get a flat lie for
    my set and chipping was the most difficult to get settled down after I
    realized that I needed one less club for almost every shot.  I went
    from a 7 iron for 150 yds to an 8 iron.  The first several rounds I
    played, I was overshooting every green.
    
    They ain't cheap, but they were well worth it for me!!
    
    Hal
837.6Advice soughtMR1PST::LEARN0::MUTHThu Jul 22 1993 13:1913
     I'm in the market for a set of irons, and was considering the Wilson
     Ultra 45's.   I've heard some good things about these irons, tried
     them (in a net), and added them to my short list (along with the Edge
     GS and Ping Eye 2.)  I'm also cheap, and want to spend around $40 per
     club, so I've been mainly looking at used clubs.

     Edwin Watts advertises a set of '92 irons (2-PW) for $369, and I've
     seen a set of used '93 Ultras (3-SW + LW) for $400.  Are there any
     significant changes between the '92s and the '93s?  Any
     recommendations or warnings?

     Bill
837.7try the 'factory'CTHQ::WOODCOCKMon Jul 26 1993 10:1316
Bill,

I've been looking around myself for an iron set. I was in the 
"Golf Club Factory" in Framingham (just west of Bennigan's) and think I saw a 
replica set of Ping Eye 2's being custom made for about $200. They actually 
have several sets which look to be about exact replicas of several brands for 
about the same price. I can't remember if the Wilson's were there but it might 
be. It appears to be a good deal *if* they are in fact the exact heads minus 
the name. I have no idea how good the shaft quality is though. I think there 
is also a sale of some sort at the Bayside Expo Center this week which might 
be worth checking into.

best regards,
brad...