T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
507.1 | lawsuits = free advertising?? | MAMIE::GORDON | | Tue Jan 24 1989 09:14 | 3 |
| sounds like they're trying to generate revenue or advertising because
I have a wilson 1200GE metal wood that is at least 5 years old....
So after all this time why the law suit? = revenue/advertising...!!
|
507.2 | speaking of lawsuits | DCSVAX::MCCARTHY | | Tue Jan 24 1989 10:46 | 7 |
| speaking of lawsuits, did anyone happen to read in the Herald on
Sat that Spalding is suing Acushnet because of patent infringment
on the surlyn cover and if Spalding wins the case Acushnet could
go out of business? Wouldn't that have a major effect on the golf
world?
Steve Mc (first time reply - many time reader)
|
507.3 | titleist still #1 ball in golf!! | WILKIE::GORDON | | Tue Jan 24 1989 16:34 | 3 |
| I was under the impression that E.I.DUPONT owns all the patents
reguarding the surlyn covers used in golf balls....?????
|
507.4 | | ENGINE::WARFIELD | Gone Golfing | Tue Jan 24 1989 17:35 | 15 |
| Re: < Note 507.1 by MAMIE::GORDON >
> So after all this time why the law suit? = revenue/advertising...!!
I believe that the practical legal matter is that if another company
tried to use the GE trademark and GE sued them the other company could
prove that the trademark was no longer valid if GE knew about a prior
infringement and didn't prosecute.
Re: A couple ago about Titleist going out of business if they lost
their suit.
So what would the pros play?
Larry
|
507.5 | -< I'LL TAKE A SET >- | BPOV04::LONGO | | Wed Jan 25 1989 10:12 | 3 |
| Who has the 1200GE on sale? And how much?
Bert
|