T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
44.1 | You're right! | STKTSC::LITBY | The bugger isn't round! | Thu Sep 25 1986 09:06 | 6 |
| An albatross, or double eagle as you call it in the U.S, is by
definition a score of three under par on a hole. Which means that
it is perfectly possible to achieve an albatross on a par-4.
I don't know if it would be possible to drive a par-5. Has anyone
heard of it happening?
|
44.2 | Albatross = Dodo | SMLONE::SPT_BRINKLEY | | Thu Sep 25 1986 15:34 | 8 |
| I have also heard a double eagle called a Dodo for the extinct
bird (how appropriate). I'm sure it would be possible to drive a
par 5 on a very windy day and on a very short hole that also had
a dogleg. In fact there was a guy written up in Golf Magazine that
hits a very long ball. He reached a couple of the unreachables (par
5s that have never seen a ball in 2) with low irons. Someone like
that has surely gotten lucky once or twice. Better than that can
you imagine the odds on a Double Dodo (albatross).
|
44.3 | Where the Wild Goose Goes! | NANUCK::REHOR | | Sun Sep 28 1986 18:00 | 6 |
|
While technically a double eagle is 3 under par, and you can get
3 under par on a par four, the correct term would thus be a "hole
in one". A double eagle therefore be attainable only on par 5's
or heaven forbid, par 6's.
|
44.4 | | NAC::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Mon Sep 29 1986 18:08 | 7 |
| re:.-1
So you're saying if I get a hole-in-one on a par 3 it's not correct to call it
an eagle?
-mark
|
44.5 | Traditions die hard | SMLONE::SPT_BRINKLEY | | Tue Sep 30 1986 14:43 | 4 |
| That's correct. I did a little research last night and a hole-in-one
is always an ace even though it may also be an eagle or double eagle.
Roger
|