| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 1200.1 | extensive console-level diagnostics | VYGER::BRYCEG |  | Fri May 16 1997 04:10 | 53 | 
|  |     
    In manufacturing we use console-level diagnostics extensively and have
    found them to be excellent in system/module diagnosis.
    
    >>> there is nothing like a 'test nnn' which can be issued
    
    Below is a list of options available for testing via the console - 
    
    P04>>>help test
    NAME
             test
    FUNCTION
    
    SYNOPSIS
             test [-qualifier] [option]
                    where qualifier:
                    q - quiet
                    t <time> - run time
                    omit <device> - omit device
                    v - verbose
                    where option:
                    kn* CPU
                    ms* Memory
                    ti* TIOP
                    dw* Bus Adapter
                    xm* Bus
                    fb* Bus
                    kf* Adapter
                    ci* Adapter
                    de* Adapter
                    kd* Adapter
                    kz* Adapter
                    ex* Units
                    fx* Units
                    du* Units
                    ds* Units
                    dk* Units
                    mu* Units
                    mk* Units)
    
    As you can see the console-level diagnostics are very extensive,and can
    be used to isolate system failures quite easily.
    
    There is also further console-level diagnostics available which are
    used in manufacturing.
    
    Gordon Bryce
    
    (Stage 1 Manufacturing)
    
     
    
    
 | 
| 1200.2 |  | HARMNY::CUMMINS |  | Fri May 16 1997 10:46 | 3 | 
|  |     BTW, Rawhide implements TEST as well. And both 8X00 and 4X00 provide a
    full suite of power-up tests. Finally, operating system based tools
    such as DEC VET are provided for O/S-based testing.
 | 
| 1200.3 | so where did this come from ? | FIREBL::LEEDS | From VAXinated to Alphaholic | Fri May 16 1997 12:01 | 8 | 
|  | Supposedly, this came out by a couple of major customers at a Digital 
Technology meeting a couple of weeks ago in Nashua. The claim from the other 
customers (which my customer overheard) was that due to the lack of 
diagnostics and unstability of the TLaser, they forced DEC to replaced them 
with DEC 7000s. This made my customer very wary of using 8400s in a 
production environment. Any idea where I can get more details on this issue?
ASrlan
 | 
| 1200.4 |  | HARMNY::CUMMINS |  | Wed May 21 1997 09:17 | 14 | 
|  |     Do you know if the lack of diagnostics and instability statement was
    directed at DEC VET or at console/powerup-based diagnostics? I'd be
    willing to bet that TurboLaser has more ROM-based, test-directed
    diagnostics than probably any other computer system in the world.
    
    DEC VET on SMP UNIX systems was highly unstable, and indeed broken.
    Perhaps this is what the customer was referring to? My understanding
    is that this SMP issue with UNIX/VET has since been fixed.
    
    If there's any way you could provide more details about the customer
    complaint/claim, I'd love to hear them.
    
    Thanks,
    BC
 |