| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 2144.1 | VAXC RTL misinterpreting VMS condition codes? | AQUA::SCHULLMAN | Dan Schullman | Tue Jun 06 1989 04:17 | 75 |
| 2144.2 | Partial answer | TLE::DANIELS | They'll fix it. They fix everything. | Tue Jun 06 1989 15:05 | 14 |
| 2144.3 | VAXC RTL only looking at STS$M_CODE condition bits? | AQUA::SCHULLMAN | Dan Schullman | Wed Jun 07 1989 03:17 | 122 |
| 2144.4 | My brain is still in neutral... | TLE::DANIELS | They'll fix it. They fix everything. | Wed Jun 07 1989 12:41 | 21 |
| 2144.5 | 0x09038012 is NOT the value of SS$_BADPARAM | AQUA::SCHULLMAN | Dan Schullman | Wed Jun 07 1989 15:53 | 89 |
| 2144.6 | VMS-style handling CAN be restored | AQUA::SCHULLMAN | Dan Schullman | Wed Jun 07 1989 15:58 | 122 |
| 2144.7 | QAR 00195 entered | AQUA::SCHULLMAN | Dan Schullman | Thu Jun 08 1989 13:48 | 11 |
| 2144.8 | until fixed, what STS$M_CODES should be avoided? | AQUA::SCHULLMAN | Dan Schullman | Thu Jun 08 1989 14:26 | 45 |
| 2144.9 | VMS message numbers/codes to avoid, until fixed | AQUA::SCHULLMAN | Dan Schullman | Thu Jun 08 1989 17:49 | 164 |
| 2144.10 | some comments on VAXC$ESTABLISH documentation | AQUA::SCHULLMAN | Dan Schullman | Fri Jul 28 1989 12:38 | 38
|