T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2815.1 | A somewhat familiar question; how much you wanna spend ? | ULTRA::BURGESS | Mad Man across the water | Thu Jan 09 1992 13:30 | 8 |
| re .0
Platform loyalists are hereby advised
incoming - - DUCK !
|
2815.2 | hardware-bias-free reply | SALSA::MOELLER | Some dissembling required. | Thu Jan 09 1992 13:45 | 12 |
| The only way to get hardcopy of MIDI sequences is to run a software
package on some sort of personal computer with a laser or bitmap
pin-driven printer.
I'm resisting my usual kneejerk response as to exactly WHAT computer
you should consider. There are a small number of topics in here..
try keywords like 'scoring' (and you thought that conference was gone!)
and do dir/title='printing', etc. Regarding hardware choice, Fehsken's
Law states that the software should determine the hardware.. choose the
software functionality and the hardware choice falls out automatically.
karl
|
2815.3 | | MANTHN::EDD | Daze of the weak... | Thu Jan 09 1992 14:18 | 3 |
| You may want to do a "DIR/KEY=SCORING" and read those notes.
Edd
|
2815.4 | Could be cheaper than you think... | ATIS01::ASHFORTH | | Thu Jan 09 1992 14:23 | 17 |
| Make sure you consider the option of a score tablet plus a good pencil or pen.
Seriously, there seem to be two types of scoring packages out there: expensive
and difficult to work with (which produce good output), and cheap and difficult
(usually) to work with (which have distinct limitations).
Considering the expense if that's the *only* reason you're buying a computer,
especially since you'll also need a high-quality output device (I'd recommend
laser), you should consider seriously whether you'll actually be saving any time
at all, and *if* you are, whether it's worth it. A handwritten score is every bit
as acceptable ass a printed one at the copyright office, and if one of your
songs "makes it" you don't have to sweat the details of getting it printed.
Of course, if you've already considered all this and decided it *is* worth it
to you...oh, well- never mind...
Bob
|
2815.5 | | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | ECADSR::Sherman DTN 223-3326 | Thu Jan 09 1992 14:45 | 14 |
| I used to write it all down very carefully. I don't write music down
anymore, unless I'm away from my tape recorder or it's just to complex to
hum. When a song is sequenced I never even think of getting it scored.
That's because there's just too much that doesn't convert well over to
that format (aftertouch, pitch-bends, sysex, patches, levels and on and
on). You might consider exactly why it is that you want to dump to
hard copy. If it's for posterity or for other musicians, that's
probably a good reason. If it's to secure copyright or some such, a score
may not be necessary. Even if you really have to have a score, it
might be worth while to check with your friends or other contacts to
see if you can bum the resources for a while. If you're like me, most
of the time spent on music may not involve scores anymore.
Steve
|
2815.6 | Retitled by co-mod... | MANTHN::EDD | Daze of the weak... | Thu Jan 09 1992 15:27 | 3 |
| I retitled the note, as it appears to have little to do with the M1.
Edd
|
2815.7 | Scoring, printing, etc. | TANNAY::BETTELS | Cheryl, Eur. Ext. Res. Prg., DTN 821-4022 | Fri Jan 10 1992 04:36 | 49 |
| I come at computer music from the other side. We already had the computer
(in fact three Ataris plus the SPECTRE Macintosh emmulator plus a couple of
laptops). I bought a synthesizer JUST so I could run it with a notation
program do get printed music although I'm finding it has other (�fun!) uses
also :-) I need to transpose music for my marching band, I am composing
orchestral arrangements for children, etc. and it is easier to play it in
a voice at a time, score it, transpose it, etc. and then get good copy printed
output. Handwritten is the pits, particularly if you're a flutist and have to
read all those handwritten ledger lines.
1. On printers. We have the HP inkjet and nowadays I would choose this over
either matrix or laser. Laser gives marginally better copy for a MUCH
higher price. Dot matrix is sloppy looking and not very readable. Today,
good notation programs support outline PostScript fonts which give very
readable text parts and beautiful notation. Inkjet has come a long way.
It is no longer messy, in fact replacing the cartridge is less messy and
easier than replacing the toner on our laser printers here at work.
2. On notation programs. Expect, at the low end to pay around $100 and at
the upper end $600+. I now have a copy of MusicWriter which cost about $120
which I am going to sell because the MIDI part of it doesn't work with
SPECTRE. I found it simple to use, gives great output, has all the
functionality I needed (transposition, percussion notation, voice
synchronisation, lyrics, expandable to produce scores with up to 16 voices,
etc.) I bought it just to see if this is a reasonable thing to try and do
and now that I've got a bit of experience and know what is missing (like
inflexibility in note spacing and such), I will now get what I really want.
There are also a few public domain programs out there which you might try
just to see how the things work. The best is to find someone who has the
appropriate computer and sit down and try it.
3. On computers. I will now by Notator because we already have the Atari
with built in MIDI port. If you are mostly concerned about the appearance
of printed text elements and will use it in conjunction with outline fonts
and laser or inkjet printer, the Macintosh has the most potential (more
font availability). You can still do well with either a pc, Atari, Amiga,
or just about anything. Consider your target configuration before buying,
not just the notation software and machine. I got into trouble because
I didn't realize that the MIDI blackbox for Macintosh was incompatible with
the SPECTRE emulator I was running.
4. BIGGEST ADVICE: Take the time to really look through this notes file. Do
several directories with keywords. It is a big job to filter all the info
in here but it is well worth the time. Check the machine related notes
conferences also. Almost every one of them has a topic devoted to
notation programs running on that particular machine.
Cheryl
|
2815.8 | Music Printer Plus?? | DENVER::WILSONS | | Wed Jan 15 1992 12:23 | 6 |
|
Cheryl and the others: thanks for the information. I looked
at a demo of the Finale' and Encore products....both would do the
trick, Finale' seems more complicated. I also have heard of
Music Printer plus....anyone out there with specific knowledge
of this product...especially the ease-of-use issue!!!
|
2815.9 | | DECWIN::FISHER | I *hate* questionnaires--Worf | Thu Jan 16 1992 14:00 | 6 |
| Temporal Acuity Products will send you a demo disk of MPP for $10. Their number
is 800-426-2673.
Ditto for Finale by Coda: 800-843-2066
Burns
|
2815.10 | See note 2413 | BAVIKI::good | Michael Good | Fri Jan 17 1992 08:59 | 4 |
| See note 2413 and replies for more information about Music
Printer Plus. The composer this workstation is named after
swears by the product, and he had no use for or knowledge
of computers before he started using it.
|