T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2671.1 | another tack | EZ2GET::STEWART | No, I mean Real Music. | Fri Jun 28 1991 15:49 | 8 |
|
You could do this a lot easier with x-10 stuff. Check out the x-10
conference. Sorry, can't remember the node off hand...
\John
|
2671.2 | | KOBAL::DICKSON | I watched it all on my radio | Fri Jun 28 1991 16:56 | 6 |
| I know about X-10 stuff, and I thought it was kind of overkill.
I don't need to switch 300 watts, just momentarily ground something
less than a milliwatt for a second.
The X-10 switches, besides being mechanically very noisy ("whack!", not
really appropriate for studio use), are rather big and bulky.
|
2671.3 | pls forgive the line noise | EZ2GET::STEWART | No, I mean Real Music. | Fri Jun 28 1991 17:46 | 10 |
|
Big & bulky, yes, but they're off the shelf. Actually, what I had in
mind was the little relay module. I forget the actual designation,
but they offer a set of dry contacts which you can selecte� to be
either momentary contact or on/off.
But I'd be interested in hearing about a MIDI solution, too.
|
2671.4 | | KOBAL::DICKSON | I watched it all on my radio | Fri Jun 28 1991 17:56 | 25 |
| Ah, I didn't know about relay-closure modules.
The only trouble is for my application I would have to use a whole
bunch of house codes. While the only installation of this would be
in an industrial building, I would prefer not to leave the studio
open to unauthorized "remote control" over the power lines.
Especially considering what is already on those power lines. (Like
the clocks in ZKO get sync signals over the power, and there are
other things that are not so compatible with X-10 signals.)
MIDI has lots more address space. I visualize a one-unit rack module
with screw terminals on the back for hooking up to a rack's worth
of cassette machines (say 8) with two or three controls per machine
(STOP, PLAY, and REWIND). Set thumbwheel on the box to set the
MIDI channel it listens to, then use controller on/off messages to
control the relays.
I could have up to 16 racks of 8 machines each, on a single control
cable. This is more than I can see needing.
The application, by the way, is a computer controlled scheduled
playback of recorded material at certain times of the day, so you
don't have to have a guy show up every 30 minutes to play the next
tape.
|
2671.5 | A place to start... | CSC32::MOLLER | Fix it before it breaks | Fri Jun 28 1991 18:03 | 8 |
| Sometime last year, Electronic Musician had a kit/do it your self
article for this sort of thing. It had 8 switched outputs that
were tied to midi note #, and the midi channel was selectable.
Someone had a PC card and would program the EPROMs for you. I thought
about this for a lighting controller, but ran out of midi channels
in my rack set up (yes, all 16 are allocated for something).
Jens
|
2671.6 | inquiring minds, etc.... | EZ2GET::STEWART | No, I mean Real Music. | Fri Jun 28 1991 19:28 | 14 |
|
Does the sound have to go to a lot of different places, too? If so,
the separate machine approach facilitates this routing requirement.
If not, you could use one of the PC voice mail cards to store the sound
data, and write a little bit of code to access and playback these files
according to your schedule. Disk space requirements are proportional
to your need for fidelity. The card I have (Bigmouth) uses about 3k
per second for reasonable quality speech. If you want to check it out,
call (714) 499-5454.
So what's this thing going to be used for, really?
|
2671.7 | lights on | TOOK::SUDAMA | Living is easy with eyes closed... | Sun Jun 30 1991 13:55 | 10 |
| Nothing nearly so sophisticated, but I'm interested in some of the same
technology. What I'd like to do is simply be able to turn on a light
from a MIDI command. What I have in mind is that I have a lot of
sequences that repeat some chorus over and over at the end, and my
singer and I can never remember exactly how many times to repeat. It
would be great if I could put a small light on our monitor speaker that
would go on at the start of the last refrain. Isn't there anything off
the shelf that could be used for something like this?
- Ram
|
2671.8 | | PAULUS::BAUER | Richard - ISE L10N Center Frankfurt | Mon Jul 01 1991 06:07 | 7 |
| Hi !
I think DOEPFER Electronics has something like that, but I don't know about the
distribution channels inthe States (if at all). But I can find out if you want.
Just let me know.
Richard
|
2671.9 | | PRNSYS::LOMICKAJ | Jeffrey A. Lomicka | Mon Jul 01 1991 09:27 | 11 |
| This would be trivial to program up on an Atari STe, with a very small
ammount of external hardware (buffers and relays).
You could use any random ST with 8 bits on the printer port, or you
could use the STe with the enhanced "joystick" ports, and use the
bidirectional port bits provided there to drive another 16 or so.
Of course, then you could program the entire application on the ST as
well, and get rid of whatever it is that wakes up every 30 minutes to do
something. Of course, then you wouldn't need the Midi port, and could
just use a clone...
|
2671.10 | | KOBAL::DICKSON | I watched it all on my radio | Mon Jul 01 1991 10:39 | 30 |
| The "buffers and relays" are probably the most expensive part of
building one of these things. 8 bits is probably not enough for
how big this might grow, but is enough to start.
The application is an automated radio station. Professional
broadcast equipment that can do this (used by those FM stations
with no DJs and all pre-programmed music) is quite expensive,
and the kind of equipment that can be controlled this way is
typically not cassette players. The controllers are not very
flexible, either. I need to be able to step to the next selection
based on running time of the previous selection, as not all tapes
will have the sub-sonic tone burst that the pro machines key on.
But for this application, most of the prerecorded stuff will be
in cassette format, not open reel or cartridge.
I was thinking of a simple UART receiving 8 bits, the UART's internal
latch driving the buffers and thence the relays. That would be the
cheapest way to drive 8 switches. A way to extend it is to send
pairs of bytes, with the extra bits being an address to match against
DIP switches.
But a comparator here, a few 8-bit latches there, and pretty soon
it is cheaper to use one of those CPU+RAM+UART chips and do the
decoding in software.
Designs which require a particular type of controlling computer
are not a good idea, so it should be a serial interface.
Off-the-shelf designs are preferred of course.
|