T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2253.1 | First thing that caught MY eye... | WEFXEM::COTE | Bain Dramaged | Thu Feb 01 1990 09:46 | 4 |
| Anything endorsed by Yaron Gershovsky (musical director and keys for
Man-Tran Band) can't be all bad!
Edd
|
2253.2 | not too state of the art | CSC32::MOLLER | Nightmare on Sesame Street | Thu Feb 01 1990 13:04 | 7 |
| EM reviewed it and to me, it looked pretty mediocre. It has
all the editing facilities of a QX7 (read that as practically
none), but it does have SYSEX dump and other file related
facilities. It didn't appear to have enough memory to store
a long or complex song. Avoid it.
Jens
|
2253.3 | gasp | GLOWS::COCCOLI | Thela Hun Gingeet | Thu Feb 01 1990 16:37 | 10 |
|
And an extremely complex UI. Two led segment displays.
Kinda like a mirage......
RC
|
2253.4 | down to $199 | GLOWS::COCCOLI | Thela Hun Gingeet | Thu Feb 22 1990 18:56 | 8 |
|
Just talked to a "keyboard salesperson" at Dr Sound about this
thing. He said it has 64k, which was quoted as 14k events.
RC
|
2253.5 | Brother sequencer/ other cheap sysex recorder.. | DOPEY::DICKENS | What are you pretending not to know ? | Mon Nov 26 1990 12:17 | 6 |
| Does anyone have one of these ? What are they going for ? Has it been
re-released (with fixes) ? They are back to running full page ads in EM...
If I wanted the cheapest easily usable sysex recorder to store my ESQ-1
sequences on, what should I buy ?
|
2253.6 | Me too\ | FULCRM::PICKETT | David - Brahms Berman Requiem? | Tue Nov 27 1990 10:49 | 7 |
| ditto -.1
I was just re-looking into one of these, and wanted it for the exact
same application: wicked cheap storage of my ESQ sysex fodder. I second
the request for hands on experience.
dp
|
2253.7 | Brother info, brother... | TLE::ASHFORTH | | Wed Nov 28 1990 14:35 | 8 |
| If I remember correctly, EM did a review on these little beasties within the
last six months or so. I recall reading that they were relatively simple
implementations, with no real claim to displace computer-based sequencers. They
seem more appropriate as a portable way to capture stuff to take back and use
with your "real" sequencer.
If anyone's interested, I can look in my back issues for the review (or lack
thereof).
|
2253.8 | | GLOWS::COCCOLI | I defy gravity | Wed Nov 28 1990 18:52 | 13 |
|
Dr Sound (NYC) is selling MDI30's for $139.
I may be picking one up tomorrow night to use as a midi filer.
I think their are two flavor's of this beast..MDI30 and 40. A review
will be in order....
RichC
|
2253.9 | Poor editing capability | CLADA::ODEA | John O'Dea GAO DTN 822-2456 | Thu Nov 29 1990 07:22 | 7 |
| I got a demo of this in Daddys, Salem a month or two back. As I recall,
you can record six MIDI tracks. However there's very limited editing
capability, the tracks are overlaid as you record, so that once you've
recorded , I don't beleive you can get at any track individually. They
were pushing it as a handy way of storing sysex dumps.
John
|
2253.10 | another gizmo.. | GLOWS::COCCOLI | I defy gravity | Thu Nov 29 1990 20:30 | 19 |
|
I just put down $20 on a used MDI 40. This one has an eight character
lcd display as opposed to the two character Led display on the
MDI 30.
It has a 14k event mem, as Brian previously supplied, and the
disk can hold 58k.
One attractive feature of the MDI 40 is that you can filter pitchbend
and aftertouch messages. At home, with my 2 MMT8's, I have no way
to do this and use an enormous (midi-guitar) amount of memory on
the simplest of PB's, as well as a ridiculous amount of time backing
the MMT8's up to (gasp) *tape*.
Hope this helps. Even if it doesn't, for $119 I get a nice bookend.
RichC
|
2253.11 | | GLOWS::COCCOLI | I defy gravity | Mon Dec 03 1990 17:43 | 24 |
|
Having lived with it over the weekend, I can now say the $119
was money well spent.
I'm able to dump 80% of the MMT's memory in sysex into the MDI40
and store it on disk (it takes approx 25% of the disk).
My Roland D110's entire sysex dump took 15% of a disk's space.
I'm also able to store approx 7 songs (midi data) on a disk, and
the machine has pretty fast disk access..about 5-8 seconds for any
one song. Chain play mode is pretty useful...gives me time to tune
the guitar between songs.
As for writing a song using this thing..no way. Zero editing,
only punching in and out. I'll stick to the MMT8's for that. They
have to be the quickest and easiest sequencers to compose on, period.
Definately a great, cost effctive little device.
RichC
|
2253.12 | Thanks | FULCRM::PICKETT | David - Brahms Berman Requiem? | Tue Dec 04 1990 15:51 | 3 |
| Thanks for that review, Rich.
dp (Who will probably get one when I go to NYC next week)
|
2253.13 | mdi 30 vs. 40 | DOPEY::DICKENS | What are you pretending not to know ? | Thu Dec 06 1990 12:41 | 2 |
| Could anyone elucidate the differences between the mdi30 and the mdi40, other
than the size of the display, if any ?
|
2253.14 | Mean gig machine? | CHEFS::BAIN | Alex Bain @REO | Mon Dec 10 1990 13:09 | 15 |
| re .-1
I believe the MDI30 has less memory than the MDI40. Can't remeber
offhand how much less.
Rich - thanks for answering some of the questions I had around this
device - mainly around access time to songs on disk. I'm looking
at it as a possible low cost unit for gigs, having
used an Atari package to make up the original sequences (see
note 1326.36). Looks like it could do this for me for a lot less than
I'd have to pay for any other sequencer with 3.5 inch floppies.
Does the device have MIDI merge? Can you sync it externally to
incoming MIDI clocks?
Alex
|
2253.15 | an mc500 mk II it ain't but... | GLOWS::COCCOLI | monitoring reality | Mon Dec 10 1990 21:52 | 34 |
|
Alex,
It does have midi-merge, if you mean it in the sense of midi "echo".
You can play along with the executing sequence using the midi in.
I don't know about incoming clocks. I'll have to look it up.
The MDI40 holds one song at a time and can store 30 on disk. They
would have to be pretty darn simple songs. I can fit about 5-6 of
mine on a disk.
I believe I read somewhere it holds 14k notes in memory, and can
store 58k notes on disk.
Definately suit's my needs. Previously, using two Alesis MMT8's,
I couldn't do tempo changes. Now, as I record a sequence from the
MMT8 to the MDI40, I can vary the play tempo and the changes are
recorded. Pretty cool.
I used to have to bring my cassette deck from home to a gig, just
in case one of my sequencers dumped it's cookies on power-up and
needed a data reload. Now I can bring just one MMT8, and the Brother.
BTW..It comes with a demo disk of sequences including:
Maple Leaf Rag (not 1/8 as good as Dave O's)
Alfred Hitchcock theme (shoot me classical fans, I don't know the name)
Don't Worry, Be (gag) Happy
and 3 other extremely memorable tunes who's titles I forget.
RichC
|
2253.16 | Trivia | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | len, EMA, LKG2-2/W10, DTN 226-7556 | Wed Dec 12 1990 11:03 | 5 |
| re .15 - the Hitchcock theme music is the "Funeral March of the
Marionettes". I forget the composer.
len.
|
2253.17 | the diff... | GLOWS::COCCOLI | monitoring reality | Tue Dec 18 1990 18:22 | 12 |
|
The main difference between the MDI30 and 40 is internal memory.
The Mdi 30 has half (32K) the mem of the 40 (64k). Same disk drive
(240k, 53k notes).
They also make a better model, the PDC-100 , whick features 128k
internal memory, realtime or step input, cut and paste, tempo changes
inside song and Song Position support. Same disk drive. A 32 character
backlit display. For approx $299.
|
2253.18 | Which one for 100% MMT8 memory? | MACNAS::SALLISON | | Thu Jan 03 1991 04:23 | 10 |
| I use an MMT8 live and need a replacement for *gasp* tape input. We
have 5/6 songs per load and fill in the time between loads with "real"
live performance.
I am looking for the cheapest "non-tape" storage device to use live
which will load 100% of the MMT8's memory.
Which one of the Brother m/c's is capable of this?
...Sean
|
2253.19 | PDC-100 vs Datadisk? | MACNAS::SALLISON | | Tue Mar 26 1991 09:33 | 3 |
| Anybody know how the PDC-100 compares with the Alesis Datadisk?
...Sean
|
2253.20 | MDI40 for live use | CHEFS::BAIN | Alex Bain @REO | Sun Apr 07 1991 10:58 | 60 |
| I had the opportunity of picking up a Brother MDI40 a couple of weeks
ago new for 140 pounds (UK). Thats about 100 pounds less than I can
expect to pay for any other disk filer or sequence playback device
using 3.5 inch disks, so I bought it.
I'm intending to use it on gigs to load other devices with sysex data,
and as a sequence playback machine (I'll initially be driving a Roland
E20). Here's my first impressions so far.....
The disks are formatted to hold up to 30 "songs", where each song is
either a sequence or a sysex dump. In practice, I estimate you will
get 4 - 10 sequences on the disk, depending on the size of sequence.
The internal memory will hold only one song at any time. It takes 4-
30 seconds to load a song from disk to memory. My average so far is
about 20 secs. If the song you want next is'nt on the disk you have
in the machine, you can of course pop in the required disk while the
previous sequence is playing. The first time you try to access a new
disk, there is a disk registration period of about 0-3 secs, depending
on the number of songs on disk (my average is < 1 sec), before you
can start loading the song you want. This means that there is very
little time penalty for loading specials, requests, etc, or for not
working to a preset programme of songs.
The MDI40 will run internal or external synch. With internal synch,
you can vary the playback tempo (unlike the Alesis Datadisk SQ). With
internal synch, you can also suppress sending start, stop & clock
signals. This is a bonus for me driving the E20 - and for anyone else
using a drum machine as an SGU, as it prevents the drum m/c starting up
on it's own.
The UI is very simple. I'm using an Atari with Master Tracks Pro to
build my sequences, and it's very easy to record them into the MDI40.
My singer will be the person running the unit on gigs (she's the one
who chooses the songs), and she's had no problems loading and playing
sequences. I reckon my 11 year old will be able to use this to record
and play back her own piano pieces (another reason I bought a
"sequencer" rather than a file playback device).
Editing facilities are virtually nil - just punch in/out on the record
track. Once you've got a record track you like, you transfer it to a
merge track, leaving your record track free for further work. You
can't modify data once it's on the merge track. I don't plan to use
these facilities, so I have no problems with any lack in this area.
The maximum song size is 14k notes. You can get a pretty
extensive sequence into this, but I've also been able to fill it a few
times - mostly on numbers using complex drum patterns (multiple sets of
16th notes running all the way through the song) and segways (2
numbers back to back). In each case, I've been able to simplify the
sequence, and I don't expect this to be a typical problem, but I
recommend that you look closely at the size and complexity of your
sequences before going for this device.
All in all, Im pretty happy. For a relatively small investment, I get
the opportunity of using sequences on gigs for the first time, and the
sysex dump facility means I no longer have to worry about finding my
synths at a gig with hosed patch memories.
Alex
|
2253.21 | correction | CHEFS::BAIN | Alex Bain @REO | Tue Apr 16 1991 13:34 | 7 |
| Correction to last reply - the price was 180 pounds (still about 100
pounds less than anything else in the UK). Since writing my last note,
I've dumped a few more sequences. I think I must have started with all
my big ones - the ones I've dumped recently seem to leave me with about
40% of the internal memory spare and take 15 seconds or so to load.
Alex
|
2253.22 | PDC-100? | COMPLX::BULLARD | | Fri Sep 27 1991 13:32 | 5 |
| Does anyone have anymore feedback on the PDC-100. Have they
actually purchased one.
chuck (who is very unknowledgable about this stuff but would like
to get a good bang for the buck on my first purchase)
|