[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference napalm::commusic_v1

Title:* * Computer Music, MIDI, and Related Topics * *
Notice:Conference has been write-locked. Use new version.
Moderator:DYPSS1::SCHAFER
Created:Thu Feb 20 1986
Last Modified:Mon Aug 29 1994
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2852
Total number of notes:33157

2213.0. "Music technology of the 1990's - your predictions" by UWRITE::DUBE (Dan Dube 264-0506) Tue Dec 26 1989 09:07

I received a Christmas catalog from E.U. Wurlitzer over the weekend, 
and the first page had a letter from the President, Gene Joly. The 
basic theme of the letter was a reflection on how technology changed 
music in the 80's. (For example, in 1980, the best selling keyboard 
was a Fender Rhodes).

He went on to predict that the 1990's would see a radical slowdown in 
development of new technology/products and more emphasis on refining 
the quality of existing technology.

Any thoughts on this? What is your prediction for the technology of 
music in the next decade?

-Dan
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
2213.1MIZZOU::SHERMANECADSR::SHERMAN 235-8176, 223-3326Tue Dec 26 1989 11:519
    Yeah.  I think there will be a radical slowdown.  Not for lack of
    creativity.  More for lack of money, time and other resources on the
    part of consumers.  Remember when some labor groups were predicting
    that with all these advances we'd have shorter work weeks and more
    spare time?  HA!  Pick two: time, money, MIDI.
    
    	
    
    Steve
2213.2SALSA::MOELLERTue Dec 26 1989 12:104
    Slowdown... bacause of lack of outlets for all the music this
    technology helps us make.
    
    karl
2213.3I Beg To DifferDRUMS::FEHSKENSWed Dec 27 1989 11:5526
    I predict the opposite, but I expect the bulk of the growth to occur
    at the "low end".  I think we are going to see a replay of what's
    happened with cameras - the proliferation of relatively cheap "do
    it all for you" instruments that relieve people of the need to
    understand the technology in any depth.
    
    But, just as autofocus autoexposure autoadvance doesn't make you
    see any better (or teach you how compose an image, or how to break
    the "rules" when the creative opportunity calls for it, etc.), what
    we will get is a flood of mediocre folk art destined for highly
    localized consumption.  There will still be a modest, not growing
    very much market for "pro" or "serious amateur" instruments (like
    the Nikon F4 in the camera world) that are well beyond the reach
    of all but the most serious practitioners; the midrange will fall
    out, and a lot of us will make do with nominally "obsolete" but
    still quite serviceable technology (e.g., no F4 likely for me in
    the near future, but my F3 and FA will keep me going quite nicely
    for a long time yet), because the new gear is either too restrictive
    or too expensive for our needs.
    
    The bulk of the industry will focus on the low end, where large
    production runs can amortize the development costs.  The high end
    will get even higher, in all respects.
    
    len.