T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2205.1 | check your local library under "music" | VIKING::JANZEN | Tom FXO-01/28 228-5421 MSI ECL Test | Wed Dec 13 1989 14:17 | 7 |
| Concert A is around 440Hz. It is used as a tuning reference so that
all the instruments in a group can be in tune together, kind of like
calibrating a set of laboratory signal generators. otherwise they
would play din instaed of music.
The range of the piano is like you know 27.5 to about 4100 hertz.
The range of a flute is about 256 to 2050 hertz.
Tom
|
2205.2 | ah yes, my high school days ... | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | ECADSR::SHERMAN 235-8176, 223-3326 | Wed Dec 13 1989 18:45 | 17 |
| When I was in orchestra, we had to tune to the instrument most likely
to be out of tune. If there was a piano, we tuned to it. If there was
an oboe, we tuned to it. The default was to tune to the concert master
(1st violinist), unless there was a substitute teacher. In such a
situation, the first trombonist would tune with the sub's instrument of
choice (piano, oboe, violin) but have his tuning slide out an extra
half-inch or so and "lip up" to be in tune. Flat by a half- to
quarter-tone, all other trombonists would tune up with the 1st
trombonist who would lip normally. The result was that the entire
trombone section would be in tune, but half- to quarter-tone flat
relative to the rest of the orchestra. This works well, but it's hard
for the trombonists to avoid blowing it by not keeping straight faces
while the sub attempts to get us back in tune, starting by tuning the
1st trombonist with the oboe or whatever (he lips up) and comparing the
tone of the 1st trombonist with each section member (he lips normally).
Steve
|
2205.3 | songs in the key of life | HPSMEG::LEITZ | butch leitz | Thu Dec 14 1989 10:24 | 12 |
|
You have, of course, heard that there is a serious move underfoot
by some pretty big names to have "concert A" reduced from 440 to
426. (I'm not sure if this is the exact number, I thought they were
saying 426, but it might have been 436).
The reason was that the lower A was more "natural" feeling to the
human voice. NPR was doing a bit on this and played two orchestras
doing the same piece at the two different pitches. It -was-
different in a side-by-side, and the A/440 version did sound sharp
at that point.
|
2205.4 | | 4GL::DICKSON | | Thu Dec 14 1989 13:05 | 3 |
| 426 would be a quartertone lower. Sounds unreasonable to me. 436
maybe. Who's gonna retune all those pipe organs, xylophones, and
other untunable stuff?
|
2205.5 | File := Tuning key for a xylophone | TOCATA::PICKETT | David - Beware of the dogma. | Thu Dec 14 1989 16:14 | 9 |
| A=400, A=438, A=426. make up your mind, I'll adjust my synths
accordingly.
I always thought a 'concert' note referred to the absolute pitch of a
note. For example: if a Bb Trumpet plays what is scored as a 'C' on his
score, a Bb sounds. The 'C' note on his score is thus referred to as
'Concert Bb'.
dp
|
2205.6 | organ cipher obligato | TOCATA::PICKETT | David - Beware of the dogma. | Thu Dec 14 1989 16:18 | 7 |
| By the way, organs are NOT 'untunable'. Most of them would lead you to
believe that because of the way they sound, but this is not true. The
diapason pipes (round metal ones) have caps that can extend them, and
shorten them. The stoppers on stoppered wooden pipes are adjustable.
And the reeds have tensioners which tune the reed.
dp
|
2205.7 | reason for 'lowering'... | MIDI::DAN | All things are possible... | Thu Dec 14 1989 16:44 | 12 |
|
I read somewhere recently (though can't remember where) that the move
to bring Concert A 'down' is because over the last few centuries, it's
been steadily raised to give orchestras a 'better sound'.
In the chart I saw, it said that Concert A was originally around
420 hz, I think, but now, hundreds of years later, it's up to about
460 hz on the average for big name orchestras. The big-time classical
buffs are trying to 'protect' the original arrangements by bring
the note back down.
Dan
|
2205.8 | imagine the possibilities | CNTROL::GEORGE | no hardcore on the car radio | Thu Dec 14 1989 16:46 | 6 |
| I wouldn't worry just yet. Lyndon Larouche was one of the great musical
strategists pushing for the change. Perhaps A=440 is a commie plot to
strain and corrupt the voices of our divas? First they got Callas, then???
Enjoy,
Dave
|
2205.9 | A PLOT! | WEFXEM::COTE | Call *who* Ishmael??? | Thu Dec 14 1989 16:56 | 3 |
| Don't those ne'er_do_goods at Roland tune to 442hz?
Edd
|
2205.10 | | TALK::HARRIMAN | 28 below zero, C or F? | Tue Dec 19 1989 08:26 | 8 |
|
re: .6
Organs may be tunable, but you can spend a LOT of time on even a small
organ, tuning it. How many pipes in your average organ? No wonder they
are out of tune half the time.
/pjh
|
2205.11 | My R-Word Is Sharper Than Your Y-Word | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Wed Dec 27 1989 09:27 | 4 |
| re .9 - yes, the Roland standard is A = 442Hz.
len.
|