T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2157.1 | Probably nada... | WEFXEM::COTE | OK, who wants a Tangwich??? | Thu Nov 09 1989 09:26 | 18 |
| Nice idea, but I bet it gets squashed by corporate...
Not to long ago I got involved in writing a story that sprang out of
the FELINE:: notes file. We had intended to have the story published
in one of the cat mags (kitty comix?).
Because it mentioned Digital and it's products we ran the article thru
P.R. To make the story short, the last I heard is they didn't care to
be mentioned because some stock-holder may get upset we were using
corporate resources for personal reasons. Yes, I know these conferences
have the corporate blessing but I'm simply relaying the story as best
I know it...
...hate to be a wet blanket but be prepared for disappointment.
Try anyhow...
Edd
|
2157.2 | go for it | NORGE::CHAD | Ich glaube Ich t�te Ich h�tte | Thu Nov 09 1989 09:30 | 8 |
| You don't have to mention DEC or anything similar. Just explain that at
a certain company with a worldwide computer network there is a midi forum.
That is all that is necessary. Of course, phrase it a bit better than I did.
Chad
sho_gives_permission_to_reprint_anything_ive_said_in_commusic_as_long_as
_i_myself_remain_faceless
|
2157.3 | | HAZEL::STARR | We're beating plowshares into swords... | Thu Nov 09 1989 09:49 | 11 |
| I wouldn't even say that it is a company resournce. Why not just say that you
are an active participant of an international electronic billboard. No further
info need be given.
As far as notes go, I suggest that it may be best to get permission from the
author of such notes before publishing them elsewhere. It may be a pain, but
it could save you a LOT of hassles later on, and also seems like the 'right
thing to do'.
Alan S.
not_an_expert-just_an_opinion
|
2157.4 | a few comments - I'm going to pursue this | CSOA1::SCHAFER | Brad - boycott hell. | Thu Nov 09 1989 10:29 | 49 |
| >how to (or should it?) avoid specific mention of DIGITAL ?
From a corporate standpoint, it should not mention Digital. Like Edd
said, some stockholders think that personal endeavors mean less bux for
them and whine. Images and all that rot...
Anyway, any specific references to DEC would need to be deleted, as
would node names, usernames, personal addresses, etc. You'd also have
to watch "personal names" to make certain there weren't any
(non-)arcane references to future products.
>how could one explain the existence of a worldwide WAN without
>discussing its topology and DECnet capability ?
Like has been mentioned earlier, just don't say anything about it. We
have a worldwide WAN with "sophisticated bulletin board software" which
allows us to have "personal interest newsgroups" or something along
those lines.
>if, as I'd like to, I included extracts of particularly informative or
>funny reply exchanges, how could that be done without identifying the
>contributors ?
It would *have* to be done, as such headers would give away the
software (unless that's an objective). It is against corporate policy,
I believe, to make internal NODE::USERNAME combinations available to
the outside world.
Perhaps you could use an EDT or TECO macro to reformat headers? It
shouldn't be too hard to whip one up. And like I said ealier, you'll
want to come up with some username -> alias table to ensure employee
anonymity. Just do string subs in the text you've extracted. Again,
make sure no names &/or addresses are contained in any postings.
>do YOU have any thoughts as to
> a. should it be written at all
> b. specificity (?) about DEC and noter identities
> c. .............
I don't know what the music comix is ... but I think that you should
make certain that you've read PP&P for dissemination of internal
information. Given the new policies (viz, *I* am responsible for this
conference), good judgement would be appreciated.
I, too, think this conference is quite invaluable, and would be very
interesting to relate to "outsiders" (as I've done verbally many times
in the past). The problem is in the *printing*.
-b
|
2157.5 | make up notes | MILKWY::JANZEN | cf. ANT::CIRCUITS,ANT::UWAVES | Thu Nov 09 1989 11:03 | 4 |
| I would check with legal. I expect that everything written in this
conference is owned by Digital.
Tom
Copyright 1989 Thomas E. Janzen
|
2157.6 | I tried the 'vague' approach... | WEFXEM::COTE | OK, who wants a Tangwich??? | Thu Nov 09 1989 11:13 | 16 |
| Let me be the devil's advocate...
When I did the FELINE story, I purposely only made vague reference to
an "international electronic bulletin board". The first thing the
publisher did was return the story and requested more details (where,
who, what...) about the bulletin board. That's when the story headed
for legal, P.R., etc...
It's now been back and forth 2-3 times as "corporate opinion" and
editorial whimsy changed...
Don't expect the story to be accepted without many requests for change
from the editor, and realize that the editor's wants don't always line
up with DEC's...
Edd
|
2157.7 | chiseling away at the truth | SWAV1::STEWART | There is no dark side of the moon... | Thu Nov 09 1989 12:22 | 14 |
| Do what they do on TV: docu-fiction. You can synthesize the
network as the product of a faceless multi-national corporation.
The look-up table to cross-reference your character's names with
the original notes authors is a good idea.
Devil's advocate time: publish every thing straight off the wire
under a pseudonym! It's only a job, right?
Are you going to change the names of the products referenced
also?
/s/
John_who_believes_in_truth_without_regard_for_stockholder_fantasies
|
2157.8 | | VIKING::JANZEN | cf. ANT::CIRCUITS,ANT::UWAVES | Thu Nov 09 1989 13:33 | 3 |
| If I see anything I wrote under someone else's name, I will try to find
a cheap lawyer.
Tom
|
2157.9 | I think I just changed my mind... | SALSA::MOELLER | Fun with Frangibles | Thu Nov 09 1989 15:36 | 16 |
| ><<< Note 2157.8 by VIKING::JANZEN "cf. ANT::CIRCUITS,ANT::UWAVES" >>>
> If I see anything I wrote under someone else's name, I will try to find
> a cheap lawyer. Tom
I'll be sure to misquote you accurately.
---------------
Brad, the 'Music Comix' are Keyboard, EM, Music Technology, KCS, and
others.
---------------
Actually, I'm intimidated by the task of talking about Commusic without
specifically mentioning DEC, the Easynet, or VAXnotes. It would be so
watered down as to be pretty meaningless.
karl
|
2157.10 | they're all cheap, but most want $$$ | SWAV1::STEWART | There is no dark side of the moon... | Thu Nov 09 1989 17:54 | 13 |
|
re:.7
If I see anything I wrote under someone else's name, I will try to find
a cheap lawyer.
John
Sounded like a challenge to me...
|
2157.11 | | IAMOK::CROWLEY | We want.....a shrubbery! | Fri Nov 10 1989 08:33 | 12 |
|
re .8
>If I see anything I wrote under someone else's name, I will try to
>find a cheap lawyer.
If you wrote it under someone elses name, how will he know its yours?
:^) :^)
Ralph
|
2157.12 | opinion was 'doubtful' | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - boycott hell. | Fri Nov 10 1989 10:00 | 7 |
| The moderator conference basically said the same things we did here
(goto PSA, etc). Also mentioned some silly boy who was trying extract
something from the FELINE conference....
Edd sure gets around, eh?
-b
|
2157.13 | Ahem... | GUESS::YERAZUNIS | It works fine, provided you _want_ things to explode upon arriva | Sat Nov 18 1989 09:26 | 6 |
|
If I see anyone I note under someone elses lawyer, I will try to find a
cheap bottle.
-Bill
|