T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2085.1 | Hey, Automatically compose THIS! | ANT::JANZEN | cf. ANT::CIRCUITS,ANT::UWAVES | Wed Aug 16 1989 11:18 | 14 |
| I have written some automatic composition programs. Automatic
composition goes back at least to the 50's. At the computer museum
in boston
you can hear /see a kurweil play what the computer composed over night.
This is old hat. yawn. I knew this was coming when I was 2 years old.
( ;-) just for old times' sake.)
This week I will write a new composer that will write new versions
of lucy's dance (a mellow pentatonic countrapuntal thing)
in real time and play them.
I also thought up that musical turing test, but what it should do
is they both submit laser-printed scores to a contest. The computer
will when because composition competitions are such a scan. scam
. whatever.
Tom
|
2085.2 | | DFLAT::DICKSON | | Wed Aug 16 1989 12:19 | 4 |
| They weren't claiming artificial composition, but artifical
*creativity*. (See, it isn't *really* creative. It's, er, uh,
something else.) Maybe it is full of plagarized stuff from composers so
obscure that nobody has heard of them.
|
2085.3 | make your PC a super-star ... | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | ECADSR::SHERMAN 235-8176, 223-3326 | Wed Aug 16 1989 13:18 | 12 |
| Approximatly according to TAHD:
artificial == pretends
creative == original
Thus, artificial creativity is when a computer pretends to be original.
I know a few top names in the biz that have artificial creativity, and
with less memory and computing capacity in their heads than a Commodore
64. Only makes sense to put it into a computer. Now, if only they
could combine this with the, what is it, 2 k-bytes worth of top-40
formulas ...
Steve
|
2085.4 | Did I miss the drift? | LEDDEV::ROSS | shiver me timbres.... | Fri Aug 18 1989 11:25 | 9 |
|
Most top 40 is resplendant with Artificial Creativity.
Thus, we have a starting point.
:)
ron
|
2085.5 | .... | KALLON::EIRIKUR | Hallgr�msson, ACA and CDA Prod. Mgr. | Fri Aug 18 1989 11:51 | 10 |
| No, no, no! Top 40 is imitation artificial creativity. Real
artificial creativity would be better.
Just got the new David van Teigham CD. It is more consistent but less
good than his first. But I have to like a person who plays Fairlight,
lamp parts, scrap metal, plastic hose, and whatnot. Problem is, the
record company wanted an album. And he cranked something out. :-(
Eirikur
|
2085.6 | My program can beat up your program | GUESS::YERAZUNIS | Artificial Intellegence, Advanced Smoke and Mirrors Group | Fri Aug 18 1989 19:19 | 16 |
|
I've spent years wondering what the essence of creative thought
is (both as an amateur and a professional). My conclusion is that
I don't know _what_ it is, but I know some cheap parlor tricks that
tend to induce it.
Since I don't know what does (or does not) constitute creativity,
there really isn't any way for me to say whether a specific
[ floppy disk | musical score | person ] really and truly has
creativity.
-----
Anybody wanna try the Beethoven Turing Test?
-Bill
|
2085.7 | | SALSA::MOELLER | One mile wide. One inch deep. | Mon Aug 21 1989 13:35 | 8 |
| > < Note 2085.6 by GUESS::YERAZUNIS "Artificial Intellegence, Advanced Smoke and Mirrors Group" >
> -< My program can beat up your program >-
> Anybody wanna try the Beethoven Turing Test?
OK, Bill.. I'll bite. I know what Alan Turing's test is, but what
is a 'Beethoven' Turing test ?
karl
|
2085.8 | Isn't It Obvious? | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Mon Aug 21 1989 13:38 | 6 |
| It's whether or not the entity at the other end of the terminal connection
can convince you it's Beethoven. You know, by seeming to be deaf,
irritable, Viennese, going on endlessly about his nephew, etc..
len.
|