Title: | * * Computer Music, MIDI, and Related Topics * * |
Notice: | Conference has been write-locked. Use new version. |
Moderator: | DYPSS1::SCHAFER |
Created: | Thu Feb 20 1986 |
Last Modified: | Mon Aug 29 1994 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2852 |
Total number of notes: | 33157 |
Once again I need to ask all you folks for advice and/or comments, I have been looking for a module to add to my existing setup which is currently a Roland D-10, a Yamaha DX27 and a 360 Systems Midi Bass (the new one - rackmount etc.) My main wish list was pretty simple, better strings and piano's than I currently have and a wider selection of sounds in general. Then life got sequenced (opps, I mean complex!) I got hold of a used QX21 sequencer and now to my wish list was added multi-tim. capabilities. To the point....Yesterday I tried out a ROland S-220 sampler module, I was pretty impressed with the sound and the fact that it was Multi-tim. but what impressed me more was that Sam Ash is blowing them out a $499.99 This seemed like a great buy to my untrained eye. Problem: I really don't know much about this box and I need some input from you folks....Does that seem like a good deal.... is this a decent box?.....Support??....SOUND!!!!.. I realize that there are better,quicker, flashier etc boxes around, please try to review this in the context that this is an under $500 box.... Other Questions: 1) Can I sample my other keyboards into this and eliminate something from my stage set-up. Will they sound O.K.? 2) QUick Disks, are they reliable, can this unit be transported every weekend without having it in the shop every other? 3) Cost of disks, Sam Ash wants $49.99 for 10, this seems expensive...What do you folks think??? Thanks in advance for you patients and assistance, Gary ( I think I understand partials and structures, but this sampling stuff is new to me!) Ryan
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1997.1 | get a Proteus | SUBSYS::ORIN | Got a bad case of VFX | Thu May 18 1989 15:30 | 12 |
The S220 has not been a real popular box. One reason is the "Quick Disks", which are excessively expensive and store less information. I think that Roland regrets ever using that disk drive, as do many owners. It's a big caveat emptor when they dump equipment cheap. It usually means that it's either obsolete or unpopular, and they are having a clearance. The sound quality leaves a lot to be desired IMO. It really depends on your needs, budget, and how critical your ear is. If you want maximum quality for minimum bucks, I would highly recommend that you check out the EMU Proteus. It doesn't sample, and costs a little more, but you don't have to futz with expensive quick disks, and the sound is awesome. (See Proteus note) dave | |||||
1997.2 | DIR/TITL=MKS100 or DIR/TITL=S10 | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - back in Ohio. | Thu May 18 1989 16:41 | 5 |
There are several S10/MKS100 topics floating around here. Suggest you review them for product features. (Dan Eaton did a very nice review a while back, if I remember correctly.) -b | |||||
1997.3 | still searching | NYEM1::RYAN | Fri May 19 1989 11:35 | 7 | |
Thanks for the quick reply(s) your comments pretty much echo what I'm hearing locally form my Sampling friends..... Oh well, the search continues...... Gary R. |