T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1970.1 | Not THAT bad... | WEFXEM::COTE | The fool screams no more... | Fri Apr 21 1989 14:05 | 11 |
| When I was gigging I used an MVII that defaulted to one of the
chorus patches (#60). I left it on all the time. #66 was too
wild for my tastes...
I believe there are 10 different chorus in the MVII.
Since I scored my DEP-5, I only use the MVII for drums and leave
the chorusing to the Roland, which by the way, will do parralel
FX but is a bit outta your $ range...
Edd
|
1970.2 | | MARKER::BUCKLEY | I wish it was summertime all year! | Fri Apr 21 1989 14:14 | 11 |
| re. 0
If you liked the sound of the (analog) micro chorus, you could always
try and find a used version of the big-yellow-box MXR chorus...it
was a nice unit for what it did.
The DEP-5 does great chorus n reverb effects, but for the price,
a QR seems like the way to go. Last time I looked DEP-5's were
like in the $600. range.
I like the MVII for chorus myself....no quams with it.
|
1970.3 | DEP-5s discontinued? | NRADM::KARL | | Fri Apr 21 1989 14:30 | 12 |
| I've heard that DEP-5s are being discontinued (I forget where I
heard this). I've seen used ones going for around $350.00. This
may have something to do with the new Quadroverb competition(?))
I've had it about a year and haven't had the time to figure out
how to program it yet (I'm just using the presets and vary the
amount of reverb, etc.) I need a second one, and if the Quad will
do the same things with less programming hassle - I may spring for
one of those. But the price is still up there a little for even
a used DEP-5, depending on how much of a factor this is for you.
Bill
|
1970.4 | Boss RCE-10 | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Fri Apr 21 1989 15:14 | 28 |
| I personally don't like the chorus on the MV II although I suspect
that if you use it for MONO outputs (like most live guitar
applications) it's "decent". To my ears, it sounds way too
out of phase, and it doesn't do anything dramatic with stereo
Stereo chorus can be very dramatic and yet not too "altering".
That is, it's sorta like an Aural Exciter in that it can make
it sound a LOT better without making it sound a lot "different".
In my opinion, however, there is a clear winner in the realm
of choruses. It's the Boss RCE-10 which is a half-rack true
stereo chorus.
This is essentially the same chorus sound that made the JC-120
(Roland Jazz chorus amps) famous.
I don't have one, but I will eventually. I actually go out of the
way to borrow one from a friend when I need it.
I don't like to rave about products but I don't think anything else
comes close. I think the difference is because it's processed
in TRUE stereo. That is, for the most part, there are two sets of
everything in the signal chain (one for left, one for right).
Now, $150-$200 is a lot for a box that does only chorus, but I find chorus
so valuable that I think it's worth it (even if I can't afford it ;-).
db
|
1970.5 | Repair?? | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | If all else fails, take a nap... | Fri Apr 21 1989 15:19 | 5 |
|
Call me a wet blanket, but is it possible that the chorus that
you "smoked" has some kind of protection circuit (like a fuse, or
set of diodes) that could be replaced cheaply??
|
1970.6 | CE-3, CE-300, RCE-10 | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Fri Apr 21 1989 15:37 | 9 |
| I'll second db's nomination of the RCE-10 as well worth the extra bucks.
It is an update of the classic CE-300 rack mount chorus, two of
which I have hung on the outputs of my Super Jupiter. Talk about
*FAT* analog sound. If you're hard pressed for $ and still want that
Roland chorus sound, you can get a CE-3 stomp box for (I believe) less
than $100.
len.
|
1970.7 | Repair? Not likely. | RAD1::DAVIS | | Fri Apr 21 1989 16:54 | 11 |
| RE: .5
I actually would be happy to get it repaired (even though it is
a great excuse to spend some dollars I don't have 8^) ).
I'm not real optimistic though. I'll probably try to check it out once
more before I buy something new. But, I'm almost certain there's no
fuse (no room), and my electronic expertise is pretty limited (just
enough to be dangerous, as you can probably tell from my current
situation 8^( ). Thanks for the suggestion.
Rob
|
1970.8 | And the winner is ... | RAD1::DAVIS | | Tue Apr 25 1989 10:19 | 26 |
|
Just to follow up on my chorus search ...
I ended up buying a basic digital delay w/ modulation to get
chorus/flange type effects. I found a used Ibanez DD1000 Dual Delay at
Daddy's for $170, actually two separate delays in one small rackmount
box. They wanted $100 for the Boss CE-3 stomp box, so this seemed like
more processing power for my money. One delay has a short delay range
and mod for chorus/flange and the other is a one second straight delay
for echo effects. I can take the output of the echo delay and patch it
into the chorus/flange side. Fits my style of guitar playing to a "T".
An interesting side note for others trying to create chorus effects...
The "mod"ed delay has 3 separate outs for the straight sound, "MIX"ed
w/ delay signal, and something marked "INV DEL" (out-of-phase delay?).
Now I've never really played with a stereo chorus, but I started
trying different combinations of these outs panned to opposite sides,
and the sound was really a revelation. Best combo that I found was
with the straight signal panned slightly to one side, and a fairly
heavy "MIX" panned a bit more to the other side. The "INV DEL" with
the "MIX" signal was not quite as dramatic. It gave a nice stereo
image, but actually seemed to deaden the chorus effect.
Rob
|
1970.9 | Yep | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Tue Apr 25 1989 14:19 | 12 |
| > w/ delay signal, and something marked "INV DEL" (out-of-phase delay?).
Yep: out-of-phase.
> The "INV DEL" with the "MIX" signal was not quite as dramatic.
Yep, and I'm pretty sure that's what the MIDIverb II does for
it's chorus which is why I've been so negative about the MV II
chorus effect.
db
|
1970.10 | give me a TM320 DSP and we talk 'real' | LEDDEV::ROSS | shiver me timbres.... | Mon May 01 1989 14:42 | 13 |
|
wellllllllll, if ya check the equations or S. O. P. for
implimentations of chorus vs. flanging for signal mix,
you find that this is 'correct'.
The issue of deriving "stereo" (actually pseudo-stereo)
signals to drive TWO CHANNELS is something else you're
alluding to, which is usually a function of $COST$.
boom,chakalakalaka....
rr
|
1970.11 | "Conventional" Chorus? | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Mon May 01 1989 17:08 | 9 |
| I don't know where to "check" for S.O.P. for chorusing and flanging,
I didn't know there were rules written anywhere.
But I will only tell you this:
The Roland/Boss units produce a much nicer "chorus-like"
effect than anything else I've heard.
db
|
1970.12 | Boss CE-300 Price? | RICKS::NORCROSS | | Mon Jul 30 1990 14:05 | 3 |
| Is $99 a good price for a Boss CE-300? (single space full-rack mount).
/Mitch
|
1970.13 | Probably not a good used price | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | This is your brain on Unix | Mon Jul 30 1990 14:41 | 7 |
| New or used?
Don't know if that's a good price, but I paid $99 for my RCE (single
space, but half-width) chorus brand new - the RCE seems to have been
the replacement for the CE-300. I'm told they sound the same.
db
|
1970.14 | A Chorus Line? | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | len, EMA, LKG2-2/W10, DTN 226-7556 | Tue Jul 31 1990 15:32 | 13 |
| Yes, it's a good used price. I'd grab it if it was in good condition.
I have 3 CE-300's (and 2 RCE-10's), and while the RCE-10 is a great
chorus the CE-300 is a supergreat chorus. BTW, $99 for a new RCE-10
is incredible - they went for about $250 list. Both the CE-300 and the
RCE-10 have become very hard to find. Mine are all dedicated to the
(sometimes stereo) outputs of my preintegrated-effects analog synths;
in case you're wondering how I can possibly justify such wretched
excess, all you have to do is listen. Can you say fat, Fat, FAT,
*FAT*?
len.
|
1970.15 | Echoing Len's comments | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | This is your brain on Unix | Wed Aug 01 1990 10:04 | 20 |
| I feel compelled to echo Len's comments.
I think that the chorus design that seems to be common to both the
RCE and the CE-300 is just one of those rare incredible products.
I was ready to buy as many RCE's as they would sell me for $99.
Unfortunately they only had one.
I run quite a bit of stuff through the chorus (most synths sounds,
crash and rides, a little bit of acoustic guitar, etc.) That is,
I almost use it like one might use an Aural Exciter.
One caveat though. It isn't NEARLY as good if you only run it in
Mono. I think the whole point of these particular chorus units as
that they offer a DRAMATIC stereo psycho-acoustic effect. As mono
chorus units, they are perhaps noticeably better than anything else,
but not likely to induce the raves you hear when they are run in true
stereo.
db
|
1970.16 | can they be ordered? | PNO::HEISER | news: 70 shopping days til no PNO | Fri Jan 18 1991 12:55 | 3 |
| does anyone know if the CE300 or RCE are out of production?
Mike
|
1970.17 | Long gone, but common used. New stuff is more featureful, MIDI controlled, etc. | RANGER::EIRIKUR | Eir�kur Hallgr�msson | Fri Jan 18 1991 19:38 | 5 |
| I think these are long gone. I got some of the last RCE-10's on sale over a
year ago.
Eir�kur
|
1970.18 | search for the ultimate chorus ;-) | UPWARD::HEISER | news: 70 shopping days til no PNO | Fri Jan 18 1991 22:52 | 4 |
| Do they have a successor with similar circuitry? If not, who out there
has a unit of equal quality?
Mike
|
1970.19 | Victims of Digital Multieffects | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | len, EMA, LKG2-2/W10, DTN 226-7556 | Tue Jan 22 1991 10:01 | 44 |
| re .18 et al. - No successor that I am aware of. There's a chorus in
their continuing string of multieffects boxes, but I doubt these use
the same technology. The CE-300 and RCE-10 use analog and digital
approaches, respectively, so they are actually different technologies
from one another, but the results seem to have been equally good.
I have no details. The only dedicated chorus unit I know of that seems
to be in the same league as these is the TC Electronics unit, but I have
heard TC Electronics comes and goes as a business entoty, and the unit
(like the CE-300 and RCE-10) is a bit pricey (around $300?).
For the record, summary of the CE-300 and RCE-10:
CE-300: one rack height, full width
effect on/off switch
input level pot
5 segment signal level led (green, green, yellow, red, red)
(-20db -10db 0db +3db +6db)
modulation rate and depth pots
direct mute on/off switch (i.e., can have effect only output)
chorus tone and level pots
power on/off
1/4" front and rear inputs and dual outputs (A/A+B, B)
1/4" rear remote effect on/off switch jack
AC line powered
RCE-10: one rack height, half width
effect on/off switch
predelay time pot
modulation rate and depth pots
effect EQ and level pots
power on/off switch
1/4" and RCA rear inputs and dual outputs (A/mono, B)
1/4" rear remote effect on/off switch
rear -10dbm/-20dbm "unigain" switch
My impression of the principal virtues of these choruses - their
quietness and subtlety. They can be cranked up to provide egregious
if not outrageously bizarre effects, but used discreetly they warrant
the highest complement you can pay to an effect - you don't notice it
until you turn it off, and then suddenly the sound's just not right.
len.
|
1970.20 | | GLOWS::COCCOLI | monitoring reality | Tue Jan 22 1991 16:21 | 6 |
|
Try Rogue Music. Last time there (2 weeks ago) they had the RCE.
Rich Coccoli
|