T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1828.1 | There! I said it three times in the same note! | NRPUR::DEATON | | Mon Dec 26 1988 11:09 | 8 |
| RE < Note 1828.0 by SOS6::RAMA >
I've gotten some of the best organ patches out of FM synthesis. I have
a Yamaha TX81Z and a Yamaha DX100, both of which use 4 operator, 8 algorythm
FM synthesis. I'd imagine a Yamaha DX7 or its brethren would do even better.
Dan
|
1828.2 | Big sounds- little box. | CSG::ROACH | | Mon Dec 26 1988 11:15 | 4 |
| There are a few hundred public domain organ sounds available for DX7's. Lots
of pipe sounds and such. It could be worth a try.
Geoff
|
1828.3 | MicroVerb + anything | MIDEVL::YERAZUNIS | I don't smoke !! That was the flamethrower !! | Mon Dec 26 1988 19:30 | 19 |
| I personally prefer the classical organs made by oscillator/filter
type synths (i.e. Oberheim, Ensoniq). Cranking up the resonance
in the filter and cranking down the number of poles really pulls
in that "Cathedral Rumble" that's missing from the FM synths.
This isn't to say that DX organ sounds are bad- they are actually
quite decent and usable. They just aren't quite as hard-core
cathedral organy.
-----
All bets are off if you use any outboard signal processing... even
a Casio SK-1 organ sounds pretty darn good if you run it through
a MicroVerb set on Huge Room. :-)
Yeah, that's the ticket. Get ANY synth and a MicroVerb. Epoxy
the knob on the MicroVerb to "huge room" and then Velcro it to the
back of the synth. It'll sound great and no one will notice the
little box.
|
1828.4 | Gee, I played Bach on my Farfisa.... | DDIF::EIRIKUR | Hallgr�msson, CDA Product Manager | Tue Dec 27 1988 00:20 | 19 |
| Organs are a really fun thing to synthesize. With any decent
synthesizer you can come up with entirely different types of pipe and
reed sounds. A DX or even a CZ (with a real keyboard) a chorus box
(maybe internal to the synth) and the aforementioned Microverb will
knock the socks off of any organ a single human being can afford.
Even if you are a novice, you will find modifying and creating organ
sounds to be among the easiest tasks on any synth.
Buy more synthesizer than you know that you need though. There's
nothing worse than running out of resources: "Damn, if I could only
clone this rank and detune it...." Stay away from home-type keyboards
where you pay for the beat-box and the built-in speakers. Most of
those units are inflexible and lack the basic sound quality
(frequency response) that makes for a satisfying organ.
Eirikur, the closet organ freak.
(Now if only I could find a MIDI retrofit for a Farfisa...)
|
1828.5 | Considered a sampler? | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Yo! | Tue Dec 27 1988 09:35 | 12 |
| I've got about a dozen pipe organ sounds for my ESQ-1.
They all sound really good, however I'd give some serious thought
to buying a sampler if all you are interested in is realistic
organ sounds. I have some really great pipe organ samples for
my Roland sampler that are MUCH MUCH better than any synthetic
approximation I've heard.
You can get a Roland sampler for as little as $800 these days which
might well be less than any of the synths that have been mentioned.
db
|
1828.6 | A sampler is a really good fit for this.... | DDIF::EIRIKUR | Hallgr�msson, CDA Product Manager | Wed Dec 28 1988 01:03 | 5 |
| Re .5: I take it all back, db is right. I always did lust after the
Royal Festival Hall organ. And I can afford a sampler.....
Eirikur
|
1828.7 | The best K5 sounds are the pipe organs. | BOLT::BAILEY | Constants aren't. Variables don't. | Wed Dec 28 1988 08:37 | 14 |
| I have all those DX7 patches, but the Kawai K5 has pipe organ patches
which blow them away. You should give it a listen. Note however,
that most of the good pipe patches are hidden in the depths of their
sound library (that is, not on the two banks that are shipped with
the instrument).
What really puts the K5 over the top, for organ simulation, is the ease
with which you may create different combinations of the sounds and
switch between them in real time, using the ``multi'' feature. This
allows nice, arbitrary (well, almost) stop changes which can be managed
by the player.
Steph
|
1828.8 | i like D50 | NORGE::CHAD | Ich glaube Ich t�te Ich h�tte | Wed Dec 28 1988 13:09 | 6 |
|
When I was looking around, the thing that impressed me the most was the
Cathedral Organ patch opn the D50. Also on card 3 or 4 by Roland is good
sound.
Chad
|
1828.9 | Mirage pipes are pretty full... | SYNTH::SEIGEL | | Thu Dec 29 1988 12:28 | 12 |
| Of all of the Mirage disks I've heard, the factory pipe organ disk is
one of the best. And, of the pipe-organ sounds I've heard from other
machines, it's still one of the best. For an 'n rank pipe-organ, that
is. The DOUBLE mode pipe organ on the OB8 was always great, but alas,
only 4 notes.
So, I guess the pernt is that samplers are definitely very high in the
running...
My 2�...
andy
|
1828.10 | You want the "Real McCoy"? | MUSKIE::ALLEN | | Thu Dec 29 1988 14:44 | 27 |
| Francis:
I too come from a classical organ background, having been a
church organist and been a choirboy in a cathedral for four years.
If that is the sound you are after, I hate to pop your bubble, but
no synth is going to give you that. As Steve mentioned in .7, the
KAWAI K5 has some good organ sounds and it is fairly easy to get
to them, but you will need reverb (and lots of it). The ROLAND
D110 also has a couple decent patches, but again they need help.
I have never heard anything else that didn't sound "electric", which
is OK if you are trying to get a HAMMOND organ sound.
db makes an excellent point in .5 about considering a sampler.
If you really want a realistic pipe organ sound you will have to
go this route. I have heard the Mirage sounds mentioned in .9 and
they are impressive. I thought I was listening to a pipe organ
and that was without any reverb! Give a listen to all of the above
and judge for yourself. You are going to have to make some compri-
mises, but given what else you get get from a good synth, its worth
it. Keep in mind that if your synth has a flexible enough architec-
ture you will be able to "build" your own stops from scratch, and
then combine these just as you would in a real organ. To do this,
you may want to find synths with realistic flute, reed, and brass
sounds. Again, the K5 and/or D110 might be good places to start.
(I can vouch for these two because I own them :-) )
Santa Clusters,
Bill Allen @MPO
|
1828.11 | Uh, some whys, and maybe a how or two | DDIF::EIRIKUR | Hallgr�msson, CDA Product Manager | Sat Dec 31 1988 02:01 | 22 |
| Just a quick comment on why many of us all seem to think that our
favorite (mumble) synth architecture does good organ sounds: Most
sythesizer architectures are reasonably good at creating static spectra
(timbres) but fall down in terms of dynamicly changing spectra. On an
organ there is no velocity (or are you going to hurt me and bring up
trackers) and the only real event during a note is the chiff before the
pipe settles down into its major mode. Most synths can make almost any
static timbre; add reverb and you've got a decent organ. You have to
get the chiff right, and some detuning for those of us who have heard
the real thing, but that's about all.
This bit about the dynamic changes being the hard part is why more
operators=better in the DX (Y-something?) world, and more modulation
options (and more modulators) is better in the classic
occilators/filters world.
Pedantic tonight. Hmmm.
Eirikur
(Gee, my static wavetable machine makes a pretty good
organ...)
|
1828.12 | speakin' of organs ... | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | Love is a decision ... | Mon Jan 02 1989 21:06 | 4 |
| Actually, I've used my lowly CZ-101 for organ parts. I actually
like it ...
Steve
|
1828.13 | | ALEX::CONN | Alex Conn, ZKO | Mon Jan 09 1989 21:34 | 7 |
| Re: .8
Yup. #38 on the D50 is so far the best I have heard. I could have played
that for hours without getting tired. Of course you need a good dozen other
patches for other common organ stops.
Alex
|