T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1826.1 | DS8, no. DX11, yes! | NRPUR::DEATON | | Thu Dec 22 1988 10:27 | 9 |
| RE < Note 1826.0 by BPOV04::M_CLEMENT >
I'd say if you're going to go with FM synthesis, buy from the people
that do it best. Get a Yamaha DX11 and you'll get all the sounds of the DS8
plus a lot more functionality. The only thing you'll miss is the internal
digital delay.
Dan
|
1826.2 | | BPOV04::M_CLEMENT | | Thu Dec 22 1988 13:47 | 8 |
| re. 1
thanks for responding...
What are the alternatives to FM synthesis, and what does it mean
in regards to sound and price?
Mark
|
1826.3 | Yowzuh! | NRPUR::DEATON | | Thu Dec 22 1988 15:16 | 32 |
| RE < Note 1826.2 by BPOV04::M_CLEMENT >
> What are the alternatives to FM synthesis, and what does it mean
> in regards to sound and price?
Now, that's a loaded question (of the magnitude of asking "What other
cars are there?" after having viewed only one manufacturer's)!
Let's see if I can put together a decent list (other's help me out...)
FM Synthesis (4 Operator/8 algorythm)
FM Synthesis (6 Operator/32 algorythm)
Analog Synthesis (subtractive)
Analog Synthesis (additive)
Wave-table synthesis
Phase distortion Synthesis
Sampling
Linear Addaptive Synthesis
Structured Adaptive Synthesis
Gosh, I can't think of any more...
But you get the idea. You can get something in almost any of these
styles of synthesis in a wide range of prices. You really have to hear them to
know if they are close to what you want out of a synth.
Another approach you could make would be to give a general price range
and we could let you know what was available in the varying types of synthesis
in that range.
Dan
|
1826.4 | The "Big 3" | CTHULU::YERAZUNIS | Iconoclasm as a way of life... | Thu Dec 22 1988 17:36 | 45 |
| Don't forget
Granular Synthesis
Fourier Synthesis (kind of like additive crossed with sampling)
.
.
.
The BIG families are:
FM/Phase synthesis - using the instantaneous amplitude of one wave to
change the instantaneous frequency or phase of another wave.
Usually both waves are sine waves.
o Makes good percussive sounds (bells)
o Makes OK strings
o Makes lousy winds
o Programming can be difficult unless you like
Bessel functions (which I do like).
Analog synthesis - An oscillator generates a wave. Filters are
then used to shape the wave. Often there are more than 1 oscillator;
sometimes there are 3 or 4.
o Makes good winds
o Makes great strings
o Makes lousy percussive sounds
o Programming can be simple or complex depending on
the instrument (compare a Micro-Moog versus a Matrix-12).
Sampling - a digital representation of a wave is "read out" by the
keyboard rapidly. The readout may be (optionally) filtered
by analog filters. The digital representation may (optionally)
be "spliced" or "looped" as if it were a snippet of magnetic
tape in a studio cutting room.
o Can duplicate any sound you can tape-record
(dogs barking, birds singing, trash cans clanging,
Stradivarius violins playing, etc ), and at different
pitches.
o Doesn't really let you create a lot of new sounds
from scratch, just modify sounds you already have
(sometimes beyond human recognizability !)
|
1826.5 | Synth-Tech 101 | BPOV04::M_CLEMENT | | Wed Dec 28 1988 15:41 | 27 |
| Oh man,,,
I think I need an engineering degree to understand all this stuff.
Well I bought a Korg DW-8000 last Friday. It is a Digital Wave
Form Synth.
I really like the pre-set sounds available off of the tape.
Great Hammond Organ & Cathedral Organ sound.
Great Piano options.
Great Clavinette.
Great Slap Bass.
Anyhow I have only yet touched the surface of what can be done with
this synth. You can variate all of the pre-set sounds, and create/
program your own sounds. Load & save to/from tape.
I am having some fun with the effects sounds.
I should learn more about the technology. But my main concerns
are the ability to have a versatile keyboard for jamming with
other musicians. So the basic keyboard sounds I am very happy with.
Thanks for the info.
Mark.
|