Title: | * * Computer Music, MIDI, and Related Topics * * |
Notice: | Conference has been write-locked. Use new version. |
Moderator: | DYPSS1::SCHAFER |
Created: | Thu Feb 20 1986 |
Last Modified: | Mon Aug 29 1994 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2852 |
Total number of notes: | 33157 |
Just recieved the Nov 88 edition of Afterbirth (y-word rag). 3 "new" repackaged version of my beloved TX81Z. Get this..with "user friendly interfaces" And I quote "To make FM digital synthesis easier to work with, Yamaha has unveiled a new family of affordable digital synthesizers. Although all three have 4-operator, 8-algorithm, 8-waveform FM technology, they discard the complicated terminology long associated with FM digital sound creation, and replace it with variables that are easy for all musicians to understand." YS200...full size, 5 octave, touch sensitive w/aftertouch. stereo outputs volume, sus pedals headphone jack and breath controller inputs 100 voices in ROM..100 in RAM..100 in RAM cart BUILT IN 8 TRACK SEQUENCER with storage to RAM cart suggested retail $1395.00 YS100...same thing without sequencer and aftertouch (why sell it?) suggested retail is $1195.00 B200...same as YS200 but with self-contained three way stereo amp and speaker system. (hi-tech boom box?) suggested retail is $1495.00 nuff said...go buy a TX81Z and a used MC500 for the same price! Rich C.
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1806.1 | ugly too. | NORGE::CHAD | Ich glaube Ich t�te Ich h�tte | Sat Dec 10 1988 13:22 | 8 |
And they are darn ugly IMHO. Daddy's in Nashua has the YS200 and the B200. They've had them since end of October. These look very unappealing aesthetically, I mean real ugly. And the price is ridiculous. Chad | |||||
1806.2 | Reverb city.... | DDIF::EIRIKUR | Hallgr�msson, CDA Product Manager | Sat Dec 10 1988 18:29 | 12 |
re 1.: Ugly is in the mind of the beholder. I played these things at Daddy's. Y. has learned from the sales lost to D-50's; these instruments all come with a built-in reverb that is used on all the presets. I don't think they are exactly pretty, but I really approve of the fact that they are different, and they make some attempt at a usable interface. When I was at Daddy's, a Y-word rep. mentioned that the VS200 would be advertized on MTV. The packaging really does look as if it were designed for the all-style/no substance crowd. At least they have full-sized keys. Eirikur | |||||
1806.3 | For you MTV fans ... | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | Love is a decision ... | Mon Dec 12 1988 09:54 | 3 |
I want my ... I want my ... I want my old TZ ... Steve | |||||
1806.4 | Time For A Look | AQUA::ROST | Chickens don't take the day off | Wed Sep 13 1989 20:56 | 10 |
Considering the Sam Ash blow-out prices, how programmable are these beasts? A brand new YS-200 at under $500 could be worthwhile if it's close enough to a DX-11 in functionality. Anybody checked out a MIDI implementation chart on one of these? Maybe it's time to take more than just a glance at these ugly boxes.... Brian Looking_for_cheap_aftertouch | |||||
1806.5 | KALLON::EIRIKUR | Hallgr�msson, ACA and CDA Prod. Mgr. | Thu Sep 14 1989 11:24 | 14 | |
<<< Note 1806.4 by AQUA::ROST "Chickens don't take the day off" >>> -< Time For A Look >- I played these and talked to the Y-word rep. at the introduction at Daddy's in Nashua. They are essentially a TX81Z and a (REX-50?) effects unit in one box with the keyboard. I think that the -100 does not have aftertouch. It would be a good idea to make sure the MIDI stuff wasn't messed-up for these packages, though. Eirikur | |||||
1806.6 | HAMER::COCCOLI | Thu Sep 14 1989 19:04 | 4 | ||
U sure the YS-200 has aftertouch?.........Rich | |||||
1806.7 | learning.... improving.... | NWD002::EVANS_BR | Thu Sep 14 1989 19:43 | 8 | |
re: 1806.5, KALLON::EIRIKUR, ...good idea to make sure the MIDI stuff wasn't messed-up...... I have a DX-11 (which has aftertouch), and am curious (being new to all this) what you meant by "messed up" -- or perhaps another way to say this... what do I want to look for in my "next" MIDI box so I do not repeat any inadvertant mistakes found in this one.... Thanks! | |||||
1806.8 | "messed-up" = missing for cost or other reasons | DDIF::EIRIKUR | Hallgr�msson, ACA and CDA Prod. Mgr. | Fri Sep 15 1989 00:15 | 10 |
What I meant about the MIDI implementation in these home-oriented, non professional keyboards being sometimes "messed-up" (took time to choose those words, too!) was that sometimes the MIDI features are reduced or eliminated for cost reasons or perhaps even marketing reasons. The DX-11 is a pro-market unit and I would expect it to have a full TX81Z MIDI implementation. I am not at all certain that you get that full set of MIDI features in one of these YS?00 keyboards. Eirikur | |||||
1806.9 | YS100 no, YS200 yes. | NRPUR::DEATON | Fri Sep 15 1989 10:58 | 9 | |
RE < Note 1806.6 by HAMER::COCCOLI > > U sure the YS-200 has aftertouch?.........Rich Yes, it does. (I have a flyer on the two YS instruments here in my files). Dan | |||||
1806.10 | HAMER::COCCOLI | Fri Sep 15 1989 19:24 | 17 | ||
I just got back from putting a YS-200 through inspection at Sam Ash with cash in pocket. The cash is still in pocket. I was pretty dissapointed. 1) Cards are NOT AVAILABLE.....at least not at any Sam Ash outlet 2) Can't save multi-timbral setups EXCEPT to card. 3) Cheesy feeling keyboard. 4) It's got effects, but it ain't even a REX-50. Midi implementation is pretty thorough. Less harse FM sound from the presets, and the UI is very friendly. Creating a sound is a matter of four or five parameters. I think I'll keep my TX81Z a while.............Rich | |||||
1806.11 | YS200 Review - A good deal (for my needs, anyway)! | NRPUR::DEATON | Mon Dec 11 1989 12:56 | 94 | |
Well, I just got my new YS200 from Sam Ash last Friday night to replace the DX100. I have a few comments on it to share, some based on comments here, some from my own observation/research. It was mentioned in the base note that it would be just as well to go and buy a TX81Z and an MC500. Well, you actually get quite a lot more than that, and quite a bit less at the same time. Regarding the YS200's internal sound module, it is *almost* a TX81Z. It is nearly identical in its sound-building structure and patches can go back and forth to and from it and a TZ without any change in sound quality. The only thing that is curiously missing from the YS's internal voicing is that it doesn't use portamento. You can actually STORE that you want "Full Time Portamento" or "Fingered Portamento", but it will not store or understand any value for "Portamento Time", thus always using the fastest portamento rate (in other words, no portamento). One thing I will also miss from my DX100 is the ability to choose how it will respond to pitch bend (i.e., only lowest note bends, only highest note bends, all notes bend). But looking in my TZ manual, I don't see that it had that feature either (I'd love to hear someone tell me otherwise, though). What you *do* get, though, is a digital effects processor. It is fairly similar to an REX50 with some subtractions. It has three kinds of reverb (hall, room and gated), each with adjustable time and balance, some digital delays (one slap-back type, one panning type and another normal type), again, each with adjustable time and balance. Finally, you have a distortion with reverb and distortion with delay settings. The distortion cannot be altered, and the controls only change the room size or delay rate, but its nice having that there on a synth. There are no "pitch shifting" or modulated delays (like chorus/flange) settings, though. While you can set up a "multi-voice" setting, as one might suspect on an instrument at this price range, you still only get one effect to cover all (up to) eight voices. You can set this globally, but it will be applied equally to all voices (based on the balance parameter). It would have been nice to have each voice retain its programmed effect, but I'm sure the cost would have just shot right up with that option. Its internal sequencer will hold 10,000 events. In the real world, of course, using velocity and aftertouch, etc., that number goes down rapidly. Still, it might prove a nice scetch-pad when you don't want to carry the whole system along. It uses eight tracks and has the basic edit funtions. I haven't delved much into them yet. It appears that the closest thing to event editing you get is the ability to erase a single note. But it will only go down to 32nd note intervals for the erase note function, so if you're playing any faster than that (hah! - with my chops?), all notes within that 32nd note range will go at the same time. No problem - that's what I have my MC500 for. Like every other Pro keyboard I've seen from Yamaha, they give you absolute control over everything via sysex (I wish Roland would learn from this!). You can send SysEx to have it do anything, right down to pushing a button! That is one of the main reasons I prefer Yamaha keyboards as my synth keyboard controller (I use two, one "piano-type" - my Roland RD200 - which I like for its light piano action, and one for all synth sounds). You get 100 preset voices and 100 internal RAM voices. A RAM card adds another 100 or can be used to store one (count it - one) sequence. I probably won't use the cards because for the price (Sam Ash wants $60 each), you don't get a lot of bang. That's what computors and data cassettes are for (the YS does not store to cassette, but will transmit across midi all its internal memory). The Multi-Mode settings (you only get one) *may* be saved across power cycles, but I haven't confirmed it yet. Since I've already begun setting these up via system exclusives, I'm not concerned. The sounds that come with it are quite good! Whatever 4-op synthesis may lack in fullness gets fixed by digital effects. A little "Hall Reverb" goes a long way here. While there are some factory patch dogs (as always), there are quite a few patches in here that do things I've never heard FM synthesis do (or do well). I'd say there could be as high as 50% usability in the factory presets (and from all the sounds I've heard, that's pretty good). This is the first time I've heard a real good FM string patch that gives analog a run for the money. And not since I owned a sampler have I heard a decent "Applause" patch, but this one comes *real* close. The keyboard feel is just right for my needs - a synth type light feel. Aftertouch does not need a heavy push. This is my first time really delving into aftertouch and I like the way it responds. Most Roland keyboards I've tried using aftertouch with (JX8P, Alpha Juno 2, MKB-200) were far too difficult to use. The keys have just a little resistance, enough to feel right for me. The physical design of the keyboard (one noter thought it was ugly) is not quite Pro-oriented, but its not really consumer-looking either. I don't have a problem with it, in any case. All in all, the YS200 is a trade-off. It is exactly what I was looking for - a full-size keyboard with velocity, aftertouch, PB, MW and breath controller - and it has some pleasant extras - like eight-voice multi-timbral, built-in digital effects and sequencer. The trade-off, though, is that all these extras don't work best being used at the same time (i.e., you don't get the full advantage of the digital effects while in multi-timbral-mode), but extras are just that, extra. Dan | |||||
1806.12 | WEFXEM::COTE | Call *who* Ishmael??? | Mon Dec 11 1989 13:08 | 10 | |
Sorry, the TZ doesn't support those absolutely wunnaful alternative PB schemes... would that they did!!! How much be this beast??? Can you post a list of the presets??? Can I come up and copy them all?? ;^) Edd | |||||
1806.13 | NRPUR::DEATON | Mon Dec 11 1989 13:24 | 18 | ||
RE < Note 1806.12 by WEFXEM::COTE "Call *who* Ishmael???" > Yeah, I kinda suspected it didn't. I couldn't find it in the SysEx listing in the back of the manual. Sam Ash is selling the YS200 for $429. Only about a grand below list. Regarding presets, I'm willing to write out the preset names (all 100 of them?!?) but in many cases I don't know how useful or descriptive the names are (do you know what "Swirlies" sounds like?). It would take some time for me to write them out and provide any basic descriptions. Stay tuned. I'd be glad to make them available for Sysex dump, though. Call whenever you want to come get 'em. (I wonder if they'll sound o.k. without the internal digital effects?) Dan | |||||
1806.14 | one more thang... | NRPUR::DEATON | Mon Dec 11 1989 13:40 | 10 | |
Just thought of this... The TZ -> YS200 comparison has one other breakdown. While the YS does have a performance mode similar to the TZ, it is somewhat shaved down. It doesn't have things like the three MIDI effects (pan, delay, single note chord), nor does it have a micro-tuning table. I have never used these so it is a moot point for me. Dan | |||||
1806.15 | YS200's delay a bit of a surprise | NRPUR::DEATON | Wed Jan 10 1990 10:59 | 16 | |
I discovered something else about my YS200 in terms of onboard FX... You have the option to add digital reverb, delay, distortion and delay, etc. Well, the delays are not signal processing delays (like you'd have with an add-on box on the synth's output). Rather, it is a MIDI delay that steals voices from the synth (actually, its the same as what you get on a TX81Z's effect section - except that it won't transpose the delay to intervals like the TZ will). I'm not bothered by it at this point because I doubt this, uh, feature will haunt me in terms of how I'm using this synth (for that matter, I kind of doubt I'd ever even USE a delay). But it strikes me as interesting how Yamaha implemented it without letting on the hidden "cost" (of a voice or two). Dan | |||||
1806.16 | You were all dying to know this, right? | NRPUR::DEATON | In tents | Tue Feb 06 1990 09:45 | 8 |
RE YS200's delay effects... Slight correction to be made here. I found that only the "slap-back" type delays are voice-stealing. They also have signal-processed delays that are in the audio (as opposed to MIDI) signal path. Dan | |||||
1806.17 | No, I Wanted To Know THIS | AQUA::ROST | Everyone loves those dead presidents | Tue Feb 06 1990 12:59 | 2 |
So why don't they do the slapbacks with the audio processor, then? | |||||
1806.18 | cause it's busy doing the dIsTorTion. Right Dan?. | GLOWS::COCCOLI | Thela Hun Gingeet | Tue Feb 06 1990 17:32 | 1 |