T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1753.1 | | CANYON::MOELLER | Is 'neotraditional' a word ? | Tue Nov 01 1988 11:42 | 12 |
| Hi Ken.. Karl here. I use an ancient 512K Mac with 2 400K flops..
My MIDI interface is from OPCODE. It has a MIDI in and OUT, clock/
poll speed switch selectable .5/1/2MHz. It screws onto eithere
the modem (my choice) or printer port. I run Performer software
from Mark of the Unicorn. I read a Jan Hammer interview.. he's
a big Texture fan, but is also using Macs, and he really beat up
the Mac MIDI software folks for not using the 'chain a song together'
model that he uses so much with Texture. So you may not find the
features you require in the software available on the Mac.
Southworth and Opcode both make Mac MIDI interfaces.. dunno about
the Mac II though.
|
1753.2 | FYI | WRO8A::CORTOPADA | | Tue Nov 01 1988 11:56 | 8 |
| I just upgraded to a Mac+ w/800k drives. Have Performer by Mark
of the Unicorn, and still waiting for an Opcode 'Studio Plus 2'
interface.
The only bit of info I can offer is that I noticed in the Performer
documentation that a few of the Performer functions don't work with
a Mac II. In my opinion, those missing functions are highly
desireable. dc
|
1753.3 | Still thinking | TRCA03::HITCHMOUGH | | Wed Nov 02 1988 13:15 | 15 |
| Thanks for the info. I think I may go with a simple Passport interface
to start with. The sequencing s/w is another subject. I've narrowed
it down to two choices (not scientifically) -Master tracks pro and
Performer. I understand they've fixed the problems with Performer
for the Mac II. The problem is that it's hard to decide without
using it for a week and finding out whether it appeals to the
appropriate side of your brain. I tend to be a music hacker that
throws small ideas down and eventually gets around to expanding on
one, so the Texture approach was good for me. However I can see
how the Master tracks graphical editing would be really nice, but
how do you know until you've tried it. With the price of s/w as
it is up here (about 450 to 550 Can with tax) it could be an expensive
mistake...any comments?
Ken
|
1753.4 | Happy MTP user | TALLIS::HERDEG | Mark Herdeg, LTN1-2/B17 226-6520 | Wed Nov 02 1988 13:34 | 12 |
|
I'm an occasional user of Master Tracks Pro on my Mac Plus. I have a
simple 1-in 1-out Passport interface, which is fine since my only MIDI
device is my Kurzweil K1000. I am happy with it. I like the graphical
interface, but at some point I'd like to get some scoring software that
it will work with.
I paid about $210 (US) for Master Tracks Pro by mail order. There is
also a Master Tracks Jr. with most of the features that sells for around
$100.
-Mark
|
1753.5 | YAHMTPU (yet another happy master tracks pro user) | HPSRAD::NORCROSS | | Wed Nov 02 1988 13:50 | 27 |
| > < Note 1753.3 by TRCA03::HITCHMOUGH >
> I've narrowed
> it down to two choices (not scientifically) -Master tracks pro and
Get Master Tracks Pro. I've been using it happily on a Mac SE for 1.25
years now. I recently did a side by side demo of it against
Performer and all three of us agreed that if you're going to do any
editing of songs, MTP is the better one. The only real drawback we
noted was that MTP doesn't record/send sysex data in real time with
a sequence (it has a non-real time sysex librarian though). MTP
version 3.0 goes for $300 (US) mail order. MTP version 3.0 offers
32 MIDI channels. For a more complete review see the MTP note in
this conference (do a DIR/TITLE=MASTER).
> I tend to be a music hacker that
> throws small ideas down and eventually gets around to expanding on
> one, so the Texture approach was good for me. However I can see
> how the Master tracks graphical editing would be really nice, but
The graphical MTP approach is a superset of the Texture approach.
Basically, if you have several parts of a song that you want to
arrange into a complete song, you whip out the mouse and draw (cut
and paste) it on the screen. You can also cut and paste between
files.
/Mitch
|
1753.6 | Go 4 MTP. | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - back in Ohio. | Wed Nov 02 1988 14:58 | 10 |
| Although I own an Atari ST, I second the vote for MTP. Great U/I.
Only drawback (which may or may not be important to you - it wasn't to
me) is the lack of on-creen notation and transcription capabilities.
But Passport offers a package for the Mac that scores MTP files.
FWIW - Passport also has a new MIDI/sync box out for the Mac (or at
least it's in the works).
-b
|
1753.7 | MTP 4, Perf 1 | TRCA03::HITCHMOUGH | | Fri Nov 04 1988 08:32 | 10 |
| Seems like MTP has the edge based on your feedback. I dont need
the scoring and I do like the U.I. that I've seen. I believe the
problem with performer was something to do with the timing chip
on the MAC II and this has been solved in version 3.0
I've been able to convince my local music store to let me borrow
both for evaluation so I'll be able to compare side by side in my
own environment. Thanks for the help and I'll report back with the
results.
Ken
|
1753.8 | Decision made. | TRCA03::HITCHMOUGH | | Tue Nov 22 1988 08:32 | 33 |
| Well, thanks to all those who gave advice. I tried Performer and
was VERY impressed with the technicallity of the s/w. All those
buttons that look like they're being depressed when you click on
them are really usefull!! I just wish they'd spent as much time
on the other little things that make the system a bit too cumbersome
for my liking. The synch and editing capabilities seemed excellent,
particularily if you're into film scoring which unfortunately I'm
not. The documentation is very good, but I think you need it which
to me is a downside. I also didnt like the very tiny fonts they
used which along with the all the screen clutter made it very difficult
for me to use when sat at my keyboard.
I decided on MTP based on the demo disk. Someone mentioned that
if you're going to be doing a lot of editing then this is the one..I
tend to agree, my compositions are 10% inspiration and 90% editing
so the graphical interface makes that job a little easier. Its a
pity you cant hear the note when you click on it in the track edit
window, I still have problems translating Bb4 into something that
relates to how I think the music should sound.
I also settled on the Passport interface (the simple one) and
paid $175 Can for it. I inherited a trait from my father that requires
me to take apart everything I get and see what makes it tick, well
opening the Passport interface caused me to puke when I saw what
I'd paid good money for. Probably no more than $25 worth of parts
in a cheap plastic box, admittedly they also supplied the necessary
cables but... ;-(
Anyway, thanks for your advice.
Ken
|
1753.9 | Good choice, Ken. You won't be disappointed. | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - back in Ohio. | Tue Nov 22 1988 17:10 | 0
|