T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1738.1 | K1r? | DRFIX::PICKETT | David - Beware of the dogma | Thu Oct 27 1988 13:14 | 3 |
| K1r? Am I missing something. Do you mean K1m?
dp
|
1738.2 | Correct me if I'm wrong. | MAY26::DIORIO | | Thu Oct 27 1988 13:25 | 6 |
|
The K1m and K1r are different. The K1m is a standalone box a la
MT-32. The K1r is a rackmount. As far as I know, however, the
electronics are exactly the same.
Mike D
|
1738.3 | WHO/WHAT/WHEN/WHERE & HOW MUCH? | WRO8A::CORTOPADA | | Thu Oct 27 1988 15:43 | 5 |
| As far as I understand, the K1r isn't available yet. If anyone
knows where to get one and for how much $$$... please fill in the
blanks.
DC
|
1738.4 | NOt yet... | NORGE::CHAD | Ich glaube Ich t�te Ich h�tte | Thu Oct 27 1988 15:53 | 3 |
|
Eddie at Wurly's said Xmas or thereabouts at the W'gig.
Chad
|
1738.5 | Is this a good deal?!??$%@?? | MUSKIE::ALLEN | | Mon Oct 31 1988 11:30 | 14 |
| My local dealer is offering his demo D110 for $699.00; is that a
good deal? I have never bought electronic gear used, particularly
musical stuff. What are the drawbacks? He's offering an 18mos
full warranty.
Also, since I can get a new one from Sam Ash for the same price,
are the potential "hassles" of mail-order better or worse?.
Clusters,
Bill Allen @MPO
ps One thing that worries me is that he doesn't "stock" the D110;
although they are an authorized ROLAND dealer they seem to push
other lines.
|
1738.6 | Ain't bad. | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - back in Ohio. | Mon Oct 31 1988 12:00 | 8 |
| If he's willing to give 18 mos. on the unit, and you can verify right
now that there are no problems with the unit, I'd buy it.
The price isn't bad, the warranty is good, and they wouldn't dare put a
buggy unit on display. Just make sure that someone hasn't beat the
thing to smitheroons (read: check all front panel controls).
-b
|
1738.7 | go for it | SUBSYS::ORIN | AMIGA te amo | Wed Nov 02 1988 14:30 | 13 |
| Bill,
I would say that the demo D110 should be fine. It has survived the
"infant mortality" phase. I have never had a piece of Roland gear
fail on the front panel switches or otherwise. The warranty protects you and you
are supporting your local music merchant who provides that big shiny
showroom full of MIDI toys. The return shipping mailorder for warranty
repair is somewhat of a hassle. You need the box, the packing material,
shipping label, trip to the P.O. for postage, etc.
good luck,
dave
|
1738.8 | And the winner is... | MUSKIE::ALLEN | | Thu Nov 03 1988 16:34 | 17 |
| re .7 & .6
Thanks Dave and Brad. I sprung for a new one after all.
This baby is a gas!!! Having another SGU is a quantum leap forward
in flexibility and variety. I can't wait to hear a stereo mixdown
on the big system, downstairs. I also had a chance to read through
some of the back notes on the D110 and the MT32. Seems like Roland
really tried to do something about the complaints voiced by users.
About the only thing they didn't improve on was the user interface,
which still is unacceptable but better than the MT32.
I will be interested to see what happens to KAWAI's K1. If they
push it as hard as they did the K5 it should do well in spite of
stiff competition from the D110. From the lack of response to this
note, it doesn't seem like there are many K1 fans in COMMUSICland.
EOF?
Bill Allen
|
1738.9 | good deal | SUBSYS::ORIN | AMIGA te amo | Fri Nov 04 1988 10:08 | 12 |
| Bill,
I heard the K1 at Wurlygig2 for the first time. I was very impressed with
the sound quality and variety. It seems like the perfect entry instrument
for someone who is looking for the <$1k multitimbral/drum machine/keyboard.
Kawai is playing in a tough field though with Roland, Yam, Casio, etc.
The competition is good for everyone, and hopefully will help keep the
prices down. Who knows, if the K1R price is low enough....... *^))
dave
ps. The next MIDIholics meeting will be in conference room H (as in Home)
|
1738.10 | Fill-in-the-blanks? | WRO8A::CORTOPADA | | Fri Nov 04 1988 11:19 | 4 |
| Multi-timbral??? Do you know how many voice, channels, etc? How
does is compare to the D110?
Thanx, dc
|
1738.11 | K1R info | SUBSYS::ORIN | AMIGA te amo | Fri Nov 04 1988 16:22 | 5 |
| Availability of K1R around Christmas. Price estimated at $595. Waiting list
at Wurly's. �8 voice, 8 channel multitimbral, onboard drum PCMs. Call Eddie
at 754-5271 for more info.
dave
|
1738.12 | sorry! | HAMER::COCCOLI | | Tue Jan 10 1989 12:33 | 7 |
| I tried em both side by side. In my opinion, K1 blew the doors off
the d10. The Roland has the worst sound I've heard in a while(must
be that MT32 architecture).
APologies to any Roland fans..
Rich C.
|
1738.13 | Comments for no one in particular. | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - back in Ohio. | Tue Jan 10 1989 12:44 | 19 |
| I also played a D10 during my 3 week hiatus, intending to upgrade from
my ESQ-Ms. After some pretty serious comparision, I decided to
not get the D10, drum kit notwithstanding.
Excepting the built-in reverb, the ESQ was able in all but a very few
instances to reproduce most of what the D10 would do (at least
comparing factory patches) ... and the D10 wasn't that much cleaner
than the ESQ to make it worthwhile. And the ESQ pianos blow the D10
away (again, my opinions).
In short, the D10/110 has a few more sonic possibilities, but the ESQ
is a heck of a lot easier to twiddle and set up, has a much nicer MIDI
implementation, and responds to any MIDI continuous controller
(including aftertouch).
If I were buying new, I might go for the D10, but I don't think
upgrading to one from an ESQ would buy much.
-b
|
1738.14 | Opinion agreement. | MAY26::DIORIO | | Tue Jan 10 1989 12:45 | 6 |
| RE -1
I agree 100% with Rich. I compared the two side-by-side and I thought
the K1r blew off the D110 also. And it's cheaper too!
Mike D
|
1738.15 | | HAMER::COCCOLI | monitoring reality......... | Fri Dec 08 1989 08:52 | 9 |
|
In an earlier reply to this topic, I trashed the D110 in favor
of the K1r. Now it seems I have both.
Ain't life a hoot?
Rich
|