T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1626.1 | | MTBLUE::BOTTOM_DAVID | louder than everything else | Wed Aug 17 1988 10:12 | 18 |
| If it's the thing I think it is its essentially this:
Take a speaker (capable of handling the watts you put through your
guitar amp) cover it with a funnel (glued in place etc.), run a hose
from the funnel to your mouth, run your guitar amp into this speaker.
Put the hose in your mouth, play guitar notes and mouth the appropriate
words into a microphone that runs into your PA. Also cleans your
teeth :-)
Joe Walsh and Peter Frampton, among others, used these alot ten
years or so ago. Check out Walsh's "Rocky Mountian Way" or Frampton's
solo work after leaving Frampton's camel (the names of these works
escape me at this time, was never a big PF fan, I do know that on
his "alive" album you can hear some of the voice box or talk box)
PAIA used to have a kit for one.
dbII
|
1626.2 | | IAMOK::CROWLEY | No we're not gonna do bloody Stonhenge! | Wed Aug 17 1988 10:24 | 7 |
|
....or it could have been a vocoder
ralph
|
1626.3 | What a fried name for a band. | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad ... DTN 433-2408 | Wed Aug 17 1988 10:26 | 7 |
| Not knowing the first thing about "Scritti Politti" (who?), I'll guess
that they're using some type of a vocal processor. Korg had one a few
years back called a DVP-1 ... there are a couple pro-end units that do
the kinds of things you mentioned in .0. Can't remember any names
right now, though.
-b
|
1626.4 | Argh. Race condition. You win, Ralph. | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad ... DTN 433-2408 | Wed Aug 17 1988 10:31 | 0 |
1626.5 | | IAMOK::CROWLEY | No we're not gonna do bloody Stonhenge! | Wed Aug 17 1988 10:32 | 12 |
|
I'm not too sure on the exact process, but a vocoder uses the signals
from singing into a mic to control the various VCF parameters of
a synth, hence the synth sounds take on the shape of someone
speaking or singing.
Can someone please explain this a little better?
Ralph
|
1626.6 | | COFLUB::DESELMS | Ignorance is Strength | Wed Aug 17 1988 10:32 | 5 |
| RE:.2 What's a vocoder?
RE:.3 Scritti Politti: It's dancy-pop sorta stuff. The lead singer's
kind of effeminate, but oh well, you find a lot of that in
dancy-pop music anyway.
|
1626.7 | I make it up as I go along | ANT::JANZEN | Tom 296-5421 LMO2/O23 | Wed Aug 17 1988 10:55 | 28 |
| maybe they're using a vocal synthesizer. A guitarist played
a vocal synthesizer at new music america in about 1982, so it's
about time for pop to catch up. ok, it was a speak&spel modified
to accept a pitch from a guitar.
a vocoder is a voice encoder (?) first built around 1940 by bell
labs (now at&T bell labs cf. unix). PAiA has a cheap kit for just
the processor, but vocoders for pop in the 70's had their
own keyboards. I think laurie anderson used one like this in
o superman. A vocoder can be used to impress your vocal
resonances and vowels onto any sound rich enough to reflect it.
The PAiA vocoder has some (probably 8) hi-Q band-pass filters
over a range of maybe 500-2000 hertz (the vowel harmonic range,
the harmonics that change when vowels change). An envelope
follower follows each filter. We now have 8 voltages giving
the amplitude of the sound in each frequency band.
These voltages drive voltage-controlled amplifiers. The audio
signal going into the VCAs can be anything. Something rich like
a pulse tone or sawtooth is best.
When driven with a narrow pulse tone ca. 200 hertz, and fed a
professional announcer on FM radio, the PAiA vocoder will be
undertandable 90% of the time (with no through). THe kit is 99$.
It is hard to adjust for my voice and my synth. Anderson was
right to use mostly octaves and open fifths into the vocoder.
If all you want is to gate sounds, get a gate, or a VCA and an
envelope follower, but that's almost as much with a power supply.
Tom
|
1626.8 | | ANT::JANZEN | Tom 296-5421 LMO2/O23 | Wed Aug 17 1988 10:57 | 4 |
| I forgot to add that the tone source (e.g. a synth) also has
to be broken out by a bank of bandpassfilters.
then at the end they're all mixed together.
Tom
|
1626.9 | its a vox box | HJUXB::LEGA | Bug Busters Incorporated | Wed Aug 17 1988 11:01 | 9 |
|
I have the album, and it definatly is a voice box.
(speaker driver connected to tube, which plays into ones miked mouth)
In fact on the song "Boom there she was" you can hear the
voiceboxed synth mixed with the actual spoken (with tube in mouth)
voice mixed in. A vocoder generally cant deal with sillibance
or hard consonsence like a voxbox. Vocoders usually have a knob
for mixing in the raw sound with the vocoded sounds
|
1626.10 | Wow! | COFLUB::DESELMS | Ignorance is Strength | Wed Aug 17 1988 12:03 | 8 |
| Here I was, thinking that this was some type of state-of-the-art
technical gagetry, but it's just a tube attached to a speaker?
I think I wanna try this!
One question, though... how can you enunciate with a tube
in your mouth. 8-/
Jim
|
1626.11 | I did it for art's sake! | CTHULU::YERAZUNIS | I forgot to take my memory pills! | Wed Aug 17 1988 12:15 | 8 |
| You don't!
Instead, drill a 1/4" hole thru one cheek, thread the hole to take
a 1/8 NPT pipe, and attach the tube to the pipe.
:-)
-Bill
|
1626.12 | Oral GBH | MARVIN::MACHIN | | Wed Aug 17 1988 12:23 | 5 |
| Insure your dental work before attempting the gobbox tactic.
Also, tonsils (if you have them) take a bruising when you crank
up the volume.
Richard.
|
1626.13 | | BIGALO::BOTTOM_DAVID | louder than everything else | Wed Aug 17 1988 12:27 | 10 |
| You don't actually speak, all the sound is from your guitar (I suppose
you could drive this via a synth) you merely shape it using you
mouth. I tried one once, they're a bit tricky and without the PA
to pick it up and amplify it it's not much to hear, caution: at
high volume levels your hearing gets blasted from the inside of
your head...
good luck
dbII
|
1626.14 | a little surgical tubing can go a long way ... | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | socialism doesn't work ... | Wed Aug 17 1988 12:44 | 9 |
| Why not just run a couple of tubes up your nose? With a little
work, you might be able to get them to rest comfortably just above
your epiglottis, allowing the sounds to be more natural. A compromise
would be to run just one tube, so that (unless you have a cold)
you can breathe freely.
;^)
Steve
|
1626.15 | | COFLUB::DESELMS | Ignorance is Strength | Wed Aug 17 1988 13:00 | 2 |
| I think I'll take the two-tube deal. Ya see, when it comes to sound
quality, even breath and life are a fair sacrifice...
|
1626.16 | up periscope | MARVIN::MACHIN | | Wed Aug 17 1988 13:05 | 6 |
| re: .14
Where d'you suggest he stick the single-tube option?
Richard.
|
1626.17 | I don't recommend one - at least not live. | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad ... DTN 433-2408 | Wed Aug 17 1988 13:46 | 18 |
| On a more serious note ...
There's usually a �" piece of tube coming out of the squwak-box. I used
to tape it to the side of a mic stand so that it ran right up as a mic
& cord would, but extended past the mic about 2-3".
The box had an in/out switch so it could be muted. And as said before,
it will blow your head off at any kind of volume level. It amounts to
sticking a 15" driver in your mouth and using it as a filter/envelope
combo. More than 2 or 3 minutes will guarantee you a head-splitter.
And like Richard said - make sure your dentist did a good job. Fillings
have been known to come out.
Oh - the tube is usually put in the side of the mouth. You use your
teeth to bite down on the tube to control the sound pressure level,
along with your mouth ...
-b
|
1626.18 | I want that sound!!! | COFLUB::DESELMS | Ignorance is Strength | Wed Aug 17 1988 14:02 | 6 |
| OK, I wanna do this, but I don't want to sacrifice my hearing, dental
work, or sanity. Anybody know an alternative, or should I just
keep the volume down?
-- Ever questioning,
Jim
|
1626.19 | 1 joe walsh song too many | SRFSUP::MORRIS | Banff Schwantz, Attorney at law | Wed Aug 17 1988 14:13 | 10 |
| The best way I've found is to avoid using a speaker. Just take
a horn driver, and stick some plastic in there. Seal it with silicone
and then get progressively smaller plastic until it's about 1/2
inch diameter, and stick that in the back side of yer mouth.
Or for a cheap copy, use a fish tank pump.
Don't ask me how I know this.
Ashley
|
1626.20 | Mutron III/Doctor Q | DARTS::OPER | | Wed Aug 17 1988 14:51 | 7 |
|
As an alternative, locate and old Mutron III or Electro-Harmonix
Doctor Q. Use a mic as a source, and you can scat sing. I used
to do this a long time ago - it was a great effect.
Guy Novello
|
1626.21 | Throw money at the problem... | CTHULU::YERAZUNIS | Eat hot X-rays, alien menace! | Wed Aug 17 1988 15:34 | 8 |
| Or build a vocoder...
which may cost a few bucks but heck, that's the name of this hobby.
...Isn't it ? :-)
-Bill
|
1626.22 | One good elbow leads to another ;-) | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Yo! | Wed Aug 17 1988 16:17 | 29 |
| re: .7
> maybe they're using a vocal synthesizer. A guitarist played
> a vocal synthesizer at new music america in about 1982, so it's
> about time for pop to catch up. ok, it was a speak&spel modified
> to accept a pitch from a guitar.
Catch up. Hardly.
The first vocodor type device I ever saw used was by a pop band
(The Good Rats) in the late seventies. They even used it on an
album.
The first guitar-controlling-synth device I ever saw used was in 1975
by Steve Morse. It was made by 360 Systems. Steve used it on an
album too.
Now although these are the first uses I know of, I doubt they were
the "first uses" because in both cases, the devices being used were
commercially available devices. During this time I was beginning
my "awakening" (expanding my musical horizons beyond classical)
and thus for all I know, these device had been available for years.
This ground-breaking guitar player that Tom mentions could have saved
himself a lot of trouble, and perhaps focused his attention on
something that really was new by venturing into his neighborhood
music store every so often. ;-)
db
|
1626.23 | Trade journals SELL, tech journals INFORM | ANT::JANZEN | Tom 296-5421 LMO2/O23 | Wed Aug 17 1988 17:02 | 42 |
| >< Note 1626.22 by DREGS::BLICKSTEIN "Yo!" >
> -< One good elbow leads to another ;-) >-
>
> re: .7
>
> > maybe they're using a vocal synthesizer. A guitarist played
> > a vocal synthesizer at new music america in about 1982, so it's
> > about time for pop to catch up. ok, it was a speak&spel modified
> > to accept a pitch from a guitar.
>
> Catch up. Hardly.
>
> The first vocodor type device I ever saw used was by a pop band
> (The Good Rats) in the late seventies. They even used it on an
> album.
The speak and spel is not a vocoder. It speaks. It synthesizes speech.
When this guy played guitar, the speak and spel SANG WORDS on its
own, not just modifying a synth with stupid looking plastic tube
in the guy's mouth like some adult pacifier or drool catcher.
>>
> The first guitar-controlling-synth device I ever saw used was in 1975
> by Steve Morse. It was made by 360 Systems. Steve used it on an
> album too.
2 cents says it wasn't singing words. the speak and spel did. In
'82 it was the cheapest way to do it.
>
> Now although these are the first uses I know of, I doubt they were
> the "first uses" because in both cases, the devices being used were
> commercially available devices. During this time I was beginning
> my "awakening" (expanding my musical horizons beyond classical)
> and thus for all I know, these device had been available for years.
>
the vocoder is 45-50 years old.
> This ground-breaking guitar player that Tom mentions could have saved
> himself a lot of trouble, and perhaps focused his attention on
> something that really was new by venturing into his neighborhood
> music store every so often. ;-)
if you want to know what will be in the stores in 1993, read the
MIT computer music journal.
> db>
Tom
|
1626.24 | I hope not! | COFLUB::DESELMS | Ignorance is Strength | Wed Aug 17 1988 17:47 | 4 |
| By "Speak and spel" you're not referring to that Texas Instruments
toy are you?
Jim
|
1626.25 | | ANT::JANZEN | Tom 296-5421 LMO2/O23 | Wed Aug 17 1988 18:11 | 3 |
| hey man, it works, it's cheap, and when did you hear a computer
under $100 dollars sing before 1982?
Tom
|
1626.26 | Roger | KLO::COLLINS | STEVE | Thu Aug 18 1988 05:13 | 18 |
|
The voice box sound on the "provision" album is not done by Scritti
Politti but by a guy called Roger Troughtman sp?
I have one of his previous albums on which he uses it extensively ,he
had a minor hit over here about six moths ago under the name of
just "Roger" .The song was called something like "I just wanna
be you man" and the vocals were all voice box.
I remember reading someplace that this guy "developed" this voice
box himself and likes to keep it's exact operation a bit of a secret.
But I wouldn't be suprised if it was the speaker & hose configuration.
His album is very good (Can't remember the name at the moment) .
If you like this sound you should listen to it for much better
use of the voice box than the Scritti Politti album.
Steve..
|
1626.27 | more on Troutman | MPGS::DEHAHN | | Thu Aug 18 1988 08:50 | 8 |
|
Before he was a solo artist he was with a band called "Zapp" which had
a few hits, one I can think of was "Computer Love". Every song used the
'voice box' on some of the vocals.
CdH
|
1626.28 | another vocoder reference | GIBSON::DICKENS | vacation bound | Thu Aug 18 1988 18:11 | 10 |
| A somewhat more accessible vocoder reference is Neil Young's Trans
album. I think he vocodes Nils Lofgren's guitar as well as his
own. The video of the same period shows it in use.
This is for those who find "Trans" easier to stand than Laurie
Anderson. I don't know which I'd take, and I hope I never have
to choose....
-Jeff
|
1626.29 | May I? | DENALI::KELLYNI | | Thu Aug 18 1988 20:25 | 20 |
| Computer World by Kraftwork used a speak and spell...
I had one when I was a little smaller and I would jam with the tape
all the time.
To avoid getting your lips vibrated off by the voice box maybe one
could sample the source and replay it on que. Just a sugestion.
There was a guitarest who used some kind of modualtor on stage all
the time several years ago. A song called "Do you feel like I do"
by a guy I don't know come to mind. He would mouth the words and
articulate using his tounge and lips and the quitare struck at the
right moment would make the appearence of a talking guitar. wow.
\
(\__^
< <
--Nick
|
1626.30 | Hey. We're on one of those albums. | PANGLS::BAILEY | | Thu Aug 18 1988 21:19 | 5 |
| Re: Kraftwerk
Then they graduated to a DECtalk...
Steph
|
1626.31 | I'll name that Frampton !! | WARMTH::KAYD | If music be the love of food... | Fri Aug 19 1988 05:22 | 17 |
|
re .29
That was Peter Frampton on the 'Frampton Comes Alive' album. The
more famous track (here in the U.K.) was 'Show me the way'. The
other guitarist in a band I was in way back used to play the solo
using a wah-wah pedal but with a 12" piece of tube taped to the
mike stand - it fooled the audience most of the time :-) :-)
By the way, the Pet Shop Boys 'Two divided by zero' track uses
a sampled 'Speak and Maths' (was this a 'Speak and Math' in the
U.S. ??)
Cheers,
Derek.
|
1626.32 | At the expense of veering from the subject... | COFLUB::DESELMS | Ignorance is Strength | Fri Aug 19 1988 11:32 | 7 |
| Re: .29...
\
(\__^
< <
What the heck is that?!?
|
1626.33 | Not "all the time" | CSC32::G_HOUSE | Help Me Spock | Fri Aug 19 1988 13:57 | 10 |
| re: .29 Incidently, Peter Frampton did not use that effect "all the
time" as you mentioned. In fact, he used it quite rarely. That song
just happened to become monsterously popular, where most of his music
didn't, and he became known for it. Like Joe Walsh, I don't think he
used the talk box that much either, but he's famous for it. He
used a Wah a lot more.
No flames intended, just a point of interest.
gh
|
1626.34 | RE:.32 | DENALI::KELLYNI | | Fri Aug 19 1988 17:34 | 6 |
|
re:.32
It can be anything you want it to be. To me it resembles a Unicorn.
--Nick
|
1626.35 | Robert Plant - Walking Towards Paradise | TOOK::DDS_SEC | Put a Korg in it. | Sun Aug 21 1988 15:22 | 10 |
| If I'm hearing correctly, Robert Plant uses some sort of voice box
hooked up to a heavily distorted guitar in "Walking Towards Paradise" from
his new album Now and Zen. I don't think it uses that tube-stuff, though,
even though I haven't heard one; it sounds like some sophisticated filter-
driven articulation processor. It isn't really too understandable until
you hear the real lyrics and make the connection. BTW, this is an excellent
full digital CD and I happen to like his music a lot. If you do, be sure to
get this CD!
--mike--
|
1626.36 | | GIBSON::DICKENS | Ugh.. | Tue Sep 13 1988 16:39 | 5 |
| If you've got love in your sights, watch out, love bites...
You have to listen closely for that one.
|
1626.37 | Scorpion? | YES::CLARY | Don't leave your heart in a hard place | Mon Sep 26 1988 08:51 | 3 |
| re .32
Looks like a scorpion to me.
|
1626.38 | IRRELEVANCE IS THE SPICE OF LIFE | CASV02::SEDER | | Fri Nov 04 1988 11:33 | 7 |
| RE.32
Looks like a baby carriage to me.
|
1626.39 | | EAKINS::DESELMS | | Fri Nov 04 1988 13:33 | 6 |
| RE: -1
You too? I thought it looked like a baby carriage at first but
I thought I was the only one... so I didn't say anything.
- Jim (Sorry Mr. K)
|
1626.40 | | SRFSUP::MORRIS | SuRF'S UP :: MORe RISk | Fri Nov 04 1988 17:10 | 14 |
|
Heil sound had an advert in some Guitar magazine last month stating
that they would reintroduce the talk box this month.
1989-January 4, Billboard Magazine...
"Rocky Mountain Way crushes Do You Feel Like I Do for number one
slot on pop chart. Joe Walsh credits Heil Sound for Platinum single".
Well, maybe not....
Ashley
|