[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | * * Computer Music, MIDI, and Related Topics * * |
Notice: | Conference has been write-locked. Use new version. |
Moderator: | DYPSS1::SCHAFER |
|
Created: | Thu Feb 20 1986 |
Last Modified: | Mon Aug 29 1994 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2852 |
Total number of notes: | 33157 |
1502.0. "A particularly rough mixdown" by CTHULU::YERAZUNIS (It works fine, provided you _want_ things to explode upon arriva) Fri Jul 01 1988 15:10
I've finally calmed down enough to write about it...
Last thursday, a friend who does pro audio called me up. Seems
they had a Big Concert to do, and his backup engineer wanted the
weekend off, and could I fill in on such short notice...
I (having a big mouth) said "gimme five minutes", checked my
calendar, called him back, said "Sure". He said "Great, we start
at 5AM, in Gardener"
"At Five in the %&^*% MORNING? "
"It's all-day. Expect to finish loadout by 11."
"Is that AM or PM?"
"PM. I told you this is _all day_"
"Where is this Gardener place? You mean the Garden?"
"No, GardenER. It's somewhere in Massachusetts. That's all I know."
"What's the venue like?"
"Do you want the good news or the bad news?"
"Good news."
"5000+ people, outdoor, roof over stage. 6 acts. "
"And the bad news?"
"It's Christian Rock."
<<<silence>>>
"Hello?"
Now I was brought up Christian, and my choice of deity to offend
when I solder my finger or stub my toe is the Christian one. But
Christian ROCK? What about providing good quality audio? What about
professional detachment? What about earplugs?
"Yeah, OK."
"Bring whatever tools you want."
I decided against the flamethrower- but I did wear my camoflage
and dark sunglasses, hoping no one would recognize me.
-----
We were scheduled to soundcheck by 9. We didn't even have electricity
to the site by 9. We managed to get house audio by 11, all 4000 watts
of it balanced and eq'd, running tapes. At noon, the first artists
("The Choir", moderate heavy metal) were supposed to start. By 12:30,
the artists had finished setting up on stage. We talked them out of
soundcheck and went right into the first set.
I basically settled in behind the house board and my friend George took
the stage monitor board. He trusts me with the house amps because he
knows how I hate unclean sound.
Abstracting out the lyrics (which I can't understand thru Sonic
II's or Shooters anyway), here's my rating:
The Choir was pretty good,
Take 6 was EXCELLENT,
Charlie Peacock was GOOD,
then two track artists, uhhhh, I don't remember anything about
these except one had her acoustic guitar blow off the stage,
quite a bit of wind there was.
then there was two HOURS of preaching - see below...
and then the big act: AMY GRANT
Amy Grant. She's supposed to be heavy into hard-rock now, lotsa
synths, right? Definite top-40, right? So all of these troubles
we're having with miking acoustic guitar and piano and making 5000
people hear it loud and clear, and riding the gain to keep from
feeding back, all this should go away, right?
Well, she comes out, and says "We're goin' on a tour later this
year, with the whole band and racks of electronic stuff, but since
we all here are family (sure, sure) I thought it might be nice to
just use this.
AND SHE HOLDS OUT THIS SIX-STRING ACOUSTIC!
Well, we mike it, and amazingly we can get up to 98 dB at the house
board (150 feet away), no feedback, beautifully clear.
---------
The show finished at 9:15 or so. People start leaving the fields,
we start packing gear. Two hours later, at 11:30, we're not even
starting to load the truck- and there are still cars backed up on
the access road to the site.
Thunderstorms roll in. We push stuff from the covered stage into
the truck during lulls in the rain. By 12:45 the truck is loaded
and the door refuses to close. Ten minutes of repack, and the
door closes.
We roll off the site at 1:04 AM, Sunday morning. Time on site:
20 hours, 4 minutes.
----------
Now the preaching part. Let's just say it took a _large amount_ of
professional detachment to stay at the board during two hours of
born-again witnessing. And never once did I let go to my desire to
shreikback the mains following some particularly vehement assertion of
religious Correctness.
Now, I don't intend to offend someone's personal feelings, but there
was one point that I found very moving: the _way_ these preachers
preached.
I had the good fortune to learn German from a real German...
a wonderful woman who left Germany in 1937. She used to
be a secretary there... worked for I.G. Farben. Makers of the gas
used in the gas chambers. She felt that WWII was not something
to hide in some dark closet, nor to cry unceasing tears over,
but rather to be learned from, painful as the lesson may be.
In one session, she showed us a film of one of Hitler's speeches.
She asked us to listen, and to watch, and to see just how
Hitler manipulated the emotions and bypassed the intellect,
went below the level of critical thought and into the levels
of unthinking loyalty.
And she asked us to be on our gaurd, should we ever see it again.
Well, I saw those same techniques for bypassing reason on stage,
and I was _afraid_.
My greatest worry is that the humanity's veneer of reason is so
thin, and so easily pierced.
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1502.1 | A calculated reply | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - DTN 433-2408 | Fri Jul 01 1988 19:23 | 18 |
| RE: .0
Not all Christians are flaming horses' hind-ends. Some are real. The
people who do the "Hitler"-esque song and dance are doing just that: a
song and dance. People who claim to be "Christians" should act like
the guy from Whom they get their name - Jesus. I don't ever recall Him
trying to bypass the intellect.
No flames here, Bill ... and I don't mean to wax ethical in a
conference that is not based on ethics or religion ... but there are
bozos in every crowd. Don't base opinions of Jesus on the improper
actions of someone who *claims* to be His follower.
So (back to the topic) are you saying that Amy's whole show was
acoustic? Not even a little bit of synth gear? Anything musically
remarkable about any of the bands?
-b
|
1502.2 | Such is life | MIDEVL::YERAZUNIS | by an unnamed spokesman | Tue Jul 05 1988 12:26 | 25 |
| I noticed exactly two synths in the entire 9+ hours of the show:
A Y-word DX-7 (the crabgrass of synthesizers)
An Oberheim Xpander (yeay!!)
both controlled from a wx-7 (group was The Choir)
There was an acoustic piano on stage (which was never miked quite
right, unfortunately. We had a Beyer piano pickup but the production
manager did not like them, she wanted B&K microphones under the
cover. Harummph!)
-----
Amy Grant _did_ make a point of saying that her upcoming tour will
be "the whole band, racks and racks of synthesizers, electric guitars,
and such, but since we're all family here..." And her pickup'ed
acoustic guitar did have a very nice sound with the secondary mike.
-------
I don't mind Christianity; as a code of behavior it is well-founded in
sociobiology (that is to say, it's theoretically on at least marginally
firm ground). The part about coming in under peoples' intellectual
radar is what pushed my panic button.
|
1502.3 | What conference is this? | YES::CLARY | This is not a dark ride. | Tue Jul 05 1988 14:20 | 10 |
| RE: 1502.2
> I don't mind Christianity; as a code of behavior it is well-founded in
> sociobiology (that is to say, it's theoretically on at least marginally
> firm ground). The part about coming in under peoples' intellectual
> radar is what pushed my panic button.
Commusic! Commusic? Commusic! Commusic? Commusic! Commusic?
?
Bob
|
1502.4 | I might point out that ... | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - DTN 433-2408 | Tue Jul 05 1988 15:13 | 1 |
| Next unseen works very well, thank you.
|
1502.5 | | SALSA::MOELLER | 114�F, but it's a DRY heat (thud) | Tue Jul 05 1988 16:57 | 8 |
| Well, thanks for talking about it, Bill.
Can't put a fence around things all the time.. for Bill the concert
was not JUST the A)Musical content B)Technical problems, but obviously
it triggered some strong C)FEELINGS along the way.. and he was honest
enough to talk about C) along with A) and B).
karl
|
1502.6 | Art vs. Profession | MIDEVL::YERAZUNIS | by an unnamed spokesman | Tue Jul 05 1988 17:55 | 16 |
|
Karl: You're welcome. No problem.
So, how do the rest of you techies deal with a similar situation;
where you are working (in a semi-artistic rather than
computer-oriented job) and you find a strong emotional feeling toward
(or against) the content (rather than the form)?
-------
BTW, it is _much_ easier to mix four synthesists than four acoustic
musicians. No feedback, no EQ, and no unplugging the mikes while
they're potted up (I don't believe it but Take 6 did!!!).
-Bill
|
1502.7 | Exposed to the classics ... | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | incompetence knows no bounds | Wed Jul 06 1988 00:13 | 44 |
| Well, this will get sidetracked a bit, but ...
While my wife was going to school (working on her B.S. in Music
Performance) she was the Concert Mistress for the University of Missouri
Philharmonic (for about four years). During this time, I went to
a lot of concerts and recitals (two of which I paid bucks for - you know,
programs and her pianist's time). At the time, I was working on
my engineering degrees and working on the side. Anyway, I heard
a lot of classical stuff. I became a fan of Debussy and particularly
enjoyed the show tunes. But, I also listened to a lot of other
classical stuff (Wagner - ecch!) as well as experimental stuff and
music written more to show off the dexterity of the player than
the creativity of the composer. I suppose it was good for me, but
I didn't like it. (I kept wanting to turn up the bass, etc.)
Once, I made the mistake of mentioning to a trumpet player that
was a friend of my wife's and who had just finished playing a
recital,
'Gee, that was pretty good. Of course, there were those two
little goofs in the middle, but it was better than I could
do ...' [I'm a former trombone player...]
Well, my wife glared at me and later made very clear to me that
pointing out the faults in a live performance to the player (especially
to a close friend of hers) could result in, among other inconveniences,
revocation of husbandly privileges, and I did repent.
Now, I know better. A knowing whince only audible enough for my
spouse to hear is sufficient when squeekers are detected by my
now-discerning ears. Afterwards, if it's good, I tell them 'It was
great!'. If it was bad, I tell them something like, 'I don't think
I've ever heard anything quite like it!'. And, I never cough or make
other disgusting noises right before the piece starts, clap until the
piece is over, or give a standing ovation unless it's truly deserved.
(Of course, I realize that this behavior would be totally inappropriate,
nay, rude - perhaps even deemed offensive, in a less formal setting
such as a rock ... um ... 'concert'.)
Anyway, I am now enlightened and can therefore justify gittin' down
with my synths or listening to tapes in my car at glove-box-rattling
volume, for I have exposed myself to the classics ...
Steve ;-)
|
1502.8 | Point taken | YES::CLARY | This is not a dark ride. | Wed Jul 06 1988 08:13 | 7 |
| RE: .5
Point taken. I guess it would be like getting assign to a project in DEC
that is for a defense contracter when you have objections to that kind of
thing. (not my case, just an example). Its a side of a technical issue.
Bob
|