T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1429.1 | Go with the HR | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - DTN 433-2408 | Fri Jun 03 1988 13:11 | 20 |
| I've played around a bit with several "percussion producing units",
including the MT, TR-707, TR-505, DDD-5, and various Y_word RX boxes.
The HR16 blows every other box I've ever heard away. Period. If you
intend to use the thing as strictly an SGU (sound gen. unit), then you
can't go wrong. The only gripes I have about it is that the quality of
mfg is not-too-great, it's not rack-mountable, and it uses a stinking
wall bug power supply. Other than that, it's a dynamite unit.
The machine is almost *too* tunable. You can tune darn near an octave
each way. And if cymbals are important ... well, there is simply no
comparison with the MT.
If you had ideas about using the LA capabilities of the MT, then
this becomes a whole different ballgame.
-b
P.S. Incidentally, I just bought an HR, and my requirements were/are
quite similar to yours.
|
1429.2 | Get a REAL drum machine... | JAWS::COTE | Are you buying this at all?? | Fri Jun 03 1988 13:19 | 14 |
|
I don't think you can beat the HR with anything in it's price
range.
It's got all the features (tunability, dynamics, etc.) you want.
It's quiet as all get out. (The MT32 appears to be noisy.) It's got
49 (50?) voices, 16 available at a time. Plus they throw in a fair
to good sequencer so you can save the memory on your atari for pitch
bends.
Edd
|
1429.3 | I got the claps. | JON::ROSS | shiver me timbres.... | Fri Jun 03 1988 14:35 | 9 |
|
If you're satisfied with AM radio bandwidth, any machine will do.
If you like fidelity and realism,
HR-16 is cost effective solution.
ron
|
1429.4 | 30 drum sounds are enough for me | TYFYS::MOLLER | Vegetation: A way of life | Fri Jun 03 1988 16:02 | 23 |
| I have to admit that the MT-32's drums are equalized with a studio
in mind, and not neccesarily Live performance. I've put my 2 10
band equalizers to frequent use for the sterio outputs, jsut to
get things to sound right in the PA system. On the other hand, I
wanted the MT-32 for all of it, not just the drums. I own another
Alesis product (the MMT-8 sequencer), and it's remarkably slipshod
in it's manufacture. The buttons have major keybounce problems (you
don't always get what you thought you entered) & the documentation
stinks. However, for the price, it is tolerable. I decided against
the HR-16 because it was not that much better than the MT-32 for
what I had planned to use it for & for all of the problems that
the HR-16 seems to have (look at the HR-16 note - over 300 entries
& lots of complaints). I also suspect that since Alesis could put
it together, then the rest of the pack won't be far behind, and
they'll address some of the HR-16's quality issues. I did a side
by side comparison of the drum sounds, in a music shop (ProSound
- In Colorado Springs), thru the same Keyboard Amp & Decided that
the MT-32 was a more cost effective solution, without a significant
perceieved differance in sound (at least to me). I suggest that
you do the same sort of thing. None of the MT-32's drum sounds are
adjustable (other than Modulation, Pitch Bend Wheel, or Expression)
without Software running on a PC.
Jens
|
1429.5 | Thanks. Now for more questions... | HARDY::JKMARTIN | The Doctype Police are after me... | Fri Jun 03 1988 16:31 | 17 |
| re: all of the above
Thanks for the comments!
re: .4
Pardon my ignorance, but are you saying that I can use pitch bending with the
MT-32's drum sounds? That makes it *sorta* tunable, eh? (or no?) I realize
that I would have to use an external computer to achieve this, but at least
it sounds possible (and gives me a *lot* more sounds). The noise complaints
don't look to good, though...
Boy, I musta missed something about the MT-32 reviews. You say that the MT-32
has LA sounds? Like the D-50?
...jay
|
1429.6 | I think I've confused you | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | The height of MIDIocrity | Fri Jun 03 1988 17:19 | 19 |
| Jay, I think you have been confused by something I've said at one time
or another (I have a vague recollection of mentioning the HR-16 and the
MT-32 in the same breath).
There is *NO QUESTION* but tht going from a TR-505 to an MT-32 for
drum sounds is anything BUT an upgrade. The MT-32's drum kit is
useable, but hardly worth getting for drums.
It sounds like you may not understand that the MT-32 isn't really
a drum machine. It's a multi-voice, multi-timbral synth without
a keyboard. It's based on the D-50 (LA synth). The drums are
an afterthought if anything.
The HR-16 is a top-notch drum machine. It sounds infinitely better
than the MT-32 drums, it IS tunable, and it costs LESS than the MT-32
(which is not a criticism of the MT-32 cause we're talking apples
and oranges here).
db
|
1429.8 | Not even a useful hack | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | The height of MIDIocrity | Fri Jun 03 1988 17:31 | 12 |
| re: .7
Moot point. I am almost sure that what you'd find is that the drums
correspond to the controller that's dedicated to pitch bend.
That however, applies to all notes on that channel.
That means that drums are not individually tunable. And really,
that is NOT a feasible way of doing it.
Suffice it to say that the MT-32 drums are *NOT* tunable.
db
|
1429.9 | Fixed | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | The height of MIDIocrity | Fri Jun 03 1988 17:32 | 5 |
| BTW, I don't think that the interval of the pitch bend is adjustable,
not even by computer. I think it's permanently fixed at an octave, but
I'm not sure.
db
|
1429.10 | addeddumdedumdedum.. | JAWS::COTE | Are you buying this at all?? | Fri Jun 03 1988 17:57 | 6 |
| Despite it's shortcomings, I really think that, given the units
I've heard, getting anything other than an HR-16 is a compromise.
I've never heard anything I thought sounded better. Some *real* drums
sound worse.
Edd
|
1429.11 | I think the votes are in.. | HARDY::JKMARTIN | The Doctype Police are after me... | Fri Jun 03 1988 23:43 | 29 |
| Hmm... Seems like I left off a rather subconcious (unconcious?) priority I
always keep in the back of my mind: whenever you can, grab for a useful,
general purpose sound generator.
Of course, I left this off my list. (Yes, a little like introducing characters
in the last chapter of a book.)
I always realized that "tuning" by way of pitch bend is (at best) a horrid
hack, but please try to keep in mind this is coming from a person who is
downright *desparate* to obtain some DIFFERENT percussion sounds for
compositions.
(You ardent analysts of the now famous COMMUSIC recording series know the
situation: on comes an otherwise great tune, then all of the sudden......
"Oh, they're using a TR-505.")
At the risk of sounding like a prima donna (but I bet I'm not alone here ;-),
I just *gotta* have percussion that doesn't stand out like a sore thumb and
eventually detract from the piece. And suffice to say, the TR-505 doesn't
hack it.
Yes, it's pretty obvious that the HR-16 nails the MT-32 for any type of
serious (or semi-serious) percussion composition. And from the sounds of
it, it even looks pretty good from a price/performance standpoint (that is,
the sound generation doesn't really come "free" with the MT-32).
Thanks for the clarification.
...jay
|
1429.12 | check out D110 | SUBSYS::ORIN | AMIGA te amo | Mon Jun 06 1988 12:24 | 12 |
| Jay -
Have you considered the D110. It has 63 percussion sounds, some of which I've
never heard in any other machine. There are all sorts of muted cymbals, some
interesting f/x, it is programmable from the front panel, great MIDI
implementation, one space rack mount, no wall bug power supply, etc. etc.
It lists for about $999. In addition to the drums and percussion, there are
192 other timbres, each of which can be assigned to one of 8 parts. This is
a fantastic sound module.
dave
|
1429.13 | D110 Output jacks? | HARDY::JKMARTIN | The Doctype Police are after me... | Mon Jun 06 1988 13:20 | 9 |
| re: .12
Thanks for the D110 pointer, Dave. Do you know off hand whether it has
separate outputs? I rather like the interesting compromise featured with
the HR-16 (two stereo pairs, with pan control and output assignment for
each voice).
...jay
|
1429.14 | Forget it, it doesn't work | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | The height of MIDIocrity | Mon Jun 06 1988 13:38 | 26 |
| >I always realized that "tuning" by way of pitch bend is (at best) a horrid
>hack, but please try to keep in mind this is coming from a person who is
>downright *desparate* to obtain some DIFFERENT percussion sounds for
>compositions.
Although I think this is now a mute point, what I'm saying goes
well beyond that.
I'm not criticizing it for being a hack. Hacks are fine in my
opinion. I'm saying that it won't give you anything useful.
Besides, I doubt that the MT-32 drums respond to pitch bend.
It would be a "bug" if it did. Far more of a limitation than
an advantage because you couldn't use pitch bend and the drums
at the same time.
If you want "different" sounds, you would be far better off picking up
something that samples sounds.
It may seem convenient for me to mention that as I am selling a drum
machine (Casio RZ-1) that samples sounds, but I think it's good advice.
And I'll sell it to you for a lot less than either an HR-16 or an
MT-32.
Trust me. Abandon this pitch bend nonsense.
db
|
1429.15 | more D110 | SUBSYS::ORIN | AMIGA te amo | Mon Jun 06 1988 15:54 | 15 |
| The D110 has 2 stereo "mix outputs" and 6 individual assignable outputs. You
can assign the parts (voices) to the output of your choice. Panning is also
included. The D110 is a D10 without the keyboard, but is programmable from
the front panel, unlike the MT32. The percussion sounds are excellent. The
only noticeably deficient sound is the crash cymbal which has an obvious loop
point when played alone. There is no clicking, but there is a detectable
difference in volume at the loop point. In context with the rest of the
instruments, the looping is not noticeable unless you listen for it
specifically. The HR16 has brighter sounds with more high harmonics, but
this can be overbearing in some music. For loud fast tunes, the HR16 is
great. For soft subtle music, the D110 is nice. The built-in demo gives a
good example of both types. I'm not sure yet, but I think each sound is
tuneable. I'm about � way thru the manual so far.
dave
|
1429.16 | Specs/Price for Casio RZ-1? | HARDY::JKMARTIN | The Doctype Police are after me... | Mon Jun 06 1988 16:58 | 13 |
| re: .14
Alright already!!! Pitch bend won't hack it, I realize that. Thanks for
making the point sooooooo obvious, Dave. ;-)
Alright, so now you've tantalized us with the notion of selling your RZ-1
unit. I had come across that unit in looking for alternatives, but couldn't
find any specs (or prices).
So now you've commited yourself: cough up the specs and suggested sale price!
...jay
|
1429.17 | Tuneable Drums on MT32 !! | RDGENG::JEWELL | | Mon Aug 22 1988 12:57 | 14 |
| Right then .. I think its time I added my six-pence worth..
To set the record straight, the MT32 does have tunable drums. For
those of you with either an MT32 editor, or a bit of patience and
a method of entering system exclusive data, it is quite easy. All
you need to do is assign a drum sound to one of user patches (look
in the midi-spec for how to do this) and then adjust the relative
tuning. Drum sounds can be tuned over the entire keyboard range,
and some pretty wacky sounds can be accessed.
Thought I'd better mention this ..
Tony.
|