T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1347.1 | Dr T's | PAULJ::HARRIMAN | That's me | Tue May 03 1988 09:28 | 27 |
|
One which you have not mentioned is Dr. T's Keyboard Controlled
Sequencer. I am using that one, if only because it came with my
computer when I bought it. Actually, it's not a bad program at all,
although it can be rather cryptic at times.
It has 48 MIDI tracks, can 'do' 16 channels. I don't know about
separate MIDI outs (this is an ST topic, right? STs only have ONE
MIDI out)... It knows 12 types of MIDI events in the Track mode,
and you can combine tracks into "sequences" which are essentially
compartmentalized mixdowns of tracks. You may then string sequences
together into songs. I haven't gotten much past track mode, which
is set up like a very fast-acting tape recorder. It does cueing,
punch-in-and-out, and a raft of other things, like it can 'mass
change' parameters such as MIDI channel for a track, auto-limiting
of velocity, volume and controller info, and it can quantize incoming
data or auto-correct it later.
The ST version is rather sophisticated, more so I understand than
the Commodore and Apple II-e versions. I haven't seen those however,
so I don't really know this for sure.
It integrates with other Dr. T software. I seriously doubt it
integrates with anything else but what else is new...
/pjh
|
1347.2 | KCS is raw power at half cost. | IOENG::JWILLIAMS | Zeitgeist Zoology | Tue May 03 1988 12:36 | 14 |
| Something else that should be mentioned about KCS is that while
it doesn't have graphical editing, it costs about half as much,
$200 as opposed to $400. It lets you do just about everything, although
fiddling with numbers can be somewhat cryptical. I've been using
it for a while now, and I'm pretty pleased. I'm waiting for a sequencer
package that far and away takes the performance prize before I splurge.
The other ones mentioned have nice graphics, but tend to have less
flexibility. The ease of use with KCS is not the best, so what I'm
waiting for is a sequencer that has the power of KCS ( which I believe
to be the most powerful, although somewhat raw ), yet is easier
to use and switch between setups. I haven't found anything thus
far that has made me want to give up KCS.
John.
|
1347.3 | Master Tracks Pro | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - DTN 433-2408 | Tue May 03 1988 14:17 | 49 |
| I've been going thru this same hassle for about the last year or so.
Although I have never seen any of these units work, I have talked to
lots of people and have heard lots of comments from users of all the
packages mentioned so far. The general concensus among dealers is that
the Hybrid Arts stuff is the most popular software. But the one
sequencer that everyone seems to forget about is Passport's Master
Tracks Pro - and I think it's a very good piece of code. More on that
later.
You should define what it is that you need. Here are the issues that I
narrowed the decision down to:
o Is tape sync (SMPTE or FSK) required?
o Will tape sync be required in the future?
o Do you really need to drive 64 MIDI channels?
o How many SGUs (sound generation units - aka synths) do you have?
o How many SGUs do you intend to have in the next 2 years?
o How much are you willing to spend?
o Do you prefer graphic editing and mouse movement as opposed to
(computer) keyboard control?
o What are the chances of you changing MIDI computers (ie upgrading
to a MAC) in the next 2 years?
o Will this system be a studio system, a live system, or both?
o Are there features that are absolutely required (SYSEX dumps,
etc.)?
What do I recommend?
Well, after going thru this list, I decided on Master Tracks Pro. It
provides 64 tracks x 16 MIDI channels, SYSEX capability, supports MIDI
song position pointer and MIDI files format. It possibly has the best
visual interface of any unit on the market, which was a biggie for me.
The only thing that it does not currently support is real-time
recording of SYSEX data. I'm not referring to patch dumps, but rather
real-time "patch tweaking". For example, changing envelope parameters
in the middle of a patch. I do not find this limiting.
BTW - I have 6 SGUs (soon to be 9) and still do not require more than
16 MIDI channels, so the ability to drive mega-modules is not an issue
with me (yet!).
It also runs on various machines and supports MIDI files, so I am not
limited to the ST if I ever decide to upgrade my computer.
For what it's worth ...
-b
|
1347.4 | | MARVIN::SCOTT | BArry A. Scott | Tue May 03 1988 14:18 | 12 |
| The ST has just one MIDI out but you can get extra
hardware from Hybrid arts and C-Lab that expands the ST
to 4 MIDI outs and 2 MIDI ins.
The price of all these sequences is around �200~ in the
U.K. There are more expensive version of these packages
but they give you things like SMPTE timing or Tape Sych
timing.
I'll take a look at KCS, thanks for the tip.
BArry
|
1347.5 | Addendum to .3 | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - DTN 433-2408 | Tue May 03 1988 14:21 | 4 |
| Morgan at East Coast Sound will (and I quote) "beat any software price
in the country". The phone number is 203-748-2799.
-b
|
1347.6 | creator reviewed | GIBSON::DICKENS | Sproiinnnngggg | Tue May 10 1988 16:25 | 6 |
| C-labs Creator was reviewed in a recent issue of Music Technology.
They gave it high marks in general, but especially in the performance
department.
|
1347.7 | DR T's! | HYEND::RBAUST | | Sun Jun 05 1988 18:06 | 39 |
| If you haven't decided yet....
I use Dr. T's KCS, and have compared it to lots of other
software out there. Some things to consider;
OK, at first working with endless lists of numbers is incomprehensable,
but once you get the hang of it, KCS affords you limitless
editing capabilities!. If you compose serious music, you'll find
the editing power of KCS to be seemingly limitless. And again,
once you know your way around the program, it's not difficult at
all, and it's extremely fast!
Further, Dr T's KCS 1.6 (or Level II), has an MPE shell, which allows
you to run KCS and, say, one of the patch editors simultaneously!
This feature really helps if you get halfway through a composition
and find out that you need to save everything, then quit the program,
just to call up that killer synth patch for your CZ-101. Also,
Dr T's Copyist will convert KCS files (or Steinberg files if you
get v1.51) to score form. This means that you can print your music,
as well as individual parts, and have it performed by musicians!
Finally, Dr T's offers great support for it's users, they're always
releasing updates that you can upgrade to for a small fee, and Dr
T's KCS is very widely used. You'll be more likely to meet other
KCS users, to swap tips and sequences with, than you would with
one of the lesser known patches.
Hope I've been of some help....
Best o' luck deciding!
|
1347.8 | Atari St sequence packages? | CUPMK::DUBE | Dan Dube 264-0506 | Tue Oct 22 1991 14:44 | 11 |
| It's been a few years since this note was updated. I am now going
through this same struggle. Any recommendations from Atari ST users
out there?
I read the review in Electronic Musician that compared a number of
popular Atari packages. Now, I'm looking for advice on some of you
out there who have actually used the stuff.
Thanks in advance,
-Dan
|
1347.9 | Well, I'll "dive" in... | SKIVT::HEARN | Time will tell... | Tue Oct 22 1991 15:56 | 11 |
|
Dan,
I use (partially - I haven't yet been able to fully
exploit it's capabilities :^) Dr. T's KCS v3.0 for the
kind of midi/audio recording I do - I find it more than able
to satisfy my needs. May not be too helpfull, but I think
it'll really depend on what your wants/needs/requirements are...
Rich
|
1347.10 | edit track II | CSC32::M_MOSHER | Space alien escapes | Tue Oct 22 1991 18:05 | 29 |
| re -2
I use a VFX-SD for about 99% of my sequencing. I sometimes
have a need for graphic editing and use EDIT TRACK II on the Atari ST.
I bought it because it was cheap. I got it for about $60.00 from
E. Aurther Brown.
It has 60 tracks. These 60 tracks can be arranged
into patterns etc... You can record on all midi data onto one track
and split it to other tracks later. With another piece of hardware
you can output 32 midi channels.
With a little more cash you can get SMPTE TRACK whic is the
same thing but allows you to sync to SMPTE using an external piece of hardware.
It has a lot of editing features. Graphic editing is handy.
They just came out with an upgrade to these sequencers called
EDIT TRACK GOLD. It has better graphic editing etc.
There is a second package called EZ-SCORE + which will allow
you to score music sequenced with EDIT TRACK.
I am not sure how this compares to other sequences as I have not seen any
others. This one works and is cheap.
These program are produced by Hybrid Arts. I will post their address
in here tomorrow.
Mark
|
1347.11 | Notator and Cubase | NUTELA::CHAD | Chad in Munich at RTO, DTN 865 3976 | Wed Oct 23 1991 04:49 | 10 |
|
For high end I liked Notator (and Creator) quite a lot.
On the Mac I have played with Cubase. The Atari Cubase is
a more advanced version. I like this program a lot.
It is also a high end one..
Chad
|
1347.12 | Alchimie, the Price/Performance Leader | RGB::ROST | I Had A Torrid Affair With Geraldo | Wed Oct 23 1991 10:06 | 24 |
| There is a PD 32-track sequencer from Switzerland callled Alchimie, Jr.
I think there is a note on it in here.
Advantages: free!
Disadvantages: some users have talked about weird bugs, no hooks to
other programs (librarians, notation, etc.) and there is no support.
It does allow both event and graphics editing, and imports/exports
either type 0 or 1 MIDI files. One thing it *won't* do is let you edit
sys-ex messages.
I use it in a similar application to Mr. Mosher, I do the bulk of my
sequencing on my SQ-80's built-in sequencer, then download stuff to
Alchimie for fine edits that are impossible to do on the SQ-80. I have
never actually tried to sequence a piece start to finish using it.
Oh yeah, one other advantage: you can try it out at home for as long as
you like for no $$$ vs. having to decide to plunk down big bux after a
30 minute demo in a store.
Brian
|
1347.13 | Another plug for Dr. T's | TALK::HARRIMAN | 'Politically Correct' is an oxymoron | Thu Oct 24 1991 14:41 | 54 |
|
I've been using Dr. T's for a number of years now (didn't I write a
previous topic here once?).
I'm now running KCS 4.0 (Omega) Level II, along with Copyist, Quickscore,
Tiger, Song Editor, Fingers, Tunesmith, and a bunch of MPE utilities
that I have come across. (oh, and ESQapade and SampleMaker)...
All of these programs (except Samplemaker) run in the same environment,
i.e. if you load a sequence in KCS, you can load any or all of the other
programs and they all work on the same sequence in memory. MPE
(multi-program-environment) is basically a relocatable overlay
environment, so one may load ancillary programs in any arbitrary order
and switch from program to program.
Some of the things that this environment does include:
- 48 track sequence track mode (but this is deceptive, since you
can overlay up to 99 48-track sequences if you really wanted to
using the Song Editor)
- 99 sequence Open Mode for "mixed" sequences
- Song Editor for graphically assembling songs
- Variations Generator for summing/ORing/XORing algorithmic patterns
as variations to any aspect of your MIDI streams
- QuickScore does fairly quick transcriptions with no frills
- Copyist does full transcription/editing ("note processing"),
outputs TIFF,PostScript,etc.
- Tiger is a graphic editor not unlike a piano roll display, again,
you can change note characteristics by point 'n grunt
- Fingers is a strange little program for making cyclic overlaid
patterns of notes and controllers
- Tunesmith is an algorithmic composition program which generates
streams of sequences back to KCS
- ESQapade is a patch editor/librarian for ESQ-1, SampleMaker is
a sample editor and FM synthesis package for any sampler that
understands Sample Dump Standard
- there is also a thing called Phantom which does SMPTE striping and
gives you two MIDI ports. I haven't got that since I went the FSK
route a while ago.
There is a immense amount of functionality in this environment. It
definitely requires a mature hardware configuration (hard disk,
lots of memory, monochrome monitor). I'm running it on a Mega-4
since I completely outgrew my 1040ST.
Definitely NOT free. Not copy protected anymore, though. I'd say
that the above software investment was probably about $1k over
about 3 years.
/pjh
|
1347.14 | | CUPMK::DUBE | Dan Dube 264-0506 | Fri Oct 25 1991 15:17 | 8 |
| Thanks for all of the comments! It's been very informative.
Is there a place where one can go to see demos of these packages side
by side?
Once again, this notes file is proving to be a valuable resource!
-Dan
|
1347.15 | | LANDO::ALLISON | | Sat Oct 26 1991 01:22 | 11 |
| I second the strong reccomendation for KCS 4.0 in .13. The MPE
environment is very nice. I also use Dr T's XOR in my setup and its
real nice to be able to pop between sequencer(s) and librarian with a
few key clicks. It does take at least 2MB of memory to be able to load
more than 2 of the Dr T's programs at once. You can add memory to an
old 1040ST, but I found it to be not much mor expensive to just buy an
STE which uses $50 SIMMs for memory upgrades. (Doesn't anyone want my
old 1040ST?????)
Brian
|
1347.16 | MTP is nice, but a dead-end on Atari | DYPSS1::SCHAFER | Will Rogers never met Metzenbaum. | Mon Oct 28 1991 10:56 | 9 |
| It may be of interest to noters that Passport Designs (remember
MasterTracks Pro?) is NOT continuing development of MTP for the Atari.
Given that I'm a somewhat disgruntled owner of MTP, that doesn't make
me too happy.
In short, don't bother looking at MTP without talking directly to
Passport about support. This info is good as of 2 months ago.
+b
|