T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1338.1 | Restraint of trade and competition | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | The height of MIDIocrity | Fri Apr 29 1988 14:37 | 16 |
| > They specifically do not carry Ensoniq or Yamaha (part
> of the deal with Roland).
Pardon my language, but that's a real shit thing for Roland to do.
It certainly doesn't sit well with me (who's on the verge of buying
a $2k+ piece of Roland equipment from EUW).
In fact, I might even fault EUW for accepting such a deal. One wonders
what they "got for it".
But please, let's not give them any trouble about it. DECMS is a great
idea (even if I do say so myself) and I don't want to jeopardize it.
Only wanted to make a comment.
db
|
1338.2 | EUW-only | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | The height of MIDIocrity | Fri Apr 29 1988 14:39 | 7 |
| Note also that Daddy's carries Ensoniq, Yamaha AND Roland. So this is
an EU-only thing.
I have a friend who's a VP there. I can ask him about it
without causing any trouble.
db
|
1338.3 | DECMS Statistical Abstract | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | The height of MIDIocrity | Fri Apr 29 1988 14:46 | 17 |
| I seem to be going for the record of most consecutive notes! ;-)
Y'know Dave (Orin),
It occurred to me that it might be EXTREMELY valuable to be able to
give a reasonable accounting of the buying power of DECMS. It could
provide a lot of leverage in dealing with stores.
I haven't thought about it much, but I might suggest that you ask
folks to send you a list of everything they bought last year and
do some kind of simple statistical reduction (like even just a
total sum).
I'll bet you, between us all, we may account for more than $100,000
in business EACH YEAR!!!! That would comand attention, believe me.
db
|
1338.4 | | CLULES::SPEED | If it doesn't rack, it doesn't roll | Fri Apr 29 1988 15:00 | 25 |
| < Note 1338.2 by DREGS::BLICKSTEIN "The height of MIDIocrity" >
-< EUW-only >-
> Note also that Daddy's carries Ensoniq, Yamaha AND Roland. So this is
> an EU-only thing.
This is partially true and partially not true.
While Daddy's does carry Yamaha, they don't sell any of the Yamaha pro
gear in the Boston store because LaSalles has the Yamaha line for
Boston.
However, in Salem, NH you can see all three lines.
Kind of a pain. I bought my KX76 at Daddy's in Boston (used, not
new), but wasn't able to get the piano type sustain pedal (FC4 I
think) because that is an accessory carried in the pro line. Mike,
the manager (the sax player in my band), said he might be able to
work something out, but it sounded like it would be a hassle for
him. I think I'll just drive to Salem or mail order from someplace
else.
Derek
|
1338.5 | It's out here in Colorado Too | TYFYS::MOLLER | Vegetation: A way of life | Fri Apr 29 1988 15:07 | 8 |
| This same odd combinations of what can be bought at stores occurs
out here in Colorado also. Some lines of some products can be bought
at some stores, but not others. What a confusing Mess.
Just for statistic purposes, I've spent about $1,200 at music stores
since January.
Jens
|
1338.7 | Grain of Salt for peppered story | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | The height of MIDIocrity | Fri Apr 29 1988 18:34 | 28 |
| I'm planning on buying a Roland S-550 rack-mount sampler.
I'm going to mention DECMS but I'm planning on buying it at the Boston
store cause that's where my friend works (and Worcestor is way out
of my way), and there are people there whom I deal with regularly
who know that I can't be BS'ed about prices.
Regarding what Eddie says about why they don't carry Yamaha and
Ensoniq, frankly I don't believe that, and I have fairly good
reason not to either. At best, he's glossing over the real truth
First, it just doesn't make sense. The DX7, Mirage and ESQ-1 are
high volume, high margin, well supported, excellent products
and those companies have a reputation of being good to their
retailers.
Second, as I recall that EUW lost their Yamaha license. Don't
remember exactly why, but EUW was a different place as little as a few
years ago. Things are much different (better) now. In fact, I'm
pretty much buying everything from them now.
Anyway, Dave, I'd really rather you didn't repeat any of this to him.
I have no doubt that this guy is capable of giving DECMS some very
valuable help and it won't help things to seem to question what he has
said. You should just take things with a grain of salt. Including
what I've said (I could be wrong.)
db
|
1338.8 | Hey, Sugar... | JAWS::COTE | Is the last peeping frog embarrassed? | Mon May 02 1988 09:23 | 8 |
| It's not unusual for a company to offer a franchise owner some sort
of a "protected area" where, in return for buying the franchise,
the owner is given the exclusive rights to market the goods in a
given area without fear of competition.
Dunno if'n it holds true in this case...
Edd
|
1338.9 | | LEDS::ORSI | Ya mean yer in here voluntarily? | Mon May 02 1988 09:33 | 11 |
| I betcha the problem about certain stores carrying only certain brands
has to do with CMA's. 60 Minutes did a story on Coca-cola and Pepsi
distibutors who get the grocery store chains to carry only *their*
product by paying them BIG Money up front. Sort of Payola-Cola.
Apparently other Big Co.'s are squeezing the smaller and sometimes
the bigger competitors out by having the store sign a contract (CMA,
I forget what it means) agreeing to prominently display only *their*
product. This practice is becoming more common, but is now being
investigated by the Justice Dept.
Neal
|
1338.10 | | JAWS::COTE | Is the last peeping frog embarrassed? | Mon May 02 1988 09:49 | 3 |
| CMA:== Calendar Marketing Agreement
Edd
|
1338.11 | Me and my RD | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | The height of MIDIocrity | Mon May 02 1988 10:52 | 20 |
| re: .9
Ya beat me to it Neal. That was a very enlightening piece.
Let's hope the justice department starts going after Roland if that's
what's REALLY going on at EUW. However, as I've said, I'm not sure
that's exactly the case.
BTW, the justice department is doing more than "investigating" this.
There are some cases in which they've already handed down indictments.
And Pepsi was scared enough either by the bad publicity or the fear
that they might lose (it's a shame that we'll never know which) to
agree to a settlement which involved paying millions of dollars to
their competitors!
This is why I try to avoid buying Coke and Pepsi products. As much
as those companies battle each other, we still see all the effects
of an oligopoly. Gimme a Dr. Pepper over a "Coke-SI" anyday.
db
|
1338.12 | Yeah, Yeah, Bring in the FEDs! | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Mon May 02 1988 11:30 | 17 |
| re .10 - "Calendar" marketing agreement? I thought it was
"Cooperative" Marketing Agreement. What would the calendar have
to do with it?
I doubt very much that it's Roland who's telling EUW they can't
sell Yamaha or Ensoniq. Some time back the guys *I* know at EUW
said they didn't carry Yamaha because their stuff was too expensive
for what it does. Now, I doubt that EUW really has that much of
a concern about our wallets that they'd decline the opportunity
to carry a profitable line. I think it rather more likely that
Yamaha and Ensoniq had something to say about EUW carrying their
products. For a while EUW wasn't paying its bills on time, and
that does wonders for a creditor's willingness to do business with
you.
len.
|
1338.13 | I'm not making this up... | JAWS::COTE | Is the last peeping frog embarrassed? | Mon May 02 1988 11:36 | 5 |
| Yep, "Calendar". ... and damned if I know why.
Edd
|
1338.14 | | MTBLUE::BOTTOM_DAVID | Coming soon on a node near you | Mon May 02 1988 13:44 | 5 |
| According to the fellow at Sam Ash I talked to Roland won't let them
mail order any roland gear, persumably due to the discounts that Sam
Ash offers...
db2
|
1338.15 | 6-month whacks... | MELANG::MAEZ | Illegal fun, under the sun boys... | Wed May 04 1988 17:26 | 5 |
| It's Calender 'cause in the Coke-Pepsi instance, Coke would buy this
exclusivity for 6-month at a time whacks, Pepsi would in turn buy the
remaining 6-months.
�Rick�
|
1338.16 | comparision | CTCVAX::NICKERSON | | Thu May 05 1988 08:45 | 9 |
| It maybe that selling synths is similar to selling PC CAD software which my
wife did for a few years. First she had to qualify for as a dealer and
then she was given a "territory". She could only sell to people in her
territory. The PC CAD companies would not accept an order for a product that
was outside her territory. This was supposedly good for the dealers because
it reduced competition and kept prices high. (High is only relative in that
you can't making a living selling PC CAD software)
Dana
|