T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1199.1 | I've done it too | FLOWER::JASNIEWSKI | | Wed Feb 10 1988 13:51 | 17 |
|
Yes, I have a pair of good phones too...Mine are Senheiser's,
dont know what model, that I picked up for a buck at the fleamarket.
The original foam ear pads were long gone and the guy's son had
crammed on the "mini" replacement pads. After hogging out all the
foam and crap from the diaphram area, I fabricated "my own" earpads
from two radio shack foam mic windscreens. They only problem is
they keep falling off my head when I jump around, presumably due
to the round ends of the mic windscreens against my ears. Sound
great, though - just as good as my *heavy* 'ol Koss pro4a's...
Really, though, I'm so impressed with the Beyer Dynamic ones
our "sound man" uses, I think I'll shell out $65 at the Littleton
Radio Shack for a pair of my own! I highly recommend them.
Joe Jas
|
1199.2 | MDR-M77's | THE780::MESSENGER | An Index of Metals | Thu Feb 11 1988 13:34 | 3 |
| I use Sony MDR-M77's, and I really like the sound they produce...
bright, but a rich low end (geez, I sound like a wine commercial)
- HBM
|
1199.3 | Never trust headphones!!! | BARTLS::MOLLER | | Thu Feb 11 1988 18:36 | 7 |
| I had to buy some cheap speakers to tell what my mix really sounded
like. I used to use my PA speakers (a Cerwin-Vega 15, exp horn &
piezo's in each) for mix downs & they sounded great, just like my
Koss headphones. The cheap speakers seem to speak the truth to me
much better. I use them to compare my mix downs with the radio.
They taught me a bit of humility.
Jens
|
1199.4 | | FROST::HARRIMAN | with real glycerine vibraphone | Fri Feb 12 1988 09:33 | 13 |
|
re: .-1 Cheap speakers
I agree. I have two sets of speakers as monitors for mixdowns:
the real nice set of studio monitors (Eastern Acoustics), and a
set of boom-box speakers. Always switching between 'em too. Makes
sure you compromise on your mix.
My opinion is that to make a quality mix you should never listen
to just one set of speakers. Of course, listening to music is another
matter altogether....
|
1199.5 | Koss headphones | NRADM::KARL | It's computerized, no thing c,an go wrong nothing c an g | Wed Dec 20 1989 14:34 | 11 |
| I need to get some good headphones and listened to some KOSS TNT66
phones last night. They were nice and light but sounded good. They
were selling for $45.00 at Highlands in Lincoln Plaze, Worcester.
I compared them to some others that they had plugged in, and I liked
these a lot.
I know little about headphones - does anyone know about these?
Thanks!
Bill
|
1199.6 | Beyer Dynamic DT-990s | TALLIS::PALMER | Colonel Mode | Fri Dec 22 1989 10:44 | 6 |
| I use Beyer Dynamic DT-990 headphones. They are about $210 but worth
it. Frequency response is 5-35,000 Hz. These are the best headphones I
have ever heard, much better than the megabucks Stax, and truly improve
the quality of the mix.
Chris
|
1199.7 | AKG K-240 | AQUA::ROST | Everyone loves those dead presidents | Fri Dec 22 1989 10:50 | 9 |
|
I really like the sound of AKG K-240 phones. I've used them in real
studios where the bass was recorded direct and the only way to hear it
was via phones. I got a very solid, punchy low end and plenty of
clarity in the highs. Very comfortable earpads, as well. Much nicer
than Koss Pro 4-whatever-the-current-one-is. About $80 to $100
depending on where you shop.
|
1199.8 | M(other) or F(ather)? | NRPUR::DEATON | | Fri Dec 22 1989 11:10 | 7 |
| RE < Note 1199.7 by AQUA::ROST "Everyone loves those dead presidents" >
I'm looking in a flyer from Guitar Center and see AKG K-240F's and AKG
K-240M's. Do you know anything about what the differences might be?
Dan
|
1199.9 | 240DF | ELWOOD::CAPOZZO | China Beat | Fri Dec 22 1989 11:30 | 7 |
| The 240DF's are a calibrated version of the 240M's. They calibrate them
flat based on European Specs. I use these and find them to be great
there is no color added to these phones, great for mixdown. They run
around $115.
Mike___
|
1199.10 | OK to mix with headphones? | NRADM::KARL | It's computerized, no thing c,an go wrong nothing c an g | Fri Dec 22 1989 15:37 | 9 |
| I thought that it wasn't a good idea to mix with headphones (I've
read that in here somewhere).
I was looking for headphones just to monitor with in case it's late
and I can't turn up the volume on the speakers. It sounds like
you all use them to mix with. What are your thoughts/reasons for
mixing with headphones?
Bill
|
1199.11 | Yes, I mix with headphones | GUESS::YERAZUNIS | There's no force like brute force! | Sun Dec 24 1989 19:12 | 16 |
| I always mixed with headphones; that way I can concentrate on what's
going onto the mixdown tape and more easily ignore any outside sounds
(including things like unbalanced, massively unEQ'd monitor speakers,
performers screaming at each other like spoiled brats, other noise, etc.)
Headphones also give much better indication of the overall balance of
a mix, compared to speakers (because of the one-channel-one-ear
connection).
Lastly, because headphones are small enough to be personal-portable,
you can get used to _your_ set of headphones and thereby circumvent
changes in the monitor system or performers gear. (Note- if you're
mixing for a live performance, listen to the house mix, not the phones
output.)
-Bill
|
1199.12 | | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | ECADSR::SHERMAN 235-8176, 223-3326 | Mon Dec 25 1989 23:04 | 10 |
| FWIW, when I was into it I found that mixing via headphones lead to
mixes that sounded fine on headphones, but sounded off over speakers.
In particular, I found that there would often be too much bass. Also,
I found that my hearing was off due to fatigue with headphones. So,
although I would set things up using headphones, the final mix was
always checked over the speakers. If I wanted to be more professional,
I would probably have also hooked up a set of cheapie speakers to my
stereo's "B" output for another check.
Steve
|
1199.13 | AKGs are also good. | TALLIS::PALMER | Colonel Mode | Tue Dec 26 1989 09:34 | 7 |
| The AKG 240s are excellent headphones and probably the best in their
price range. The Beyer DT-990s are better but double the price. As
Steve pointed out, one tends to over-emphasize the bass when mixing
with headphones. However, the high frequency detail is better than
with speakers, so you might want to use both. (Not at the same time!)
Chris
|
1199.14 | | SALSA::MOELLER | | Tue Dec 26 1989 12:08 | 14 |
| <<< Note 1199.13 by TALLIS::PALMER "Colonel Mode" >>>
> ...However, the high frequency detail is better than
> with speakers, so you might want to use both. (Not at the same time!)
I've said it before... mixes made with headphones will sound good
on.... your headphones. I've found bad bass levels (usually too loud),
as well as far less reverb and hi-freq detailing than I heard in the
headphones..
So I use phones while constructing a piece, but speakers when I'm
setting the instrument volumes and EQ (if any).
karl
|
1199.15 | Thanks all for the info! | NRADM::KARL | It's computerized, no thing c,an go wrong nothing c an g | Tue Dec 26 1989 12:20 | 15 |
| RE: .14
Karl,
I thought it was you who had said that before - what a memory!
I think I may spring for a more modest set of headphones and save
my $$ for a good pair of speakers (I'm all set for giving a listen
on a lower end set of speakers!).
Thanks all for the suggestions on what are good headphones - at
least now I know what are good headphones should I come across a
good deal on a set of one of those that have been mentioned.
Bill
|
1199.16 | EM = Electronic Musician | SWAV1::STEWART | There is no dark side of the moon... | Tue Dec 26 1989 13:43 | 14 |
|
Perfect time to bring up this topic. This month's EM discusses
headphones in detail and corroborates the opinions presented
here.
A quick, but needless reminder: don't monitor for long periods of
time with your headphones at high level. Pete Townsend blames
head phones for the hearing loss he presently suffers.
Otherwise, they're like sonic microscopes for fine tuning the
details. As has been previously mentioned, speakers are needed
for imaging, EQ adjustments, etc. When you think you've got it
dialed, dub it to a stereo cassette and listen to it in the car.
|
1199.17 | CQM's don't have EQ! :-) | GUESS::YERAZUNIS | Caution: Contains subliminal suggestions | Tue Dec 26 1989 13:58 | 12 |
| No, dub it onto low-bias 3-for-a-$1 stereo cassette with the
head azimunth out of kilter and the dolby defeated, and listen to it on
a boom box. :-(
-----
Re: 'phones messing up EQ'
Who needs EQ? :-)
-Bill
|
1199.18 | | MALINK::SCHMIEDER | | Tue Dec 26 1989 19:18 | 25 |
| As I mentioned a few years back in SOME notesfile, the DT880's are a great
buy. They are now up to $180 or so, but it is worth it. I had to have one
speaker replaced on mine last year, but it was still cheaper than buying new
headphones. I have had mine about four years, and they have gotten heavy use.
Beyer's DT990's are apparantly the new top-of-the-line model. I couldn't find
anything higher than the ones I already had when mine needed repairing (I had
considered buying a new set instead).
The 880's are the most comofrtable headphone I have ever worn. Only after
more than four hours straight to I get any noticeable fatigue, and my ears
NEVER get hot or sweaty. They breathe very well, due to the fabric and the
design. They have a very natural sound (fairly flat curve), and great depth.
I owned the AKG 240's earlier, and couldn't wear them for more than an hour
without getting a severe headache/earache. They don't let the ear breathe.
The frequency response was also less flat than on the Beyers. The mixes I
make now are much more likely to sound reasonable on ANYBODY's system (no
matter how BAD) than mixes I did with the AKG's.
I always do a last-minute sound check using my Celestion speakers. But I find
it easier to work with the mix with phones until the final sanity check.
Mark
|
1199.19 | reply for Karl | TALLIS::PALMER | Colonel Mode | Wed Dec 27 1989 09:10 | 8 |
| Karl, the problem of bass over-emphasis you refer to is a result of
*cheap* headphones that have poor bass response. I'm with Mark -
headphones with flat response over the full audio range are quite
capable of good mixes. Another consideration is the quality of the
monitors you are using. Low budget Japanese monitors tend to be boomy
and not very flat.
Chris
|
1199.20 | Who has flat? | WEFXEM::COTE | Call *who* Ishmael??? | Wed Dec 27 1989 09:35 | 6 |
| Of course there's the school of thought that says if your audience is
going to listen on boomy low-budget monitors you should mix FOR them.
The Yamaha NS-10s were designed NOT to be flat...
Edd
|
1199.21 | What They Said, Mostly | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Wed Dec 27 1989 10:28 | 15 |
| Another vote for K-240s in any flavor. Despite Mark's bad experiences
with them, I've worn mine for hours with no problems, although I'll
echo the concern about doing any mixing for hours on end via
headphones. I used to use K-240s as my "onstage monitor" when I
playing along with a sequencer. Even in the hot and sweaty environment
of a live gig they were comfortable. Of course, that may just be
'cuz of my step time sequencing technodweebweenie pinhead...
I mix through my monitors, and use the phones to check the details;
the "microscope" analogy was right on. The "big picture" judgements
get based on what the speakers say, and what a few weeks of listening
to the mix in the car tells me.
len.
|
1199.22 | | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | ECADSR::SHERMAN 235-8176, 223-3326 | Wed Dec 27 1989 15:00 | 8 |
| addendum:
I also check(ed) a mix by playing it on car speakers as well as
headphones and home speakers. If it sounds good on all three, ship it.
But, make sure you listen plenty on all three. After a few listens the
weaknesses show up. Newness of the sound has to wear off.
Steve
|
1199.23 | You can, but don't | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Tue Jan 02 1990 11:29 | 25 |
| I agree with Karl Moeller.
Mixing with headphones is generally not a good idea. It involves
many more things than just EQ (stereo separation, room ambience,
ear fatigue, etc.).
In order to avoid starting another debate I'll say that it CAN
be done, it just shouldn't be done. ;-)
Having gone through the final mixing stages of my Commusic VII
submission, I've really come to appreciate the value of having
good monitors. A mix that sounded good on my cheapo monitors
sounded awful on my good stereo.
A pair of NF-10s got bumped WAY UP on my "list" of things I'd
like to buy.
db
p.s. The only time I ever "tweaked" a Commusic submission (when I
was the Commusic producer) was a submission that was mixed
via headphones. The EQ was so off that even with my EQ
sliders set to maximum cut on the bass, it still ended up
fairly boomy. There was a kickdrum that went right thru
you.
|
1199.24 | Mixdowns - what are you mixing for | CSC32::MOLLER | Nightmare on Sesame Street | Tue Jan 02 1990 12:23 | 38 |
| I'm also in agreement about limiting your use of headphones.
I have 3 set of speakers that I use during mix downs. An excellent
pair of cabinets (actually these are my P.A. cabinets - 15's,
Horns & Piezo's), an average set of bookshelf speakers (8's and
a tweeter) and a real mediocre set of $25.00 car sterio speakers
(radio-shack - the set that has it's own molded plastic open back
enclosures with 5 1/4 inch speakers). These are routed thru a
rotary switch & I swap back & forth all of the time. When It sounds
reasonable on the bookshelf speakers, I switch to the car speakers
& re-tweek. This goes on for a while until I'm reasonably happy,
then I bring in the quality speakers & tweek some more. Having this
range of things to play back thru lets me compromise for the low
end & make sure that it sounds reasonable on cheap speakers.
Most studios also have a set of cheap speakers around for the
same purpose.
This is handy because most of what I do ends up on Demo tapes for
my Duo, and belive it or not, most Demo tapes that I hand out (over
50 tapes last year) get played on cassette decks that have even worse
speakers than my cheap car sterio speakers (I'm usually there when
the booking negotiations start & I can tell you, the people who
might be booking you probably spent all of $25.00 on thier Demo
Playback System).
Also, for Demos, I mix down to mono (you never know what the tape
will be played back on). Even when I mix down for Sterio, I test
the mix in Mono, just in case....
When I used headphones for my mixes (Koss - I don't remember the
model, but I spent around $60.00 for them) mix downs sounded great
until I tried the mix in my car cassette deck & then they sounded
very poorly.
I use headphones when I recording & working with playbacks, but
I would never to a final mixdown using only headphones.
Jens
|
1199.25 | | ROYALT::TASSINARI | Bob | Thu Jan 04 1990 08:16 | 13 |
|
Interesting and informative conversation.
It's funny that there was so much mention about using the car to
listen to your mixes.
I've often wish I could duplicate my car interior in my house.
I can hear things in that environment that don't show up anywhere
else.
Apparently there is some validity to my experience.
- Bob
|
1199.26 | The main reason I lived alone for three years... | ALLVAX::SCHMIEDER | | Thu Jan 04 1990 20:51 | 11 |
| All I can say is, you guys must not have roommates.
The whereabouts of my roommates this weekend will determine whether I get
around to mixing down anything for COMMUSIC VII. I intend to use monitors.
Where I find headphones most useful is in stereo mix. It's too hard to do
with monitors unless you have an elaborate remote control setup, as otherwise
you can't stay positioned correctly while tweaking.
Mark
|
1199.27 | | KOBAL::DICKSON | You could be an ocarina salesman | Fri Jan 05 1990 10:01 | 3 |
| Except that the stereo image will be different. With headphones there
is no mixing of L+R, as there is with speakers. See article on
choosing headphones in the latest EM.
|